Fatih KOÇAK, Hasan KIZILKAYA, Naziye KOÇLAR

ÖZEL YETENEKLI ÖĞRENCILERIN İLETIŞIM BECERILERININ FARKLI DEĞIŞKENLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESI

This study aims to examine the communication skills of students with special abilities in terms of different variables (gender ̧ parents' education status, number of siblings, birth order ̧ liking of group activities, and parents' occupational groups). The descriptive survey model was taken as a basis for the study. The study participants consisted of 160 gifted students studying at the Science and Art Center. The data were obtained by using the Communication Scale. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used. According to the results of the research, the scores of male students on the communication scale are significantly higher than the average score of female students. While there was a significant difference in the mean of communication scores according to the variables of the education status of the mother and father and the profession of the father, no significant difference was found according to the other variables. The results obtained indicate that in determining and developing the communication skills levels of students with special abilities, variables such as the gender of the students and the educational status of their parents should be taken into consideration.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Special ability, communication, demographic variables.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF GIFTED STUDENTS IN TERMS OF DIFFERENT VARIABLES

This study aims to examine the communication skills of students with special abilities in terms of different variables (gender, parents' education status, number of siblings, birth order, enjoying to participate in group activities, and parents' occupational groups). The descriptive survey model was taken as a basis for the study. The study participants consisted of 160 gifted students studying at the Science and Art Center. The data were obtained by using the Communication Scale. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used. According to the results of the research, the scores of male students on the communication scale are significantly higher than the average score of female students. While there was a significant difference in the mean of communication scores according to the variables of the education status of the mother and father and the profession of the father, no significant difference was found according to the other variables. The results indicate that in determining and developing the communication skills levels of students with special abilities, variables such as the gender of the students and the educational status of their parents should be taken into consideration.

Keywords:

Special ability, communication, demographic variables.,

PDF

___

Referans1 Alfarah, Y. F. (2013). Communication Skills among Gifted Students in Jordan. Gifted and Talented International, 28(1-2), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2013.11678420
Referans2 Altıntaş, G. (2006). Liseli ergenlerin kişiler arası iletişim becerileri ile akılcı olmayan inançları arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi.
Referans3 Altunok, E. B. (2019). Anne baba tutumları ile okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi.
Referans4 Barkman, S., Machtmes, K. (2002). Communication evaluation scale. CYFAR project, 2012-18.
Referans5 Berger, C.R., ve Chaffee, S.H. (1987). Handbook of communication science. Sage.
Referans6 Bingöl, G., ve Demir, A. (2011). Amasya sağlık yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin iletişim becerileri. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, 26(4), 152-159.
Referans7 Buescher, T. M. (1985). A framework for understanding the social and emotional development of gifted and talented adolescents. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 8(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198509552919
Referans8 Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5. Ed.). Merrill.
Referans9 Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(4), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328801100406
Referans10 Cüceloğlu, D. (1997). Yeniden İnsan İnsana. Remzi Kitapevi.
Referans11 DeVito, J.A. (2013). The interpersonal communication book, 13th edition. Pearson.
Referans12 Diezmann, C.M., & Watters, J.J. (1995). Off with the fairies or gifted? The problems of the exceptionally gifted child. Queensland University of Technology.
Referans13 Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327–1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
Referans14 Ege, G. B. (2004). Enformasyon iletişim çağında eğitim ve bilgisayar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 5(1).
Referans15 Erdoğan, İ. ve Alemdar, K. (2005). Öteki kuram, kitle iletişim kuram ve araştırmalarının tarihsel ve eleştirel bir değerlendirmesi, Geliştirilmiş 2. Baskı. Erk Yayınları.
Referans16 Ergin, H. (2003). İletişim becerileri eğitim programı’nın okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının iletişim beceri düzeylerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
Referans17 Erigüç, G., Şener, T., & Hüseyin, E. R. İ. Ş. (2013). İletişim becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir meslek yüksekokulu öğrencileri örneği. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 16(1), 45-65.
Referans18 Glumbić, N., & Brojčin, B. (2012). Factor structure of the Serbian version of the Children's Communication Checklist-2. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5), 1352-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.010
Referans19 Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Dimensions of perfectionism in unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(1), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.1.98
Referans20 Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence, In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds), Sociolinguistics, 269-293. Penguin.
Referans21 Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
Referans22 Johnson, K. (2001). Integrating an affective component in the curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2001-547
Referans23 Kara, N. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilere yönelik kişiler arası iletişim becerilerini destekleyici program modeli. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi.
Referans24 Karacan, E. (2000). Çocuklarda dil gelişimini etkileyen faktörler. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(7), 1-8.
Referans25 Karatekin, K., Sönmez, Ö. F., & Kuş, Z. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin iletişim becerilerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), 7(3 b), 1695 - 1708.
Referans26 Kaya, F., Kanik, P. ve Akin, S. (2016). Üstün Zekalı ve Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Duygusal Zeka ve İletişim Becerileri Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 229-244.
Referans27 Kaya, N., Turan, N., Kamberova, H. A., Cenal, Y., Kahraman, A., ve Evren, M., (2016). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin sanat özelliklerine göre iletişim becerileri ve sosyal zekâ düzeyleri. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 13(1), 50-58.
Referans28 Kayabaşı, Y., ve Akcengiz, S. A. (2014). Eğitim Fakültesinde Okuyan Öğretmen Adaylarının İletişim Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (33).
Referans29 Kitano, M. (1990). Intellectual abilities and psychological intensities in young children: Implications for the gifted. Roeper Review, 13(1), 5-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199009553296
Referans30 Koç, İ. (2015). Bilim Ve Sanat Merkezine devam eden özel yetenekli öğrencilerin ı̇letişim becerileriyle ı̇lgili görüşleri, Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 39-53.
Referans31 Lewis, S. A. (1999). Selected aspects of communicative competence among gifted adolescents. Kent State University.
Referans32 Oğurlu, Ü. ve Yaman, Y. (2010). Üstün zekâlı/yetenekli çocuklar ve iletişim. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 213-223.
Referans33 Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. (2017). Beni anlayın özel yetenekli çocuğum var, Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü: Ankara.
Referans34 Perham, H.J. (2012). Interpersonal Skills of Gifted Students: Risk versus Resilience, PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University.
Referans35 Piechowski, M. M. (1999). Overexcitabilities. M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity: Vol. 2 (pp. 325-334). Academic Press.
Referans36 Purhonen, P. (2008). SME internationalization as a challenge to interpersonal communication competence: an analysis of interpersonal communication competence in networking and collaboration. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 18.
Referans37 Reilly, S., Wake, M., Bavin, E. L., Prior, M., Williams, J., Bretherton, L., ... & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2007). Predicting language at 2 years of age: a prospective community study. Pediatrics, 120(6), e1441- e1449. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0045
Referans38 Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (53-92). Cambridge University Press.
Referans39 Roedell, W. C. (1984). Vulnerabilities of highly gifted children. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 6(3), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198409552782
Referans40 Sak, U. (2020). Üstün zekâlılar, özellikleri, tanılanmaları, eğitimleri. (5. Baskı). Vize Yayınevi.
Referans41 Saygıdeğer A. (2004). Benlik saygısı düzeyleri farklı genel lise öğrencilerinin bazı kişisel özelliklerine göre iletişim becerilerine ilişkin algılarının incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi.
Referans42 Sonntag, J. H. (1973). Communication Skills: Curriculum Guide for Teaching Gifted Students Communication Skills in Grades Four through Twelve. California State Department of education.
Referans43 Tatkovic, N., Ruzic, M., & Dujmovic, M. (2005). Communication for the Purpose of Encouraging Gifted Students. Croatian Pedagogical And Literary Association.
Referans44 Topbaş, S. S. (2006). Konuşma Dilinin Evrim Sürecinde İletişim-Dil-Konuşma Bağıntısı. Bölüm 1. Dil ve Kavram Gelişimi. Editör: S. Seyhun Topbaş.
Referans45 Yoo, J. E., & Moon, S. M. (2006). Counseling needs of gifted students: An analysis of intake forms at a university-based counseling center. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986206050001