Validation of the social achievement goal orientation scale in iranian students

Validation of the social achievement goal orientation scale in iranian students

Background: A growing number of researchers have recognized the importance of studying social goals along with academic goals to better understand motivational dynamics. While the call for a Social Achievement Goal Orientation theory has received considerable discussion in Western studies, it is not clear whether the theory can also be applied to other ethnic and cultural contexts. Aims: The objective of this study was to validate the Iranian version of the Social Achievement Goal Orientation Scale and to initially test the Social Achievement Goal Orientation theory in the context of Iranian students. Method: A total of 403 Iranian students (159 female and 244 male) from various high schools in Saveh participated in the study. Participants completed a Social Achievement Goal Orientation Scale (SAGOS) and an Achievement Goal Questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis, item-total correlation, and reliability analyses were undertaken to assess the psychometric properties of the SAGOS. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to provide further validation for the questionnaire. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the hypothesized model of social achievement goals. The fit of the proposed three-factor model was promising. Moderate support for the three-factor structure of social goal orientation was found using scores from an abbreviated 13-item SAGOS. Convergent validity for the new measure of social achievement goals was established. Conclusion: Our findings generally supported the trichotomous framework of the social achievement goal orientation theory with Iranian students. Consistent with the academic goal orientation theory, our findings indicated that social mastery and performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals had positive relationships with academic goals.

___

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student’s learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
  • Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. (1999).Social predictors of changes in students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21– 37.
  • Covington, M. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.
  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
  • Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals:A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 35–42.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
  • Elliot, A. J. (2005).A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct.In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005).Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.).Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford.
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001).A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001).Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156.
  • Elliot, A. J. (1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997).A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
  • Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Carter, S., & Elliot, A. (2000).Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330.
  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87-97.
  • Hopkins, N., & Ryan, A.M. (2000).Expanding achievement goal theory into the social domain. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1981).Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Research Report 81-8, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328– 346.
  • Patrick, H., Anderman, L., & Ryan, A. M. (2002).Social motivation and the classroom social environment. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002).Chapter five: The role of goals and goal orientation. Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Nelson, L. J., Cheah, C. S., & Lagace-Seguin, L. J. (1999). Peer relationships in childhood. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (451-502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ryan, A. M., & Hopkins, N. B. (2003).Achievement goals in the social domain. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, unpublished manuscript.
  • Ryan, A, M., and Shim, S, S. (2006). Social Achievement Goals: The Nature and Consequences of Different Orientations Toward Social Competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
  • Urdan, T. C. (1997).Examining the relations among early adolescent students’ goals and friends’ orientation toward effort and achievement in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 165–191.
  • Wentzel, K. R. (2000). What is it that I’m trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 105–115.
  • Yu, C., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.