GEORG SIMMEL: TOPLUMSAL PARADİGMAYA KATKILARI AÇISINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Nesnellik ve sosyal psikolojideki araştırma bulgularının eleştirel sistematik ölçekte anlamlandırılması keyfi değildir. Literatürdeki spesifik araştırma yöntemini geliştirme ve araştırmacının kendi bireysel tanımlamaları özellikle referanslarla sonuçlanır. Simmel için mantıksal düşünmenin rasyonelliği, kültürel alışkanlıkların bilincinde, pratik başarıdan farklı bir düzlem ve istemli eylem arasında özel bir bağlantı gerektirir. Bunu yaparken, bazı fenomenlerin tanımlanması pragmatik bir öneme sahiptir. Belli ki konumuz hakkında bir fikir üretebilmek için onu sınırlandırmak gerekiyor. Metodolojik teori tartışmaları gerçekliğin bir inşa olduğuna araştırmacıları ikna eden ve arzulanan bir sonuç olacaktır. Bu açıdan literal seçim stratejisinde, içsel olan varsayımları ortaya koymadan modellemek; teorinin egemenliğinden kaynaklanan bazı argümanların ihmal edilmesi riskini içerir. Tabii ki bir konunun zengin ve niteliksel bir şekilde araştırılması için fazla sayıda kanıt olsa da benimsenen sunum formatının gücü pek çok soruya açıktır. Araştırmanın sonunda sosyokültürel rollerin, bakış açılarını nasıl etkileyebileceği ve derin düşünme anlarına doğru ilerlemesi şaşırtıcı olmayacaktır. Bu makalede, Simmel sosyolojisinde toplumsal paradigma; kavramların uzamsallığı ve gerçeklik düzleminde tartışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Georg Simmel, Gerçeklik, Paradigma, Toplumsal, Uzam

Georg Simmel: An Assessment in Terms of Contributions to the Social Paradigm

Objectivity on a critical systematic scale and the interpretation of research findings in social psychology are not arbitrary. The researcher's own individual descriptions and the development of specific research method especially in the literature result in references. For Simmel, the rationality of logical thinking requires a special connection in the consciousness of cultural habits between a plane different from practical achievement and voluntary action. The definition of certain phenomena is of pragmatic importance in doing this. Obviously, in order to generate an idea of our topic, it is necessary to limit it. One desired outcome that convinces researchers that reality is a construct is methodological theory discussions. Modeling without introducing assumptions inherent in this respect risks neglecting some of the arguments arising from the dominance of theory in the literal selection strategy. Of course, although there is a lot of evidence for a rich and qualitative study of a topic, the strength of the presentation format adopted is open to many questions. It would not be surprising at the end of the research how sociocultural roles can influence perspectives and move towards moments of reflection. In this article, the social paradigm in Simmel's sociology will be discussed on the plane of extensional of notions and reality.

Keywords:

Georg Simmel, Reality, Paradigm, Social, Space,

PDF

___

Adair-Toteff, C. (2005). Georg Simmel – Sociology of Society. In Sociological Beginnings: The First Conference of the German Society for Sociology (pp. 45-56). Liverpool University Press.
Bond, N. (2016). Ferdinand Tönnies and Georg Simmel. In C. Adair-Toteff (Ed.), The Anthem Companion to Ferdinand Tönnies (pp. 33-58). Anthem Press.
Cantó-Milà, N. (2020). Georg Simmel 2020 – Beyond the First Centenary of His Death. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7-8), 411-420.
Coleman, M. (2002). Taking Simmel seriously in evolutionary epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33(1), 59-78.
Frisby, D. (2016). Simmel and the Study of Modernity. In T. Kemple & O. Pyyhtinen (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel (pp. 13-28). Anthem Press.
Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative Methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 15-36.
Goetschel, W. (2021). Review: Georg Simmel, Essays on Art and Aesthetics. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(7-8), 355-358.
Goodstein, E. (2016). Sociology as a Sideline: Does It Matter That Georg Simmel (Thought He) Was a Philosopher? In T. Kemple & O. Pyyhtinen (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel (pp. 29-58). Anthem Press.
Greene, M. (1986). Qualitative Research and the Uses of Literature. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 69-83.
Gross, M. (2001). Unexpected Interactions Georg Simmel and the Observation of Nature. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1(3), 395-414.
Halewood, M. (2014). Toward a Philosophy of the Social – Part One: Durkheim, Marx, Weber (and Simmel) Revisited. In Rethinking the Social through Durkheim, Marx, Weber and Whitehead (pp. 123-138). Anthem Press.
Hooker, C. (2013). Georg Simmel and naturalist interactivist epistemology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44(3), 311-317.
Humphrey, C. (2014). Qualitative research – mixed emotions. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(1), 51-70.
Kemple, T. (2016). Simmel and the Sources of Neoliberalism. In T. Kemple & O. Pyyhtinen (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel (pp. 141-160). Anthem Press.
Kuper, A., Reeves, S., & Levinson, W. (2008). Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Reading and Appraising Qualitative Research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7666), 404-407.
La Fuente, E. (2016). Frames, Handles and Landscapes: Georg Simmel and the Aesthetic Ecology of Things. In T. Kemple & O. Pyyhtinen (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel (pp. 161-184). Anthem Press.
Lash, S. (2005). Lebenssoziologie: Georg Simmel in the Information Age. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 1-23.
Mele, V. (2020). Georg Simmel and the Metropolitization of Social Life. In P. Kivisto (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory (pp. 161-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Midgley, D. (2013). After materialism – reflections of Idealism in Lebensphilosophie: Dilthey, Bergson and Simmel. In N. Boyle & L. Disley (Authors) & J. Walker (Ed.), The Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought (pp. 161-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moebius, S. (2021). Georg Simmel's political thought: Socialism and Nietzschean aristocratism. Journal of Classical Sociology, 00(0), 1-43.
Papilloud, C. (2004). Three conditions of human relations Marcel Mauss and Georg Simmel. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 30(4), 431-444.
Pescosolido, B., & Smith, E. (2021). From Georg Simmel, "On the Significance of Numbers for Social Life: Introduction," "The Isolated Individual and the Dyad," "The Triad," and "The Web of Group Affiliations". In M. Small & B. Perry (Eds.), Personal Networks: Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, pp. 29-43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Podoksik, E. (2021). Georg Simmel and German Culture: Unity, Variety and Modern Discontents. In Georg Simmel and German Culture: Unity, Variety and Modern Discontents (Ideas in Context, p. Iii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pyyhtinen, O. (2009). Being-with Georg Simmel's Sociology of Association. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 108-128.
Pyyhtinen, O. (2016). The Real as Relation: Simmel as a Pioneer of Relational Sociology. In T. Kemple & O. Pyyhtinen (Eds.), The Anthem Companion to Georg Simmel (pp. 101-120). Anthem Press.
Rammstedt, O., & Milà, N. C. (2001). Simmel, Georg (1858–1918). In Neil J. Smelser, & Paul B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14091-14097). Pergamon.
Staiti, A. (2014). Life-philosophical accounts of history and psyche: Simmel and Dilthey. In Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology: Nature, Spirit, and Life (pp. 52-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, D., Stewart, S. A., & Diefendorf, J. (2015). Simmel's time-space theory: Implications for experience of modernization and place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 45-57.
Swedberg, R., & Reich, W. (2010). Georg Simmel's Aphorisms. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 24-51.
Toews, D. (2018). Tarde and Simmel on Sociability and Unsociability. In R. Leroux (Ed.), The Anthem Companion to Gabriel Tarde (pp. 147-164). Anthem Press.
Vandenberghe, F. (2010). Immanent transcendence in Georg Simmel's sociology of religion. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10(1), 5-32.