The Problem Solving Steps, Related Activities Which Can be Used in These Steps and Their Evaluation

Bu çalışmada, ilköğretim düzeyinde sosyal bilgiler dersindeki problem çözme sürecinde kullanılabilecek ve araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilmiş dokuz genel adım ve bu adımlarla ilgili seksen iki etkinlik temel alınarak, öğretmenler tarafından kullanıldığı belirtilen etkinliklerden hangilerinin gerçekten sınıf ortamında kullanılıp kullanılmadığı ve kullanılmayan adım veya etkinliklerin kullanılmama sebeplerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Seksen iki etkinlikle ilgili olarak, öğretmenlerle yapılan görüşme ve sınıflarda yapılan gözleme dayanarak veriler toplanmış ve yorumlanmıştır. Öğretmenlerin problem çözme yöntemini, sosyal bilgiler dersinde belirttikleri ölçüde ve gerektiği kadar sistematik işlemedikleri belirlenmiştir. Bu yöntemi, yeterli bilgileri ve deneyimleri olmadığı için ve kolaylıkla uygulanabilecek bir problem çözme modelinin yokluğu nedeniyle uygulayamadıklarını açıklamışlardır. Bu zorluklan aşmanın yolu, bu konuda öğretmenlere hizmetiçi eğitim verilmesi ve problem çözme yöntemini kolaylıkla uygulayabilecekleri öğretmen kitapçıklarının hazırlanmasıdır.

Öğretim Yöntemi Olarak Kullanılan Problem Çözme Adımları, İlgili Etkinlikleri ve Değerlendirilmesi

In this study, based on nine general steps and their related eighty-two activities, which have been developed by the researcher and which can be used in the problem solving process deployed in elementary level social science courses, it is aimed to determine which of the activities stated by the participant teachers to have been performed are actually applied in the class setting, and to find out the reasons for their not applying part of these activities. The original eighty-two activities of problem solving methods are gathered under nine general steps. Based on the observations of classes and interviews with teachers about the eightytwo activities, data is gathered and interpreted. It is found that teachers are not applying the problem solving method and its steps as systematically as they state in the social science courses at the elementary school level. Two of the important results of the research are that teachers are not applying this method because of their lack of adequate knowledge and experience about it and also because of the lack of an easily applicable model for the method. To overcome this problem, in-service training courses should be organized or teacher guides should be published

