ULUSLARARASI EKONOMİ POLİTİKTE NEOKLASİK REALİZME DUYULAN İHTİYAÇ: AVRASYA EKONOMİ TOPLULUĞU

Bu çalışma uluslararası ekonomi politik çalışmalarında neoklasik yaklaşımın öneminedeğinmektedir. Çalışmada farklı kapitalist modellerin ve özellikle Soğuk Savaş sonrasında ortayaçıkan hibrit ekonomik sistemlerin sebebini anlamak için devletlerin içyapılarının önemli olduğunavurgu yapılacaktır. Bu bakımdan çalışma, uluslararası ekonomideki bölgesel farklılıkları anlamakiçin bütün eleştirilere rağmen neoklasik realist yaklaşımın faydalı olacağını iddia etmektedir. Bunagöre uluslararası sistemin hâkim anlayışı olan liberalizm bağımsız değişken, devletlerin içyapılarıda ara değişkendir. Ortaya çıkan hibrit sistemler de bağımlı değişkendir. Çalışmanın teorikbölümünde bu değişkenler ayrıntılı olarak ele alınacaktır. Modelin geçerliliğini göstermek içinçalışmanın son bölümünde Avrasya Ekonomi Topluluğu vaka çalışması olarak ele alınacaktır.

A NEED FOR NEOCLASSICAL REALIST APPROACH IN INTERNATINOAL POLITICAL ECONOMY: THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

This study refers to the importance of the neoclassical realist approach in international political economy studies. The domestic structures of the states will be emphasized in order to understand the reasons for the varieties of capitalist models and hybrid economic systems that emerged after the Cold War. In this sense, the article argues that neoclassical realism could be useful to understand the regional differences in international political economy, despite the critics. Accordingly, the dominant view of the international system, which is liberalism, is the independent variable and the domestic variables of states are the intervening variables. The outcomes that are the hybrid systems are the dependent variable. The theoretical part of the study will examine these variables in detail. The Eurasian Economic Union will be taken in the last section of the work as the case study to test the validity of the model.

PDF

___

Acharya, A. (2005). Do norms and identity matter?: Community and power in Southeast Asia's regional order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500047199
Acharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X
Barkin, J. S. (2010). Realist constructivism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bayramov, V., Breban, D., & Mukhtarov, E. (2019). Economic effects estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of regional linear regression. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52(3), 209– 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.07.001
Bello, W. (2009). States and markets, states versus markets: the developmental state debate as the distinctive East Asian contribution to international political economy. In M. Blyth (Ed.), Routledge international handbooks. Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation (pp. 180–200). London: Routledge.
Cooley, A. (2019). Ordering Eurasia: The Rise and Decline of Liberal Internationalism in the Post-Communist Space. Security Studies, 28(3), 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604988
Gilpin, R. (1983). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, R. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(2), 287–304.
Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton, Guildford: Princeton University Press.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1980). National power and the structure of foreign trade (Expanded ed.). The Politics of the international economy: Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hyde, S. D., & Saunders, E. N. (2020). Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space.International Organization, 74(2), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000365
Kiraz, S. (2018). Dış Politika Analizi Modeli Olarak Neoklasik Realizm: İkinci Dünya Savaşı Sırasındaki Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 417–440.
Kirkham, K. (2018). The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.06.002
Kirshner, J. (2009). Realist political economy: Traditional themes and contemporary challenges. In M. Blyth (Ed.), Routledge international handbooks. Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation (pp. 36–47). London: Routledge.
Kitchen, N. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 117–143.
Legro, J. W., & Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security, 24(2), 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560130
Libman, A., & Vinokurov, E. (2018). Autocracies and regional integration: The Eurasian case. Post-Communist Economies, 30(3), 334–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1442057
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2003). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Narizny, K. (2017). On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics: A Critique of the Newest Realism. International Security, 42(2), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00296
Nölke, A. (2018). Comparative Capitalism. In T. M. Shaw, L. C. Mahrenbach, R. Modi, & Y.-C. Xu (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary international political economy (pp. 135–154). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Öniş, Z., & Kutlay, M. (2020). The New Age of Hybridity and Clash of Norms: China, BRICS, and Challenges of Global Governance in a Postliberal International Order. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 97(4), 030437542092108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375420921086
Rathbun, B. (2008). A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism. Security Studies, 17(2), 294–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098917
Ripsman, N. M., Taliaferro, J. W., & Lobell, S. E. (2016). Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York, NY: Norton.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
Rowl, E., & Novak, R. (1993). Russia's 'Monroe Doctrine'. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/02/26/russiasmonroe- doctrine/d5fca486-5011-4417-bd49-6046c41a805d/
Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159–201.
Smith, N. R. (2018). Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations? The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 742–749. https://doi.org/10.1086/696882
Stronski, P., & Sokolsky, R. (2020). Multipolarity in Practice.
Stubbs, R. (2018). Order and Contestation in the Asia-Pacific Region: Liberal vs Developmental/Non-interventionist Approaches. The International Spectator, 53(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1402581
Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E., & Ripsman, N. M. (2009). Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. In S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, & J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 1–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Troitskiy, E. (2020). Dead-Letter Regimes in the Post-Soviet Space: Strategies and Communication. Global Society, 34(2), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2019.1700934
Vakulchuk, R., & Knobel, A. (2018). Impact of non-tariff barriers on trade within the Eurasian Economic Union. Post-Communist Economies, 30(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1442054
Vinokurov, E., & Libman, A. (2014). Do economic crises impede or advance regional economic integration in the post-Soviet space? Post-Communist Economies, 26(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2014.937094
Wallerstein, I. M. (1984). The politics of the world-economy. Studies in modern capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, 9(4), 3–43.
Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Xiao, R. (2015). A reform-minded status quo power?: China, the G20, and reform of the international financial system. Third World Quarterly, 36(11), 2023–2043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1078232
Yılmaz, S. (2015). Neoklasik Realizm: İlerletici mi? Yozlaştırıcı mı? Lakatosyan bir Değerlendirme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. (46), 1–18.