ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ALGISI, YAŞAM DOYUMU VE BİR ROLE TUTULMA ETKİLEŞİMİ: SOSYAL BİLİŞSEL BİR YAKLAŞIM

Bu çalışmada, bireylerin öz-yeterlilik düşüncelerinin yaşam doyumlarını nasıl etkilediğini ve bu süreçte role tutulmanın bir aracılık rolü olup olmadığının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla alanda ulusal ve uluslararası geçerliliği olan ölçeklerle oluşturulan anket formu, kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 309 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerinin testi için yapısal eşitlik modeli kurulmuş, aracılık rolünü incelemek için önyükleme yöntemiyle dolaylı etkilerin anlamlılığına bakılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Pozitif Psikoloji, Sosyal Bilişsel Teori, Rol Teorisi ve Kendini Düzenleme Teorisi çerçevesinde, öz-yeterliliğin yaşam doyumunu hem doğrudan hem de role tutulma aracılığıyla artırdığını göstermiştir.

THE INTERACTION OF PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY, LIFE SATISFACTION AND ENGAGEMENT IN A ROLE: A SOCIAL COGNITIVE APPROACH

In this study, the main purpose is to explore how self-efficacy beliefs influence life satisfaction and whether engagement in a role has a mediating role in these relations. For this purpose, a survey, including validated instruments for the national and international samples was administered to 309 university students with a convenience survey method. We used a structural equation modeling for testing the research hypothesis and sought the significance of indirect effect in the model for determining the mediating role with using the bootstrapping method. The results showed that self-efficacy not also increases life satisfaction directly but also increases with the mediating role of engagement in a role within the scope of Positive Psychology, Social Cognitive Theory, Role Theory, and Self-Regulation Theory.

___

  • Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., ve Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58-60.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., ve Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769-782.
  • Bradley, R. H., ve Corwyn, R. F. (2004). Life satisfation among European American, African American, Chinese American, Mexican American, and Dominican American adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(5), 385-400.
  • Breso, E., Schaufeli, W. B., ve Salanova, M. (2011). Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A Quasi-experimental Study. Higher Education, 61, 339-355.
  • Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W., ve Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
  • Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., ve Hall, C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417-427.
  • Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., ve Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
  • Coffman, D. L., ve Gilligan, T. D. (2002). Social supports, stress, and self-efficacy: Effects on students’ satisfaction. College Student Retention, 4(1), 53-66.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experiences. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Dewitz, S. J., ve Walsh, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy and college student satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 10(3), 315-326.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-
  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103-157.
  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., ve Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99, 413-429.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., ve Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hu, L., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Jerusalem, M., ve Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal process. Ralf Schwarzer (Ed.). Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action içinde (s. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., ve Gonyea R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540-563.
  • Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., ve Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 249-262.
  • O’sullivan, G. (2011). The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction amog undergraduates. Social Indicators Research, 101, 155-172.
  • Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., ve Pyhalto, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40-51.
  • Pilcher, J. J. (1998). Affective and daily event predictors of life satisfaction in college students. Social Indicators Research, 43, 291-306.
  • Preacher, K. J., ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., ve Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 583-630.
  • Salmela-aro, K., ve Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands-resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 137-151.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., ve Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., and Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2), 177-196.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-roma, V., ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., ve De Witte, H. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The uwes-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000430.
  • Seligman, M. E. P., ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., ve Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.). Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education içinde (s. 475-494). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Shrout, P. E., ve Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
  • Skinner, E. A., ve Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Sandra L. Christenson; Amy L. Reschly ve Cathy Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement içinde (s. 21-44). New York: Springer.
  • Suldo, S. M., ve Huebner, E. S. (2006). Is extremely high life satisfaction during adolescence advantageous. Social Indicators Resarch, 78, 179-203.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1-46.
  • Wefald, A. J., ve Downey, R. G. (2009). Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 91-111.
  • Xiao, J. J., Tang, C., ve Shim, S. (2009). Acting for happiness: Financial behavior and life satisfaction of college students. Social Indicators Research, 92, 53-68.
  • Yeşilay, A. (1996, Kasım 2018). Genelleştirilmiş özyetki beklentisi ölçeği. Erişim adresi: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/turk.htm.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3688
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1981
  • Yayıncı: -