The social problem-solving questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among turkish primary school students

Problem Durumu: Çocuklar da yetişkinler gibi günlük hayatta akranları, kendilerinden büyük çocuklar, ebeveynleri, öğretmenleri ve diğer yetişkinlerle pek çok problemle karşı karşıya kalmaktadırlar. Çocukların bu problemlerle karşılaşmalarından çok, problemi çözerken kullandıkları yöntemler önemlidir. Sosyal problem çözmede başarısız olan ilköğretim çocukların etkili sosyal problem çözme becerilerini kazanmamaları ergenlik ve yetişkinlik dönemlerinde öğrenme güçlüğü, okulu terk etme, akademik başarısızlık, zorbalık, zorbalığa maruz kalma gibi daha büyük problemlere neden olmaktadır. İlköğretim birinci kademedeki çocukların davranış problemleri, sosyal-duygusal uyumları, saldırganlık, şiddet ve öfke gibi sosyal problem çözmenin alt özellikleri ya öğretmenlerin gözlemleri ile ya da anne-babalarının gözlemleri ile değerlendirilmektedir. Sosyal Problem Çözme Ölçeği (SPÇÖ) ise çocukların kendi ifadeleri ile kişilerarası ilişkilerinde nasıl bir yöntem izlediklerini ölçmektedir. Türkiye'de ilköğretim birinci ve ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kendi ifadeleri ile sosyal problem çözme becerilerini ölçen bir ölçek bulunmamaktadır. Bu nedenle, araştırmalarda ve uygulamalarda kullanılmak üzere SPÇÖ'nün Türkçeye uyarlanması önemlidir. Diğer bir deyişle, ilköğretim dönemi çocukların sosyal problem çözme becerilerindeki mevcut durumu saptamayı sağlayacak geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme araçlarına ihtiyaç vardır. Araştırmanın Amacı: Bu araştırmanın amacı, SPÇÖ'yü ilköğretim birinci kademe Türk öğrencileri için kullanılabilirliğine ilişkin geçerlik ve güvenirlik kanıtları elde etmektir. Araştırmanın Yöntemi: Araştırma mevcut durumu sorgulayan tarama modellerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırma, Eskişehir ve Konya’da Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı resmi ve özel ilköğretimin 1 ve 2. sınıfına devam eden 376 öğrenci üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada Webster- Stratton (1990) tarafından geliştirilen SPÇÖ, Sears (1961) tarafından geliştirilen ve Uluğtekin (1976) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Sears Saldırganlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. SPSS 15.0 ve LISREL 8.70 programları ile veriler betimleyici istatistikler, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, Pearson momentler çarpım korelasyon tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın Bulguları: Açımlayıcı faktör analizi yapılmadan önce elde edilen verilerin KMO ve Barlett Testi yapılmış ve örnekleme alınan bireylerin açımlayıcı faktör analizi için yeterli olduğu bulunmuştur. Varimaks döndürme yöntemi ile yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizinde toplam varyansın %47.541'ini açıklayan iki faktörlü bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde on birinci maddenin işlemediği tespit edilmiştir. SPÇÖ'de yer alan maddelerin faktör yükleri .61 ile .72 arasında değişmektedir.

Sosyal problem çözme ölçeği: Türk ilköğretim birinci kademe öğrencilerinde psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Problem Statement: Children, like adults, face numerous problems and conflicts in their everyday lives, including issues with peers, siblings, older children, parents, teachers, and other adults. The methods children use to solve such problems are more important than actually facing the problems. The lack of effective social problem-solving skills among primary school children leads to larger problems such as learning difficulties during adolescence and adulthood, increased dropout potential, academic underachievement, bullying, and exposure to bullying. Sub-features of social problem solving, such as behavior problems, social-emotional adjustment, aggression, violence and anger in the primary school are evaluated by way of observations made by teachers and/or parents. The Social Problem- Solving Questionnaire (SPSQ) measures the methods used by the children in their interpersonal relations in their own words. As there are not any scales in Turkey that measure the social problem-solving skills of students in their own words at the first- and second-grade levels of primary school, it is important to adapt the SPSQ into the Turkish language for use in research and applications. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to translate the Wally Child Social Problem –Solving Detective Game Test developed by Webster–Stratton (1990) [(into Turkish and investigate its validity and reliability among Turkish primary school students)]. Methods: Forward and back translation methods were used to translate the Wally Child Social Problem–Solving Detective Game Test from English to Turkish. The Turkish form of the Wally Child Social Problem–Solving Detective Game Test and the Sears Aggression Scale were administered to 376 Turkish primary school students (median age M=8.10) in first and second grades. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the questionnaire. The relationship between social problem solving scores and aggression was assessed by calculating the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Additionally, internal consistency was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha, while item-total correlation, split-half, and test-retest reliability coefficients were calculated by Pearson correlation. Findings and Results: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified two factors that account for 47.541 % of the variance. Factor 1, social problem solving for peers (eigenvalue=4.96), accounted for 35.473 % of the variance and included 9 items and item loadings that ranged from .59 to .73. Factor 2, social problem solving for adults (eigenvalue=2.07), accounted for 12.068 % of the variance and included 5 items and item loadings that ranged from .63 to .72. The CFA indicated that the two-factor model fit the data well: χ2 = 171.07, df= 76, χ2/df=2.25, RMSEA=.05, SRMR=.004, GFI=.92, AGFI=.90, CFI=.96. Sears Aggression Scale was used to check the criterion validity of the Wally Child Social Problem–Solving Detective Game Test,. There was negative moderate level correlation between social problem- solving subscales and Sears Aggression subscales. The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficients were .86 (social problem solving for peers), .73 (social problem solving for adults), and .85 (total social problem solving). The Spearman-Brown coefficients were .83 (social problem solving for peers), .71 (social problem solving for adults), and .75 (total social problem solving). The test-retest reliability coefficients for the total scale social problem solving, for social problem solving for peers, and for social problem solving for adults were .85, .86, and .83, respectively. The findings also indicated sufficient evidence in favor of the concurrent validity and reliability of the Turkish Wally Child Social Problem–Solving Detective Game Test. Conclusions and Recommendations: The results of this study revealed that the 14-item Wally Child Social Problem–Solving Detective Game Test can be used to evaluate conduct problems and social problem-solving skills among Turkish primary school students between the ages of 7 and 8.

___

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. [Handbook for Social Science Data Analysis ] Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç-Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. [Scientific Research Methods] Ankara: Pegem A.
  • Bryman A., & Cramer D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows. London: Routledge.
  • Crick, N.R,& Dodge, K.A.( 1994). A review and reformulation of social information- processing mechanisms in chindren’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G.,& Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. [SPSS and LISREL applications of multivariate statistics for the social Sciences ] Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Dodge, K.A., Lansford, J.E., Salzer-Burks, V., Bates, J.E., Pettit, G.S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J.M.(2003). Peer rejection and social information- processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74 (2), 374-393.
  • Du Toit, S., Du Toit, M., Mels, G., & Cheng, Y. ( 2008). LISREL for windows simples syntax files. Scientific Software International. D’Zurilla, T.J., Chang, E.C., & Sanna, L.J.(2003). Self-esteem and social problem solving as predictors of aggression in college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22 (4), 424-440.
  • D’Zurilla, T.J., & Nezu, A. M.(1999). Problem- solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Gerhart, J.(2011). Social problem solving, life stress and experimential avoidance as predictors of anger and aggression. Un Published PhD Thesis, Central Michigan University, Department of Psychology. Hay, D.F., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45 (1), 84-105.
  • Hu, L.T,& Bentler, P.M.(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit ındexes in covariance structure analysis: conventaional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
  • Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago, Illinois: Scientific Software International, Inc. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996).
  • LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Keltikanges-Järvinen, L.(2001). Aggressive behaviour and social problem-solving strategies : A review of the findings of a seven year follow-up from childhood to late adolescence. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11, 236-250.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press Korkut, F.(2002). Lise öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerileri. [High school students' problem-solving skills ] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 177-184.
  • Lochman, J.E., & Dodge, K.A.(1994). Social cognitive processes of severely violent, moderately aggressive, and nonaggressive boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Pyschology, 62, 366-374.
  • Mash, E.J., & Barkley, R.A.( 2007 ). Assesment of childhood disorders. New York: Guilford. McMurran,M.,&McGuire, J.(2011). Social problem solving and offending evidence, evaluation and evolution. New York: John Willey Sons Ltd. McMurran, M., Blair, M., & Egan, V. (2002). An investigation of the correlations between aggression, impulsiveness, social problem-solving, and alcohol use. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 439–445.
  • Miller-Johnson, S., Coice, J.D., Maumary-Gremaud, A., & Bierman, K. (2002). Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30 (3), 217-230.
  • Mize, J, & Cox, R.A.(1990). Social knowledge and social competence: Number and quality of strategies as predictors of peer behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151, 117-127.
  • Morera, O.F., Maydeu-Olivares, A., Nygren, T, E., White, R.J., Fernandez, N.P, & Skewes, M.C.(2006). Social problem solving predicts decision making styles among US Hispanics. Personality and and Individual Differences, 41, 307-317.
  • Prinstein, M.J, & La Greca, A.M.(2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent grils’ externalizing and health risk behaviors: 6 year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72 (1), 103-112.
  • Şahin, H. (2006). Öfke denetimi eğitiminin çocuklarda gözlenen saldırgan davranışlar üzerindeki etkisi. [Anger control training effect on observed aggressive behavior in children ] . Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3 (26), 47-61.
  • Tezbaşaran, A.A.(1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. [Likert-type scale development guide] Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları. Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, D.C.: American Psyhological Association.
  • Uluğtekin, S. (1976). Ana-baba Davranışlarıyla Çocuğun Saldırganlık ve Bağımlılık Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. [The investigation of relationships between parents behavior and child’s aggressiveness, tendency to addiction] Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Webster-Stratton, C. (1999). How to promote children’s social and emotional competence. London: Sage. Webster- Stratton, C., & Lindsay, D.W.(1999). Social competence and conduct problems in young children: Issues in assesment. Journal of Clinical Child Psyhology, 28 (1), 25-43.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Social skills and problem solving training for children with early-onset conduct problems: Who benefits? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42 (7),943–952.
  • Webster, Stratton, C., Reid, M.J,& Stoolmiller, M.(2008). Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: Evaluation of the Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs in high-risk school. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49 (5), 471-488.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Lindsay, D. W. (1999). Social competence and early-onset conduct problems: Issues in assessment. Journal of Child Clinical Psychology, 28, 25–93
  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1997). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: A comparison of child and parent training interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 93–109.
  • Webster-Stratton., C, & Reid, M. J.( 2003). Treating conduct problems and strengthening social and emotional competence in young children: The Dina Dinosaur Treatment Program. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11,130–143.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. (2001) Commentary: Nipping conduct problems in the bud. British Medical Journal, 323(28), 7-19.