Prospective teachers’ noticing with respect to the student roles underlined in the elementary mathematics program: Use of video- cases

Bu nitel çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen eğitiminde video örnek olay kullanımı neticesinde,matematik öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretim matematik programında vurgulanan öğrenci rolleriüzerine fark ettikleri noktaları incelemektir. Çalışmada teorik çerçeve olarak van Es ve Sherin(2002) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Fark Etme Teorisi’nden yararlanılmıştır. Veriler, büyük birdevlet üniversitesinde öğrenim görmekte olan 15 son sınıf matematik öğretmen adayındanyazılı yansıtıcı görüşler ve mülakatlar neticesinde toplanmıştır. Bulgular, öğretmen adaylarınıngerçek matematik sınıf ortamlarını analiz etme şansı yakaladıklarında, ilköğretim matematikprogramında vurgulanan öğrenci rollerine yönelik çeşitli noktaları fark edebildiklerinigöstermiştir.

Öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretim matematik programında vurgulanan öğrenci rolleri üzerine fark ettikleri noktalar: Video örnek olay kullanımı

The purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine what prospective mathematicsteachers noticed with respect to the student roles underlined in the elementary mathematicsprogram when video-case based pedagogy was employed in teacher education. The theoreticalframework employed in this study was Learning to Notice framework developed by van Es andSherin (2002). The data was collected through reflection papers and interviews from 15 seniorprospective teachers enrolled at a large state university. The findings indicated that prospectiveteachers could notice several issues related to student roles underlined in the elementarymathematics program when they were provided with a learning environment to analyze realmathematics classrooms.

___

  • Alsawaie, O. N. & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effects of video-based approach on prospective teachers‘ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 223-241, doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  • Arellano, E. L., Barcenal, T. L., Bilbao, P. P., Castellano, M. A., Nichols, S., & Tippins, D. J. (2001). Case-based pedagogy as a context for collaborative inquiry in the Philippines. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 502-528.
  • Baran, E. (2006). The effects of video-case based instruction on preservice teachers’ achievement of course content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Baran, B. (2007). Evaluation of online communities of practice environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Boling, E. C. (2007). Linking technology, learning, and stories: Implications from research on hypermedia video-cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 189–200, doi:10.1016/j. tate.2006.04.015
  • Bulut, S., & Koc, Y. (2006b). Yeni İlköğretim Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programına Genel Bakış. Abece Eğitim ve Ekin Dergisi, 241, 2-6.
  • Butler, M. B., Lee, S., & Tippins, D. J. (2006). Case-based methodology as an instructional strategy for understanding diversity: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Multicultural Education, 13(3), 20-26.
  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago.
  • Harrington, H. L. (1999). Case analyses as a performance of thought. In Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases, eds. M.A. Lundeberg, B.B. Levin, and H. L. Harrington. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Harrington, H. L., & Garrison, J. W. (1992). Cases as shared inquiry: A dialogical model of teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 715-735.
  • Hill, H. C., & Collopy, R. M. B. (2003). Learning content in the context of practice: A videocase curriculum example. Paper prepared for the 2003 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Llinares, S. & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers‘ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 177-196, doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0
  • Lundeberg, M. A., & Levin, B. B. (2003). Prompting the development of preservice teachers‘ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based learning, and technology. In J. Raths, & A. C. McAninch (Vol. Ed.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education: Vol. 6. Advances in teacher education (p. 23-42). CT: Information Age.
  • Manouchehri, A. (2002). Developing teaching knowledge through peer discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 715–737.
  • Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235–263.
  • Mayo, J. A. (2004). Using case-based instruction to bridge the gap between theory and practice in psychology of adjustment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 137–146, doi: 10.1080/10720530490273917
  • Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In Sikula J. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, p. 722-746. New York: Macmillan.
  • Moran, A., Dallat, J., & Abbott, L. (1999). Newly qualified teachers in post-primary schools in Northern Ireland: The support provided for their needs and their own vision for induction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2/3).
  • Richardson, V., & Kile, R. S. (1999). Learning from videocases. In Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases, eds. M.A. Lundeberg, B.B. Levin, and H. Harrington. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • San, M. M. (1999). Japanese beginning teachers‘ perceptions of their preparation and professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(1).
  • Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J.H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (p. 1–30). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In Lester F. K. (ed.) The Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, p. 157-224. CT: Information Age.
  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107– 125, doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  • Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 373-394, doi: 10.1007/ s10857-008-9079-7
  • Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 18, 457-521.
  • Talim Terbiye Kurulu (TTKB) (2006). MEB müfredat geliştirme süreci. Retrieved May 01,2008, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/programlar/
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ learning to notice in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers‘ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155-176, doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi