Zones of tolerance for higher education services: A diagnostic model of service quality towards student services

Bu çalışma, yükseköğretim kurumlarında öğrencilerin hizmet beklentileri ile ilgili tolerans kuşağını tespit etmekte ve öğrenci memnuniyetini ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırmada, yükseköğretim kurumlarında öğrenci işleri, kütüphane, fakülte/yüksekokul idareleri, rektörlük, yurtlar, spor ve sağlık merkezleri gibi idari birimler tarafından sağlanan hizmetlerin kalitesi tespit edilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada HEDZOT başlıklı kavramsal bir model de önerilmiş olup, araştırma sonuçları öğrencilerin hizmet değerlendirilmesi aşamasında iki farklı çeşit beklentiyi - 'arzu edilen' ve 'en düşük kabul edilebilir' - dikkate aldıkları ve öğrencilerin yükseköğretim hizmetlerini değerlendirmede bu iki çeşit beklentiyi karşılaştırma yaparlarken standart olarak kullandıkları belirlenmiştir. Bulgulardan, öğrencilerin yükseköğretim hizmetleri ile ilgili dar tolerans kuşaklarına sahip oldukları da tespit edilmiştir.

Yükseköğretim hizmetlerinde tolerans kuşağı: Öğrenci hizmetleri ile ilgili tanımlayıcı hizmet kalitesi modeli

The present study describes the zone of tolerance for students' service expectations and determines the student satisfaction level for higher education institutes. It attempts to diagnose the service quality level of administrative units, such as services provided by the registrar, library, faculty/school offices, rector's office, dormitories, sports and health centre in a university setting. A conceptual model HEDZOT is presented in this study, and the results demonstrate that evaluation of services can be scaled according to different types of expectations—'desired' and 'adequate'—and that students use these two types of expectations as a comparison standard in evaluating higher education services. The findings reveal that students have a narrow zone of tolerance with regards to the services provided by higher education.

___

  • Aaker, D.A., Kumar, V., & Day, G.S. (1995). Marketing Research (5th Ed.). New York: John Wiley.
  • Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 71-89.
  • Allen, J., & Davis, D. (1991). Searching for excellence in marketing education: The relationship between service quality and three outcome variables. Journal of Marketing Education, Spring, 47-55.
  • Aulakh, P.S., & Kotabe, M. (1993). An assessment of theoretical and methodological developments in international marketing. Journal of International Marketing, 1(2), 5-28.
  • Avdjieva, M., & Wilson, M. (2002). Exploring the development of quality in higher education. Managing Service Quality, 12(6), 372-383.
  • Babukus, E., & Boller, G.W. (1992). An empirical assessment of SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268.
  • Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V.A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioural intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7-27.
  • Brightman, H.J., Elliot, M., & Bhada, Y. (1993). Increasing the effectiveness of student evaluation of instructor data through a factor score comparative report. Decision Science, 24, 192-199.
  • Cannon, J.P., & Sheth, J.N. (1994). Developing a curriculum to enhance teaching of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(2), 3-14.
  • Cavana, R.Y., Corbett, L.M., & Lo, (Glenda) Y.L. (2007). Developing zones of tolerance for managing passenger rail service quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(1), 7-31.
  • Cheng, Y.C. (1990). Conception of school effectiveness and models of school evaluation: A dynamic perspective. Education Journal, 18(1), 47-62.
  • Churchill, A.G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
  • Cronin, J.J., & Tayler, S.A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
  • Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 415-441.
  • Ekinci, Y., Prokopaki, P., & Cobanoglu, C. (2003). Service quality in Cretan accommodations: Marketing strategies for the UK holiday market. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(1), 47-66.
  • Elliott, K.M., & Shin D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 199-209.
  • Fitzgerald B.P. (1995). Word of mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. Journal of Business Research, 32, 213-223.
  • Ford, J.B., Joseph, M., & Joseph, B. (1993). Service quality in higher education: A comparison of universities in the United States and New Zealand using SERVQUAL. In Enhancing knowledge development in marketing. American Marketing Association Educators' Proceedings, pp. 75-81.
  • Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
  • Gummesson, E. (1991). Truths and myths in service quality. Journal for Quality and Participation, 14(4), 28-33.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Grablowsky, B.J. (1979). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Oklahoma: Petroleum Publishing Company.
  • Hampton, G. (1993). Gap analysis of college student satisfaction as a measure of professional service quality. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 9,115-127.
  • Harvey, L. (2003). Editorial: Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 3-20.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M.F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331-44.
  • Kozak, M., Karatepe, O.M., & Avci, T. (2003). Measuring the quality of airline services: evidence from Northern Cyprus. Tourism Analysis, 8, 75-87.
  • Labi, A. (2007). Europe Challenges U.S. for foreign students. The Chronicle of Higher Education,54(5), 29-30.
  • Lam, T., & Zang, H.Q. (1998). Service quality of travel agents: The case of travel agents in Hong Kong. Journal of Tourism Management, 20, 341-349.
  • Likert, R. (1934). A simple and reliable method of scoring the turnstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 228.
  • Lo, Y.L., Cavana, R.Y., & Corbett, L.M. (2002). Quality and customer satisfaction in passenger rail services: Developing zones of tolerance for managing quality. IFSAM Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Lovelock, C, & Wirtz, J. (2007). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy. 6th Edition, Pearson Education Ltd. New Jersey, USA.
  • Mazzarrol, T. (1998). Critical success factors for international education marketing. International Journal of Education Management, 12(4), 163-175.
  • Nadiri, H., & Hussain, K. (2005). Perceptions of service quality in North Cyprus hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17(6), 469-480.
  • Navarro, M.M., Iglesias, M.P., & Torres, M.P.R. (2005). Measuring customer satisfaction in summer courses. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 53-65.
  • Norusis, M.J. (1985). Advance statistics guide: SPSS X. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • O'Neil, M.A., & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: A useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39-52.
  • Oldfield, B.M., & Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), 85-95.
  • Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
  • Parasuraman, A. (1986). Custömer-orientated organizational culture: A key to successful services marketing. In M. Venkatesan, D. M. Schmalensee, & C. Marshall (ed.). Creativity in services marketing: What's new, what works, what's developing (73-7). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Parasuraman, A. (2004). Assessing and improving service performance for maximum impact: Insights from a two-decade-long research journey. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(2), 45-52.
  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., & Zeithaml, V.A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420-450.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml VA., & Berry L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(41), 201-203.
  • Patterson, P.G., & Johnson, "L.W. (1993). Disconfirmation of expectations and the gap model of service quality: An integrated paradigm. Journal of Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 6, 90-99.
  • Peter, J.P. (1979). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 6-17.
  • Seymour, D.T. (1992). On Q: Causing quality in higher education. New York: Macmillan Press.
  • Söutar, G., & McNeil, M. (1996). Measuring service quality in a tertiary institution. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(1), 77-82.
  • Thomas, D.R.E. (1978). Strategy is different in service businesses. Harvard Business Review, 56(4) 158-165.
  • Tony, C., Stephen, M., & David, Y. (1994). Strategic planning in higher education: Who are the customer. The International Journal of Educational Management. 8(6), 29-36.
  • Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.
  • Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L.L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: The Free Press.
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi