BORSA İSTANBUL SEKTÖR ENDEKSLERİNİN KARŞILIKLI BAĞIMLILIKLARININ TEST EDİLMESİ

Portföy çeşitlendirmesi, bireysel ve kurumsal yatırımcılar tarafından, çeşitli ekonomikkoşullar altında optimal sonuçlar elde etmek için sıklıkla kullanılır. Bir portföydeki varlıklar mevcutpiyasa koşullarına göre farklı tepkilere sahipse, yatırımcının riski en aza indirgemek için bir fırsatıolabilir. Bu çalışmada 02.01.2014-14.05.2017 dönemi için günlük ve haftalık veriler dikkate alınarakBorsa İstanbul’da yer alan mali, sınai, hizmetler ve teknoloji endeksleri arasındaki ilişkiler Johanseneşbütünleşme testi ile araştırılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda endeksler arasında herhangi bir eşbütünleşmeilişkisine rastlanılmamıştır. Ayrıca yapılan Granger nedensellik testi sonucunda endeksler arasındaherhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisi de tespit edilememiştir. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar özellikle de yerliyatırımcıların borsa içerisinde sektörel açıdan çeşitlendirme yapabileceklerini ortaya koymaktadır.

TESTING THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF BORSA ISTANBUL SECTOR INDICES

Portfolio diversification is often used by individual and institutional investors to achieve optimal results under various economic conditions. Portfolio diversification is frequently used by individual and institutional investors to achieve optimal results under various economic conditions. If assets in a portfolio have different responses to current market conditions, the investor may have an opportunity to minimize the risk. One way to minimize portfolio risk is to allocate investments to some non-interrelated sector indices based on a specific market condition on the local stock exchange. In this study, the relationship between financial, industrial, services and technology indices in Borsa Istanbul are examined by using the Johansen cointegration test considering the daily and weekly data for the period 02.01.2014-14.05.2017. As a result of the study, no cointegration relationship is found between indices. In addition, no causal relationship is found determined the indices as a result of Granger causality test. These results show that especially domestic investors can make sectorial diversification in the stock market.

___

  • Al-Fayoumi, N., Khamees, B., ve Al-Thuneibat, A. (2009). Information transmission among stock return indexes: evidence from the Jordanian stock market. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 24, 194-208.
  • Arbelaez, H., Urrutia, J., ve Abbas, N. (2001). Short-term and long-term linkages among the Colombian capital market indexes. International Review of Financial Analysis, 10, 237-273.
  • Berument, H., Akdi, Y., ve Atakan, C. (2005). An empirical analysis of Istanbul stock exchange sub-indexes. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 9(3), 1-12.
  • Chuang, I., Lu, J., ve Tswei, K. (2007). Interdependence of international equity variances: evidence from East Asian markets, Emerging Markets Review, 7, 311-327.
  • Constantinou, E., Kazandjian A., Kouretas, G., ve Tahmazian, V. (2008).
  • Cointegration, causality and domestic portfolio diversification in the Cyprus stock exchange. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 4, 26-41.
  • Corhay, A., Tourani, R. A. ve Urbain, J. (1993). Common stochastic trends in European stock markets, Economics Letters, 42(4), 385-390.
  • Cotter, J. (2004). International capital market integration in a small open economy: Ireland January 1990-December 2000. International Review of Financial Analysis, 13, 669-85.
  • Çıtak, L. ve Gözbaşı, O. (2007). İMKB ile bazı önde gelen gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülke borsaları arasındaki bütünleşmenin temel endeks veya ana sektör endeksleri temelinde analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 249-271.
  • Deo, V. (2014). Investigating cointegration between some Indian stock indices. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(1), 1869- 1873.
  • Dickey, D. A., ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 427-431.
  • Duran, S. ve Şahin, A. (2006). İMKB hizmetler, mali, sınai ve teknoloji endeksleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi, Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 57-70.
  • Elmas, B. (2013). İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası’nda hesaplanan endeksler arası ilişkiler, Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2(5), 21-34.
  • Engle, R. F., ve Yoo, B. S. (1987). Forecasting and testing in co-integrated systems, Journal of Econometrics, 35, 143-159.
  • Engle, R. F., ve Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
  • Eyüboğlu, K., ve Eyüboğlu, S. (2016). Metal fiyatları ile BIST-Madencilik endeksinde işlem gören hisse senetleri arasındaki ilişkinin test edilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 36, 130-141.
  • Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Guha, B., Avijan, D., ve Bandyopadhyay, G. (2016). Measurement of risk vs return of Indian sectoral indices, Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(2), 106-111.
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 251-254.
  • Johansen, S., ve Juselius K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Kasa, K. (1992). Common stochastic trends in international stock markets, Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 95-124.
  • Krishnankutty, R., ve Tiwari, A.K. (2011). Are the Bombay stock exchange sectoral indices of Indian stock market cointegrated? evidence using fractional cointegration test. Journal of Emerging Financial Markets, 2(1), 37-45.
  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), P77- 91.
  • Mishra, A. K. (2002). International financial integration of domestic financial markets: a study of India. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 8(2), 5- 15.
  • Mohanty, S., ve Pathak, P. (2017) Interlinkages of Asian and US stock market: a study of selected indices. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 7(10), 1-10.
  • Narayan, P. K., ve Smyth, R. (2004). Modeling the linkages between the Australian and G7 stock markets: common stochastic trends and regime shifts. Applied Financial Economics, 14, 991-1004.
  • Phillips, C.B. P., ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biomètrika, 75(2), 336-346.
  • Rajamohan, S., ve Muthukamu, M. (2014). Bank Nifty Index and other sectoral indices of NSE-A comparative study. Paripex-Indian Journal of Research, 3(4), 147-149.
  • Sachdeva, J.K., ve Nair, J. (2018). Cointegration of East Asian, Indian and European Markets-A study of impact on Indian bourses. Journal of Global Economy, 14(1), 3-27.
  • Subha, M.V., ve Nambi, T. (2010). A study on cointegration between Indian and American stock markets, Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 5(1), 105-113.
  • Surya, A. C., ve Natasha, G. (2018). Is There any sectoral cointegration in Indonesia equity market?, International Research Journal of Business Studies, 10(3), 159-172.
  • Theophano, P., ve Poshakwale, S. (2008). Long-run and short-run relationship between the main stock indexes: evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 18(17), 1401-1410.
  • Tıiwari, A. K., Dar, A. B., Niyati, B., ve Shah, A. (2013). Stock market integration in Asian countries: evidence from wavelet multiple correlations, Journal of Economic Integration, 28(3), 441-456.
  • Walid, M.A. (2012). On the interdependence structure of market sector indices: the case of Qatar Exchange. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), 468-488.
  • Wang, Z., Kutan, A., ve Yang, J. (2005). Information flows within and across sectors in Chinese stock markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45, 767-780.
  • Yağlı, İ. (2016). Uluslararası portföy çeşitlendirmesi kapsamında ABD ile BRICS ve Türkiye hisse senedi piyasaları arasındaki eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin analizi. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1-2), 13-22.
  • Yüksel, E., ve Güleryüz, G. (2010). How the sector indexes are related to ISE 100 Index: an empirical study on Istanbul Stock Exchange. 24th Mini Euro Conference Continuous Optimization and Information-Based Technologies in the Financial Sector içinde (ss.1-10).