Tuğrul ERTUĞRUL², Burcu ONUK, Murat KABAK, Sedef SELVİLER³, Sibel GÖKKURT³, Eda ŞENER³

Gerze horozu ve Gerze tavuğunda dilin morfolojik yapısı üzerine bir çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Gerze horoz ve Gerze tavuğu dilinin morfolojik yapısının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 7 adet Gerze horozu ve 7 adet Gerze tavuğu kullanıldı. Hayvanlara ait diller diseke edildikten sonra morfometrik ölçümleri alındı. Sonrasında rutin histolojik doku takibi prosedürlerinden geçilerek parafinde bloklandı. Parafin bloklardan alınan 5 µ'luk kesitler Crossman'ın üçlü boyama tekniği ile boyandı.. Bulgular: Dilin total uzunluğu Gerze horozunda 26.15±0.64 mm, Gerze tavuğunda ise 25.83±0.19 mm idi. Gerze horozunda apex, corpus ve radix linguae'nın genişlik ve kalınlık ölçüleri sı- rasıyla 3.40±0.12mm, 1.89±0,13 mm; 6.69±0.23 mm, 4,19±0.2 mm; 10.76±0.22 mm, 6.07±0.16 mm idi. Gerze tavuğunda ise apex, corpus ve radix linguae'nın genişlik ve kalınlık ölçüleri sı- rasıyla 3.39±0.19 mm, 1.82±0.07 mm; 6.26±0.19 mm, 4.18±0.31 mm ve 10.88±0.12 mm, 6.00±0.11 mm olarak ölçüldü. Radix linguae'da bulunan papilla linguales caudales dizisi sağ tarafta yaklaşık olarak 16-17 adet, sol tarafta ise 18-19 adet olduğu belirlendi. Papilla linguales caudales'in hemen ardında yer alan sağ tarafta 2 adet, sol tarafta 3-4 adet bulunan ikinci bir papilla dizisi daha gözlendi. Öneri: Çalışmada Gerze horoz ve tavuğunun morfolojik özellikleri belirlendi. Diğer kanatlı türleri ile arasındaki yapısal farklı- lıklar ve benzerlikler tespit edilerek karşılaştırıldı. Genel olarak özellikleri evcil kanatlılara benzerdi. Elde edilen bulguların anatomi literatürüne katkı sağlayacağı düşünüldü.

A study on the morphological structure of the tongue in Gerze rooster and Gerze chicken

Aim: The purpose of this study is to determinate morphological structure of tongue on the Gerze rooster and Gerze chicken. Materials and Methods: In this study seven Gerze roosters and seven Gerze chickens were used. Tongues of the animals were dissected and then measured morphometrically.Afterward, parts of the materials were subjected to routine histologic procedures and were embedded in paraffin blocks. The sections (5µ) were obtained from paraffin blocks, and preparated with Crossman’s triple staining technique.Results: The total length of the tongue was 26.15±0.64 mm in the Gerze rooster and 25.83±0.19 mm in the Gerze chicken. In Gerze rooster, the widht and thickness of the apex, corpus and radix linguae were in 3.40±0.12 mm, 1.89±0,13 mm; 6.69±0.23 mm, 4,19±0.2 mm; 10.76±0.22 mm, 6.07±0.16 mm respectively. In Gerze chicken the widht and thickness of the apex, corpus and radix linguae were 3.39±0.19 mm, 1.82±0.07 mm; 6.26±0.19 mm, 4.18±0.31 mm ve 10.88±0.12 mm, 6.00±0.11 mm respectively. The row of the papillae linguales caudales on the radix linguae was determinated approximately 16-17 in the right side and 18-19 in the left side. There is an additional row formed by 2 papillae on the right side and 3-4 papillae on the left side. These papillae were on the prominent immediately behind the papillae linguales caudales.Conclusion: The morphological characteristics of Gerze rooster and chicken were determined in the study. The differences and similarities between the poultry species were determined and compared. The properties were similar to domestic poultry in general. The findings were thought to contribute to the anatomical literature

