Türk kamu kurumlarında performans değerlendirmenin etkin hale getirilmesi: Emniyet Teşkilatı örneği

Polisin sosyal hayatta ve devlet mekanizmasında sürekli artan rolü, polis teşkilatlarının performansının bilimselolarak doğru bir şekilde ölçülmesini de bir mecburiyet haline getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak, çok sayıdaAmerikan polis teşkilatları arasından seçilen teşkilatların performans değerlendirme sistemleri incelenerek TürkPolis Teşkilatı performans değerlendirme sistemi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Türk Polis Teşkilatı için örnek formhazırlanmış ve örnek formda belirtilen hususlara ilişkin toplam 1009 Emniyet Teşkilatı personelin görüşlerialınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın ve bu alanda yapılan diğer akademik ve pratik çalışmaların çıktılarından faydalanılarak2013 yılında ilk defa uygulanılan Emniyet Teşkilatı Kurum içi Bireysel Performans Değerlendirme Sistemihayata geçirilmiştir.

An effective performance appraisal system for Turkish administrative sysytem: Turkish national police example

Increasing role of police both in the social life and in state over the last decades has made the accurate andscientific measure of the police performance been compulsory. In this study, performance appraisal systems ofselected United States Law Enforcements were evaluated and compared to the Turkish National Police (TNP)performance appraisal system. Sample form was developed and delivered to 1009 TNP members to obtain theiropinions about the potential indicators of performance appraisal system. In the light of the outcomes of this studyand other academic and practical works, Turkish National Police Performance Appraisal System was put intoeffect at the beginning of 2013.

___

  • Fulton, R. (1999). "Command corner: Don't coddle poor performers". Women Police, 33 (3), 41-44.
  • Gaston, K. C., ve King, L. (1995). "Management development and training in the police: A survey of the promotion process." Journal of European Industrial Training,19(7), 20- 33.
  • Gianakis, G. A. (1994). "Patrol Officer Performance Appraisal; Problems and Prospects". American Journal of Criminal Justice. 18,199-217.
  • Golden, J. W. (2000). Productivity and performance evaluation. In Doerner,W. G., and Dantzker, M. L. (2000). Contemporary police organization and Management: issues and trends (s. 89-115). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Graves, J. P. (1984). "Let’s put appraisal back in performance appraisal". In International City Management Association (1984). Creative personnel practices: new ideas for local government (s.57-74). Washington, D.C.
  • Gul, S. K. (2001). "Police Performance Appraisal in the Turkish ?ational Police and a Survey of Ankara Police Department" Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, Mart 5, 2003
  • Kane, Jeffrey, S. Bernardin, H. Hohn ve Wiatrowski, M. (1995). "Performance Appraisal". In Brewer, N. and Wilson, C., Lawrence Erlbaum (Ed.) Psychology and Policing. , Hillsdale , New Jersey: Associates Publishers
  • Kramer, M. (1998). "Designing an individualized performance evaluation system". FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67(3), 20-29.
  • McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Moore, M. H. ve Braga, A. (2003). "Measuring and improving police performance: The lessons of COMPSTAT and its progeny". Policing, 26. (3),15.
  • Roberg, R. R. (1979). " Police Management and Organizational Behavior: A Contingency Approach". St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Wolfer, L. ve Baker, T. E. (2000). "Evaluating Small Town Policing: Methodological Issues". Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 15; 52-63.