MERKEZİ VE DOĞU AVRUPA ÜLKELERİNDE GELİR DAĞILIMI YAKINSAMASI: SPSM YÖNTEMİNDEN KANITLAR

Çalışma dokuz Merkezi ve Doğu Avrupa (CEE) ülkesinde 1989-2015 döneminde doğrusal olmayan panel birim kök testlerinden Sıralı Panel Seçim Yöntemini (SPSM) kullanarak gelir eşitsizliği yakınsaması mı yoksa gelir dağılımı ıraksaması mı olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada Fourier fonksiyonlu doğrusal olmayan Panel KSS (Ucar ve Omay (2009) tarafından geliştirilen) kullanarak Chortareas ve Kapetanios (2009) tarafından önerilen SPSM yöntemi uygulanmaktadır. SPSM yöntemi yapısal kırılmalar, doğrusal olmama, heterojenite ve yatay kesit bağımlılığını kontrol edebilmede oldukça yetkin bir yöntemdir. Geleneksel birim kök testleri kullanılarak yapılan analizler CEE ülkeleri için gelir eşitsizliğinin durağan olduğunu yani gelir dağılımının yakınsadığını elde etmiştir. Diğer taraftan Fourier fonksiyonlu SPSM yönteminden elde edilen test sonuçlarında da dokuz CEE ülkesi için 1989-2015 döneminde gelir eşitsizliğinin yakınsaması teyit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, yapısal kırılmalar, doğrusal olmama, heterojenite ve yatay kesit bağımlılığı için kontrol sağlanması durumunda da gelir eşitsizliğinin yakınsadığını göstermektedir. Ülkeler ortak bir gelir eşitsizliği seviyesine yakınsamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular makroekonomik politika, modelleme ve öngörü açısından CEE ülkeleri için önemli politika belirleyicilerine sahiptir.

CONVERGENCE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: EVIDENCE FROM SPSM METHOD

This study is to investigate whether income inequality in nine Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are converging or diverging using the nonlinear panel unit root tests Sequential Panel Selection Method (SPSM) over the period 1989 to 2015. We used the SPSM procedure that proposed by Chortareas and Kapetanios (2009) using Panel KSS unit root test (developed by Ucar and Omay (2009)) with a Fourier function in this paper. The SPSM is a competent method which controls for structural breaks, nonlinearity, heterogeneity and cross-section dependency. The empirical analysis of conventional unit root tests shows that income inequality is stationary or convergence for CEE countries. On the other hand, the empirical results from the SPSM also point out that the income distribution convergence holds true for nine CEE countries in the period of 1989 to 2015. The results show that income inequality converges even if control is provided for structural breaks, non-linearity, heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Countries converge to a common level of income inequality. Our findings have some significant policy implications for macroeconomic policy, modelling and forecasting for these CEE countries.