PDF

___

Abumandour MM, El-Bakary NE, 2016. Morphological features of the tongue and laryngeal entrance in two predatory birds with similar feeding preferences: common kestrel (falco tinnunculus) and hume’s tawny owl (strix butleri). Anat Sci Int, 1-12.
Al-Ahmady Al-Zahaby S, 2016. Light and scanning electron microscopic features of the tongue in cattle egret. Microsc Res Tech, 79(7), 595-603.
Almansour MI, Jarrar BM, 2007. Morphological, histological and histochemical study of the lingual salivary glands of the little egret, egretta garzetta. Saudi J Biol Scis, 14 (1); 75-81.
Al-Nefeiy FA, 2015. Functional morphology of the tongue and lingual epithelium of the laughing dove in relation to feeding habit. Int J Res Stud Biosci, 3, 14-19.
Al-Zahaby SA, Elsheikh EH, 2014. Ultramorphological and histological studies on the tongue of the common kingfisher in relation to its feeding habit. J Basic App Zool, 67(3), 91-99.
Anonim, 2004. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2004/12/20041212.htm Erişim tarihi; 02.03.2017.
Resmi Gazete (25668 sayılı resmi gazetede yayınlanan tescil 2004/39 nolu tebliğin ek: 19).
Bacha WJ, Bacha LM, 2012. Color Atlas of Veterinary Histology. Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom, pp; 121-127.
Baumel JJ, King SA, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Berge JCV, 1993. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium, Second Edition, Nuttall Ornithological Club Publications, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp; 257-299.
Crole MR, Soley JT, 2009. Histological morphology of the tongue of the emu (dromaius novaehollandiae) II. histological features. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 76(4), 347-361.
Crole MR, Soley JT, 2010. Surface morphology of the emu (dromaius novaehollandiae) tongue. Anat Histol Embryol, 39(4), 355-365.
Crossman G, 1937. A modification of Mallory’s connective tissue stain with a discussion of the principles involved. Anat Rec, 69; 33-34.
Dehkordi RAF, Parchami A, Bahadoran S, 2010. Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the zebra finch cardueis carduelis (aves: passeriformes: fringillidae). Slov Vet Res, 47, 139-144.
Demirsoy A, 1995. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları Omurgalılar/ Amniyota, İkinci Baskı, Meteksan A.Ş., Ankara, Türkiye, pp; 222-223.
Dursun N, 2007. Evcil Kuşların Anatomisi, Dördüncü Baskı, Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, pp; 55-57,
Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJK, 2010. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, Fourth Edition, Elsevier Inc, China, pp; 794- 796.
El-Bakary NE, 2011. Surface morphology of the tongue of the hoopoe (upupa epops). J Am Sci, 7, 394-399.
Emura S, 2008. SEM studies on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores of the black kite (milvus migrans) (in Japanese). Med Biol, 152: 43-47.
Emura, S, Okumura T, Chen H, 2009. Scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the Japanese pygmi woodpecker (dendrocopos kizuki). Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn., 86(1): 31-35.
Erdogan S, Alan A, 2012. Gross anatomical and scanning electron microscopic studies of the oropharyngeal cavity in the European magpie (pica pica) and the common raven (corvus corax). Microsc Res Tech, 75(3), 379-387.
Erdoğan S, Pérez W, 2015. Anatomical and scanning electron microscopic characteristics of the oropharyngeal cavity (tongue, palate and laryngeal entrance) in the southern lapwing (charadriidae: vanellus chilensis, molina 1782). Acta Zool, 96(2), 264-272.
Erdoğan S, Sağsöz H, Akbalik ME, 2012. Anatomical and histological structure of the tongue and histochemical characteristics of the lingual salivary glands in the chukar partridge (alectoris chukar, gray 1830). Br Poult Sci, 53(3), 307-315.
Getty R, 1975. Sisson and Grossman’s the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals, Fifth Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, London, United Kingdom, pp; 1857-1866 .
