Murat ŞEKER, Hassan MOHAMMADI, Pınar AKKOYUNLU

School resources family characteristic and student performance: Evidence from secondary school entrance exam in Turkey

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ortaöğretim Kurumları Öğrenci Seçme Smavı'na (OKS) katılan öğrencilerin başarısının hangi faktörlerden kaynaklandığını araştırmaktır. Veriler 810 ilkeğitim mezunuyla yapılan anket çalışması sonucu elde edilmiştir. Bu bilgilerden yararlanarak OKS'de yüksek puan alan ilkeğitim kurumu mezunlarının başarısı ile eğitim kurumu, öğrencinin ve ailenin nitelikleri arasındaki ilişki ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır

Eğitim kurumu kaynakları,aile özellikleri ve öğrenci başarısı: Türkiye'den ortaöğretim kurumları öğrenci seçme sınavı örneği

The paper examines the determinants of student achievement on the secondary school entrance exam (SSEE). The data for this project were collected through a survey of 810 primary-school graduates. The empirical work is carried out by forming a model on student achievement and three categories of school, student, and family characteristics from primary-school graduates who were successful in SSEE.

PDF

___

Aitkin, M., & Longford, N.T. (1986). Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of.the Royal Statistical Society, 149,1-43.
Altun, S.A., & Çakan, M. (2008). Factors affecting student success on exams: the case of successful cities on LGS/OSS exams. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 157-173.
Card, D., & Krueger, A.B. (1992). Does school quality matter? returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the united states. Journal of Political Economy, 100,1-40.
Coleman, J.S., (Eds.). (1996). Equality of educational opportunity, Washington, DC: US. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Collins, A.B. (2002). Does a school make a difference? Perceptions of an 'effective school'. European Educational Research Journal, 1 (3), 429-444.
Diaz, S.l. (1989). The home environment and Puertorican children's achievement: a researcher's diary, The National Association for Education Conference, Hulston, April-May.
Gelbal, S. (2008). Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyoekonomik Özelliklerinin Türkçe Başarısı Üzerinde Etkisi. Education and Science, 33 (150), 1-13.
Green, W.H. (1993). Econometric analysis, Second Edition, MacMillan.
Hanushek, E.A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions, Journal of Human Resources, 14, 351-388.
Hanushek, E.A. (1981). Throwing money at schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 19-41.
Hanushek, E.A. (1986). The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E.A. (1989a). Expenditures, efficiency, and equity in education: the federal government's role. American Economic Review, 79,46-51.
Hanushek, E.A. (1989b). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18, 45-51.
Hanushek, E.A. (1997). assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19,141-164.
Hanushek, E.A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. Economic Journal, 113, F64-F98.
Hanushek, E.A. (2006). Alternative school policies and the benefits of general cognitive skills. Economics of Education Review, 25(4), 447-462.
Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2003). Lessons about the design of state accountability systems, in Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of Accountability, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 126-151.
Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2006). School accountability and student performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Regional Economic Development, 2, 51-61.
Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2006). Early returns from school accountability, in Paul E. Peterson (Ed.), Generational Change: Closing the Test Score Gap, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little field Publishers, 143-166.
Hanushek, E.A., Rivkin, S.G., & Taylor, L.L. (1996). Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 611-627.
Hanushek, E.A., & Taylor, L. (1990). Alternative assessments of the performance of schools: measurement of state variations in achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 25,179-201.
Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). An exchange: part i: does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcome. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
Hortaçsu, N. (1995). Parents' education levels', parents' beliefs, and child outcomes, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156 (3), 373-383.
Şeker,R., Çınar, D., & Özkaya, A. (2004). Çevresel Faktörlerin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Başarı Düzeyine Etkileri. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 6-9 Temmuz 2004 İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.
Yenilmez, K., & Duman, A. (2008). İlköğretimde Matematik Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörlere İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 251-268.