Ekonomik Kompleksite ve Finansal Gelişme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örnekleminde Ampirik Bir Analiz
Günümüzde sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyümenin temel kaynağı bilgi, beceriyi içeren verimli üretim yapısıdır. Bu açıdan yapısal reformlar büyük ehemmiyet arz etmektedir. Üretim yapısının değişmesi farklı parametrelerin kullanımına bağlıdır. Bunların başında ise finansal gelişme gelmektedir. Bu çalışma, ekonomik kompleksite* (bilgi, beceri içeren sofistike mamül üretimi) ve finansal gelişme ilişkisini, 1970-2013 yılları arasında Türkiye örnekleminde incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada birim kök testleri yapısal kırılmaları göz önünde bulunduran Zivot ve Andrews (1992), Lee ve Strazicich (2003), Lee ve Strazicich (2013) ile gerçekleştirilmiştir.** Eş bütünleşme analizinde Maki (2012) yaklaşımı, uzun ve kısa dönem analizlerinde Dinamik En Küçük Kareler (DOLS) yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda finansal gelişmenin ekonomik kompleksiteyi pozitif şekilde etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Hata düzeltme modelinde ise hata teriminin negatif ve istatistiki olarak anlamlı olduğu görülmüştür.
Economic Complexity and Financial Development: An Empirical Analysis For Turkey
Today, the main source for a sustainable economic growth is an efficient production structure including capability and knowledge. In this respect, structural reforms have great importance. A change in the structure of production depends on the use of different parameters. Foremost among them, financial development comes ahead. In this study, we have aimed to investigate the relationship between the economic complexity and the financial development for Turkey over the period 1970-2013. For unit test analysis, we have used Zivot and Andrews (1992), Lee and Strazicich (2003), Lee and Strazicich (2013) analyses, taking account structural breaks, and for cointegration analysis, Maki (2012) approach, in short and long term analysis Dynamic Ordinary Least Square Method (DOLS) have been used. We have found that financial develoment has positive effect on economic complexity. In the error correction model, we have observed that error correction term is negative and statistically significant.
___
- ANDREONI, A.,(2011). “Productive Capabilities Indicators for
Industrial Policy Design”, UNIDO Development Policy, Statistics
and Research Branch, Working Paper No. 17.
- ANG, J. B. ve W. J. Mckibbin. (2007). “Financial Liberalization,
Financial Sector Development and Growth: Evidence From
Malaysia”, Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), ss.
215-233.
- ARIZALA, F., E. Cavallo and A. Galindo,(2013). “Financial Development
and TFP Growth: Cross-Country and Industry-Level
Evidence, Applied Financial Economics, 23, 2013, ss. 433-448.
- ATLAS MEDIA, http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/, Son Erişim
(09.11.2016).
- BECERRA, O., E. Cavallo and C. Scartascini,(2012). “The Politics
of Financial Development: The Role of Interest Groups and
Government Capabilities”, Journal of Banking&Finance, 36,
ss.626-643.
- CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J. L. ve A. Sanso, (2006). “Testing
the Null of Cointegration with Structural Breaks”, Oxford Bulletin
of Economics and Statistics, 68(5), ss. 623-646.
- CAVALLO, Eduardo, ve Carlos Scartascini (2012). “Interest
groups and government capabilities matter for financial development”,
Vox EU.org, 12 May.
- CHANG, H., A. Andreoni, ve M. L. Kuan, (2013). “International
Industrial Policy Experiences and the Lessons for the UK”, Future
of Manufacturing Project: Evidence, Government Office for
Science, Paper 4.
- DAUDE, C., A. Nagengast, J. R. Perea, (2015). “Productive
Capabilities: An Empirical Analysis of Their Drives”, The
Journal of International Trade&Economic Development, DOI:
10.1080/09638199.2015.1073342.
- ERKAN, B. ve E. Yıldırımcı, (2015). “Economic Complexity and
Export Competitiveness: The Case of Turkey”, Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 195, ss. 524-533.
- FELIPE, J., U. Kumar, A. Abdon ve M. Bacate, (2012). “Product
Complexity and Economic Development”, Structural Change
and Economic Dynamics, 23, ss. 36-68.
- GREGORY, A. W. ve B. E. Hansen, (1996). “Residual-Based
Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts”, Journal
of Econometrics, 70 (1), s. 99-126.
- HARTMANN, D. M.R. Guevara, C. Jara-Figueroa,. M. Aristaran
ve C. A. Hidalgo, (2015). “Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions
and Income Inequality”, http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07907,
Son Erişim (02.11.2016).
- HAUSMANN, R. ve B. Klinger,(2009). “Policies for Achieving
Structural Transformation in the Caribbean”, Inter-American
Development Bank Private Sector Development Discussion
Paper,.No.2.
- HAUSMANN, R. ve C. A. Hidalgo(2010). “Country Diversification,
Product Ubiquity, and Economic Divergence”, Harvard
Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series, No.
RWP10-045.
- HAUSMANN, R. ve C. A. Hidalgo,(2011). “The Network Structure
of Economic Output”, Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4),
ss. 309-342.
- HAUSMANN, R., C. A. Hidalgo, S. Bustos, M. Coscia, , S.
Chung,; J. Jimerez, A. Simoes, ve M. A. Yıldırım.(2011). The
Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity,
Center for International Development at Harvard University and
Macro Connections MIT Media Lab.
- HAUSMANN, R., J. Hwang ve D. Rodrik,(2007). “What You
Export Matters”, Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), ss. 1–25.
- HIDALGO, C. A. ve R. Hausmann(2009). “The Building of Economic
Complexity”, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America PNAS, 106 (26), ss.
10570-10575.
- HIDALGO, C. A.,(2009). “The Dynamics of Economic Complexity
and the Product Space Over a 42 Year Period”, Harvard
Universtiy CID Working Paper, No.189.
- JOHN H. B. and Abu M. Jalal (2012). “A New Measure of Financial
Development: Theory Leads Measurement”, Journal of
Development Economics, 99, 341-357.
- KING, R. G. ve R. Levine (1993). “Finance and Growth:
Schumpeter Might Be Right”, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
108(3), ss. 717–737.
- LA PORTA, R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, ve R. W. Vishny(1997).
“Legal Determinants of External Finance”, Journal of
Finance, 52(3), ss.1131-1150.
- LAWRENCE, P.(2006). “Finance and Development: Why
Should Causation Matter?”, Journal of International Development,
18(7), ss. 997-1016.
- LEE, J. ve M. C. Strazicich (2003). “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier
Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks”, The Review Of
Economics And Statistics, 85(4), ss.1082–1089.
- LEE, J. ve M. C. Strazicich.(2013). “Minimum LM Unit Root
Test with One Structural Break”, Economics Bulletin, 33(4), ss.
2483-2492.
- LEVINE, R.,(1997). “Financial Development and Economic
Growth: Views and Agenda”, Journal of Economic Literature,
35(2), ss. 688-726.
- MAKI, D. (2012). “Tests For Cointegration Allowing For an
Unknown Number of Breaks”, Economic Modelling, 29(5), ss.
2011-2015.
- MCMILLAN M., D. Rodrik, ve I. Verduzco-Gallo (2014). “Globalization,
Structural Change, and Productivity Growth, with an
Update on Africa”, World Development, 63, ss.11-32.
- ÖZGÜR A. ve İ. Küçükaksoy (2006). “Finansal Gelişme ve
Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Ekonomisi Üzerine Ekonometrik
Bir Uygulama”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi
Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 4, 25-38.
- ÖZMEN, E.(2014). “Reel Döviz Kuru ve Türkiye Dış Ticaret
Dinamikleri”, ERC Working Papers in Economics, No.14/12.
- PONCET, S. ve F. S. Waldemar (2013). “Export Upgrading and
Growth: The Prerequisite of Domestic Embeddness”, World
Development, 51, ss. 104-118.
- PRASAD, E. S., K. Rogoff, S. Wei, ve M. A. Kose (2003). Effects
of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries: Some
Emprical Evidence, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 220.
- RODRIK, D. (2006). “What’s So Special About China’s Exports?”,
China&World Economy, 14(5), ss. 1-19.
- SHAHBAZ, M. S. Khan ve M. I. Tahir (2013). “The Dynamic
Links Between Energy Consuption, Economic Growth, Financial
Development and Trade in China: Fresh Evidence from
Multivariate Framework Analysis”, Energy Economics, 40, ss.
8-21.
- TARI, R. (2011). Ekonometri, Umuttepe Yayınları, 11. Baskı,
Kocaeli.
- WDI, http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators,
Son Erişim (09.11.2016).
- WESTERLUND, J. ve D. Edgerton (2006). “Simple Tests for
Cointegration in Dependent Panels with Structural Breaks”,
Lund University Department of Economics Working Papers,
No.13.
- ZIVOT, E. ve D. W. K. Andrews (1992) “Further Evidence on
the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis”,
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3),
ss.251-270.