Hassan SM, Moussa EA, Cartwright AL, 2009. Variations by sex in anatomical and morphological features of the tongue of Egyptian goose (alopochen aegyptiacus). Cells Tissue Organ, 191, 161-165.
Igwebuike UM, Anagor TA, 2013. The morphology of the oropharynx and tongue of the muscovy duck (cairina moschata). Vet Arh, 83(6), 685-693.
Igwebuike UM, Eze UU, 2010. Anatomy of the oropharynx and tongue of the African pied crow (corvus albus). Vet Arh, 80, 523-531.
Iwasaki S, Tomoichiro A, Akira C, 1997. Ultrastructural study of the keratinization of the dorsal epithelium of the tongue of middendorff’s bean goose, anser fabalis middendorffii (anseres anatidae). Anat Rec, 247, 149-163.
Jackowiak H, Godynicki S, 2005. Light and scanning electronmicroscopic study of the tongue in the white tailed eagle (haliaeetus albicilla, accipitridae, aves). Ann Anat, 187, 251-259.
Jackowiak H, Ludwig M, 2008. Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the structure of the ostrich (strutio camelus) tongue. Zool Sci, 25(2), 188-194.
Jackowiak H, Skieresz–Szewczyk K, Kwiecinski Z, Trzcielinska- Loych J, Godynicki S, 2010. Functional morphology of the tongue in the nutcracker (nucifraga caryocatactes). Zool Sci, 27, 589-594.
Kadhim KK, Mahdi AA, Al-Timmemi H, 2014. Histomorphological and histochemical study on the tongue of black francolin (francolinus francolinus). Int J Anim Vet Adv, 6(6), 156-161.
King AS, McLelland J, 1984. Birds, Their Structure And Function, Second Edition, Bailliere Tindall, London, United Kingdom, pp; 89-90.
Kristin A, 2001. Family upupidae (hoopoes). In: Handbook of the Birds of the World, Ed: Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Sixth Edition, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain, pp; 396-411.
Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, 1977. Anatomy of The Domestic Birds, Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, pp.45–46.
Onuk B, Kabak M, Gülbahar MY, Kabak YB, Demirci B, Karayiğit MÖ, Gültiken ME, 2015a. Gerze horoz ve tavuklarında larynx, trachea ve syrinx’in anatomik yapısının belirlenmesi. İstanbul Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 41(1), 92-98.
Onuk B, Tütüncü S, Kabak M, Alan A, 2015b. Macroanatomic, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic studies of the tongue in the seagull (larus fuscus) and common buzzard (buteo buteo). Acta Zool, 96(1), 60-66.
Özdoğan N, Gürcan S, 2006. Denizli ve Gerze yerli tavuk ırklarında yumurta verimine ait bazı özellikler. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 46(2), 13-21.
Parchami A, Dehkordi RAF, 2011. Lingual structure of the domestic pigeon (columba livia domestica): a light and scanning electron microscopic studies. Middle East J Sci Res, 7(1), 81-86.
Parchami A, Dehkordi RAF, Bahadoran S, 2010b. Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the common quail (coturnix coturnix). World Appl Sci J, 10, 1185-1189.
Parchami A, Dehkordi RAF, Bahadoran S, 2010a. Scanning electron microscopy of the tongue in the golden eagle aquila chrysaetos (aves: falconiformes: accipitridae). World J Zool, 5(4), 257-263.
Rossi JR, Baraldi-Artoni SM, Oliveira D, Cruz da C, Franzo VS, Sagula A, 2005. Morphology of beak and tongue of partrigde rhynchotus rufescens. Cienc Rural, 35 (5), 1098-1102.
Sabry DA, 2015. Comparative studies on tongue of egretta ibis and gallus gallus. Res Opin Anim Vet Sci, 5(9).
Santos C, Fukuda KY, Guimarães JP, Oliveira MF, Miglino MA, Watanabe LS, 2011. Light and scanning electron microcopy study of the tongue in rhea americana. Zoolog Sci,
Şekeroğlu A, Özen N, 1997. Gerze (Hacıkadı) ve Denizli tavuk ırklarının bazı verim özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Akdeniz Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 10, 41-57.
Taşbaş M, Özcan Z, Hazıroğlu RM, 1986. Penguenin dili ve ön solunum yollarının (larynx cranialis, trachea, syrinx) anatomik ve histolojik yapısı üzerinde bir çalışma. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 33 (2), 240-261.
Tütüncü Ş, Onuk B, Kabak M, 2012. Leylek (ciconiaciconia) dili üzerine morfolojik bir çalışma. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 18(4), 623-626.