___

  • Adair, J. (1997). Decision Making and Problem Solving. Londan: Institute of Personel and the Development.
  • Anderson, R. C. (1980). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Freeman, New York.
  • Arenofsky, J. (2001). Developing Your Problem Solving Skills. Career World 29(4): 18.
  • Aubusson, P. and W., C. (1999). Teacher beliefs about learning .and teaching in primary science and technology. Research in Science Education 22: 383-393.
  • Aydın B. (2000). Ülkemizde Matematik Eğitiminin Durumunu Tespit ve Geliştirme Çabalan, D.E.Ü. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-2, IZMIR.
  • Bagayoko, D. and Kelley, E.L., Saleem, H. (2000). Problem Solving Paradigm. College Teaching 48.
  • Barth, J.L. (1996). YÖK Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi. Ankara.
  • Barth, J.L. (1991). Elementary and Junior High/Middle School Social Studies Curriculum. Activities an Materials. (Third Edition), USA.
  • Binghman, A. (1958). Improving Children's Facility in Problem Solving. New York: Teachers Collage. Columbia University.
  • Bock, M. and Laurice, J. (2000). Student as a strategic participant on collaborative problem solving teams; an alternative model for middle and secondary schools. Intervention in School Clinic 36(1): 47, 7, 3 charts.
  • Britz, J. (1993). Problem Solving in Early Childhood Classrooms, Specialist Teaching Techniques.
  • Cahan, E. (1992). Dewey J. Human Development. Developmental Psychology 28 (2): 205-14.
  • Chin, C, & Goh, N. K., & Chia, K. S., & Lee, K.W.L., & SOH, K. C. (1994). Pre-service teacher's use of problem solving in primary science teaching. Research in Science Education, 24: 41-50.
  • Clark, CM. and Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers Thought Processes. M. C. Wittrock (ed.).. Handbook of Research on Teaching 255-296.
  • Compagne, A. B. and Klopfer, L. E. (1997). A sixty year perspective on three issues in science education, reflective thinking and problem solving. Science Education,8l(l)3S-53.
  • Dewey, J, (1910). How We Think? D. C. Heath, (Restated and Rissued in 1933), Boston.
  • Dewey, J. (1930). (Translation From English to Turkish A. Başman). Mektep ve Cemiyet. MEB Yayınlan, istanbul.
  • Fensel, D. and Motta. (1997). Enrico. Structured Development of Problem Solving Methods. http://spuds.cpsc.ucalgarv.ca/KAW/ KAW98/fensell2/.
  • Fidan, N. (1980). Giriş Davranışları ve Öğretme Yöntemlerinin Fen Başarısına Etkileri. Tubitak, Ankara.
  • Gagne, R. M. (1970). The Conditions Of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.,
  • Greenberg, P. (1992). Why not academic preschool, autocrasy or democrasy in the classroom. Young Children.l7(2):54-64, USA.
  • Gustafson, B.J. and Rowell, P. (1998). Elementary children's technological problem solving: selecting an inital course of action. Research in Science Technological Education 16: 151-165.
  • Harty, H. and Kloostermen, P. and Matkin, V. (1991). Science problem solving approaches in elementary school classrooms. School and Mathematics 91: 10-14.
  • Hicks, M. J. (1994). Problem Solving in Business and Management. Thames University.
  • Jonassen, H.D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 48(4): 63-85.
  • Kalayci.N. (2005). How do elementary school students solve illstructured problems? Gazi Eğitim Eakültesi Dergisi.25 (1)123-147
  • Kneeland, S. (1999). Solving Problems. Published in How to Books Ltd. Newtwc Place, Magdalen road, Oxford. OX4 IRE, UK.
  • Laat, J.and Walters, J. (1995). Science teaching self efficacy. Research in Science Education 25: 453-464.
  • Lawrens, F. (1990). Science teaching techniques associated with higher. Order thinking skills. Journal Research in Science Teaching 27:835-847.
  • Lee, K., et al. (2000). Science teachers and problem solving in elementary schools in Singapore. Research in Science Technology Education 18 (1): 113.
  • Lovoie, D. (1993). The development theory, application of a cognitive-network model of predicition in problem solving in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 767-785.
  • M.E.B. (2005). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Eğitim Programı, Ankara.
  • Morgan, C. T. (1961). Instroduction to Psychology. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc. 2 nd. Ed., New York.
  • Moyles, J. (1989). Just Playing: The Role and Status of Play in Early Childhood Education. Milton Keynes, Open Universty Press (Refer to 53-67).
  • Newmann, F.M. (1988). Can depth replace coverage in the high school curriculum? Phi Delta Kappan 69: 345-348.
  • Newton, D. P.and Gott, R. (1989). Process in lower school science textbooks. British Educational Research Journal 15: 249-258.
  • Phillips, J.A. (2000). Teaching Thinking Skills in Schools the Infusion Approach. University Malaya, Malaysia.
  • Ramsey, G.L. and Shroyer, M. G. and Staves, J. R. (1996). A quality study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education 80: 283-315.
  • Rutherfort, F. J. and Ahigren A. (1990). Science for All Americans. Oxford University., New York.
  • Seefeldt, C. and Barbour, N. (1986). Early Childhood Education an Introduction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. USA.
  • Shor I. (1980). Critical Teaching in Eve Day life. Southend Press, Boston.
  • Stevens, M. (1998). How to be a Better Problem Solver. Cogan Page. USA. Swartz R. and Perkins D. (1990). Teaching Thinking Issues and Approaches. Pacific Grove Midwest Publications.
  • Tegano, D. and Sowyers, J. and Moran, J. (1989). Problem finding and solving in play, the teachers role. Childhood Education, 162,66 (2): 92-97.
  • Thomas, E. L. and Robinson, H. A. (1972). Improving Reading in Every Class a Source Book for Teachers. Allyn Bacon, Boston.
  • West, F. and Idol, L. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of middly handicapped at risk students. Remedial and Special Education 11: 22-23.
  • Wilkes, G. (ed.) (1979). Collins Dictionary of the English Language, Middlesex, Penguin Books, USA.