___

  • Alvaredo, F. ve Gasparini, L. (2015). Recent trends in inequality and poverty in developing countries. Anthony Atkinson ve Francois Bourguignon (Eds.). Handbook of Income Distribution içinde (s.697-805). Amsterdam, Hollanda: Elsevier.
  • Bai, J. ve Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1177.
  • Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (Fourth Edition). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  • Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 22(1), 107-182.
  • Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-251.
  • Baumol, W.J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085.
  • Becker, R., Enders, W., ve Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.
  • Benabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth. Ben S. Bernanke ve Julio J. Rotemberg (Eds.). NBER Macroeconomics Annual Vol.11 içinde (s. 11-92). MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Badi Baltagi (Eds.). Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15 içinde (s. 161-178). JAI: Amsterdam.
  • Bernard, A.B. ve Durlauf, S.N. (1996). Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics, 71(1-2), 161-173.
  • Bleaney, M. ve Nishiyama, A. (2003). Convergence in income inequality: differences between advanced and developing countries. Economics Bulletin, 4(22), 1–10.
  • Chambers, D. ve Dhongde, S. (2016). Convergence in income distributions: evidence from a panel of countries. Economic Modelling, 59, 262-270.
  • Chambers, D. ve Dhongde, S. (2017). Are countries becoming equally unequal?. Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1323-1348.
  • Chen, Y., Chang, H., ve Su, C. (2016). Does real wage converge in China?. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 11(1), 77-93.
  • Choi, I. (2002). Combination unit root tests for cross sectionally correlated panels. mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 1-26.
  • Chortareas, G. ve Kapetanios, G. (2009). Getting PPP right: identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2), 390–404.
  • Christopoulos, D.K. ve Leon-Ledesma, M.A. (2010). Revisiting the real wages-unemployment relationship. New results from non-linear models. Bulletin of Economic Research, 62(1), 79-96.
  • Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
  • Dowrick, S. ve Nguyen, D. (1989). OECD comparative economic growth 1950-85: catch-up and convergence. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 1010-1030.
  • Dreher, A. ve Gaston, N. (2008). Has globalization increased inequality?. Review of International Eonomics, 16(3), 516-536.
  • Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2012). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 574-599.
  • European Commission. (2018). The EU-wide income distribution: inequality levels and decompositions. https://doi.org/10.2767/388578
  • Evans, P. (1998). Using panel data to evaluate growth theories. International Economics Review, 39(2), 295–306.
  • Ezcurra, R. ve Pascual, P. (2005). Is there convergence in income inequality levels among the European regions?. Applied Economics Letters, 12(12), 763–767.
  • Ezcurra, R. ve Pascual, P. (2009). Convergence in income inequality in the United States: a nonparametric analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 16(13), 1365–1368.
  • Galbraith, J.K. (2011). Inequality and economic and political change: a comparative perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(1), 13-27.
  • Gallant, A.R. (1981). On the basis in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: the fourier flexible form. Journal of Econometrics, 15(2), 211-245.
  • Goerlich, F.J. ve Mas, M. (2004). Three (marginal?) questions regarding convergence. Journal of Economic Studies, 31(1), 25-38.
  • Gomes, F. (2007). Convergence in income inequality: the case of Brazilian municipalities. Economics Bulletin, 15(15), 1-9.
  • Gomes, F. ve Soave, G.P. (2019). Convergence in income inequality: revisiting the case of Brazilian municipalities. Economics Bulletin, 39(1), 166-175.
  • Grela, M., Majchrowska, A., Michalek, T., Muck, J., Stazka-Gawrysiak, A., Tchorek, G., ve Wagner, M. (2017). Is Central and Eastern Europe converging towards the EU-15?. Narodowy Bank Polski Working Paper, No. 264, 1-111.
  • Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161.
  • Harris, R.D.F. ve Tzavalis, H.E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201–226.
  • Ho, T. (2015). Income inequality may not converge after all: testing panel unit roots in the presence of cross-section cointegration. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 68-79.
  • Hurlin, C. (2010). What would Nelson and Plosser find had they used panel unit root tests?. Applied Economics, 42(12), 1515-1531.
  • Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., ve Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
  • Islam, N. (2003). What have we learnt from the convergence debate?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309-362.
  • Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., ve Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359–379.
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., ve Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159–178.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C., ve Chu, C.J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
  • Lin, P. ve Huang, H. (2011). Inequality convergence in a panel of states. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 195-206.
  • Lin, P. ve Huang, H. (2012a). Inequality convergence revisited: evidence from stationarity panel tests with breaks and cross correlation. Economic Modelling, 29(2), 316-325.
  • Lin, P. ve Huang, H. (2012b). Convergence in income inequality? Evidence from panel unit root tests with structural breaks. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 153-174.
  • Maddala, G.S. ve Kim, I.M. (1998). Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Maddala, G.S. ve Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652.
  • Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., ve Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
  • Marina, A. (2000). Economic convergence of the first and second moment in the provinces of Argentina. Estudios de Economia, 27(2), 259-277.
  • Matkowski, Z., Prochniak, M., ve Rapacki, R. (2016). Real income convergence between central eastern and western Europe: past, present, and prospects. Paper presented at the 33rd CIRET (Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys) Conference on Economic Tendency, Surveys and Economic Policy, 14-17 September, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Milanovic, B. (1998). Income, inequality and poverty during the transition from planned to market economy. World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
  • Moon, H.R. ve Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81-126.
  • Panizza, U. (2001). Convergence in income inequality. Journal of Income Distribution, 10(1-2), 5–12.
  • Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401.
  • Pesaran, M.H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. ve Sul, D. (2003). Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. The Econometrics Journal, 6(1), 217-259.
  • Quah, D. (1993). Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(4), 427-443.
  • Ravallion, M. (2003). Inequality convergence. Economics Letters, 80(3), 351–356.
  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 1019-1036.
  • Solow, R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281.
  • Solt, F. (2019). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: the standardized world income inequality database. SWIID version 8.1. Erişim Adresi: https://fsolt.org/swiid/
  • Swan, T.W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2), 334-361.
  • Tselios, V. (2009). Growth and convergence in income per capita and income inequality in the regions of the EU. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(3), 343-370.
  • Ucar, N. ve Omay, T. (2009). Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Economics Letters, 104(1), 5–8.
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3688
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1981
  • Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ÇİN’İN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNDE İVME KAYBI: İHRACAT-KAMU HARCAMALARI ETKİSİ, TODA-YAMAMOTO NEDENSELLİK TESTİ

Dilek Temiz DİNÇ

YEŞİL TÜKETİCİ DEĞERİNİN TATİL TERCİHİNE ETKİSİNDE DEĞİŞİKLİK ARAYIŞININ ARACILIK ROLÜ: ADANA İLİNDE YAPILAN BİR ARAŞTIRMA

A. Celil ÇAKICI, Oya YILDIRIM

DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME: OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN PANEL EŞİK DEĞER ANALİZİ

Özgür KOÇBULUT, Halil ALTINTAŞ

İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ

Ömer Erdem KOÇAK, Serkan EREBAK

TÜRK EKONOMİSİNDE BÜTÇE AÇIĞI VE ENFLASYON İLİŞKİSİNİN SINIR TESTİ YAKLAŞIMI İLE EŞ-BÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

Gökçe MARAŞ, Cüneyt DUMRUL

CEP TELEFONU PAZARINDA MÜŞTERİ MEMNUNİYETİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN ACSI MODELİYLE ARAŞTIRILMASI

Erkan ARI, Veysel YILMAZ, Gizem ÇELME KABAKÇI

AHİLİK TEŞKİLATI VE ANADOLU TÜRK ŞEHİRLERİNİN İKTİSADİ YAPISI: KAYSERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Ekrem ERDEM

FİNANSAL İSTİKRARI SAĞLAMADA ULUSLARARASI REZERVLER ÖNEMLİ BİR ARAÇ MIDIR?

Tayfur BAYAT, Şebnem TAŞ

ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ALGISI, YAŞAM DOYUMU VE BİR ROLE TUTULMA ETKİLEŞİMİ: SOSYAL BİLİŞSEL BİR YAKLAŞIM

Murat GÜLER, Fatih ÇETİN, Onur KÖKSAL

SÜREKLİ DENETİM YÖNTEMİ OLARAK BANKALARDA MERKEZDEN DENETİMİN HİLE İLE MÜCADELEDE ÖNEMİ: PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE NİTEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Mustafa GÜL, İsmail KABAN