Pre-service science teachers' views and content knowledge about models and modeling

Bu çalışmanın amacı, fen öğretmen adaylarının modeller ve modelleme hakkındaki görüş ve bilgilerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın verileri yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve açık-uçlu anket kullanarak yedi katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, katılımcıların modeller hakkındaki görüşlerinde farklılıklar ve yetersizlikler olduğunu ortaya koymuş ve katılımcıların bilimsel modellerin özgün karakterlerini belirleyemediklerini göstermiştir. Yine sonuçlar, öğretmen adaylarının bir öğretim modelini tercih ederken modelin estetik çekiciliğine, bilimsel içeriğine ve kullanılabilirliğine dikkat ettiklerini göstermektedir. Bulgular, fen öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programları sürecinde daha fazla modelleme aktivitelerine katılmasını ve daha fazla modelleme deneyimi kazanmasını ve böylece modeller ve modelleme hakkında sahip oldukları içerik bilgilerinin geliştirilmesini öngörmektedir.

Fen öğretmen adaylarının modeller ve modelleme hakkındaki görüşleri ve içerik bilgileri

The aim of this study was to investigate pre-service science teachers views and knowledge of models and modeling. The data were collected from seven participants through semistructured interviews and an open-ended questionnaire. The results indicated that variations and deficiencies existed among the participants views and knowledge of models. The participants were unable to distinguish exclusive characteristics of scientific models. It was also found that the pre-service science teachers favored a teaching model according to model s aesthetic appeal, scientific context, and practicality. It is recommended that pre-service science teachers should engage in more modeling activities and gain more modeling experiences throughout their training programs to improve their content knowledge of models and modeling.

___

  • AAAS (1990). Science for All Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Aktan, M. B., & Eichinger, D. C. (2004). An analysis of the uses and interpretations of science models in U. S. high school science textbooks. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Aktan, M. B. (2005). Investigation of prospective teachers’ knowledge and understanding of models and modeling and their attitudes towards the use of models in science education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, IN.
  • Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75(6), 631-647.
  • Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379-1401.
  • Danusso, L., Testa, I., & Vicentini, M. (2010). Improving Prospective Teachers’ Knowledge about Scientific Models and Modelling: Design and evaluation of a teacher education intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 871-905.
  • De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. H. (2001). Developing preservice teachers’ content knowledge and PCK of models and modeling. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears? International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 187-203.
  • Giles, D. C. (2002). Advanced research methods in psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.
  • Harrison, A. G. (2001). How do Teachers and Textbook Writers Model Scientific Ideas for Students? Research in Science Education, 31, 401-435.
  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models? School Science & Mathematics, 98(8), 420-429.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007a). The change of science teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819-1846.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007b). Science teachers’ knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 99-122.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of Experienced Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Models of the Solar System and the Universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321-1342.
  • Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of ‘the atom’. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993- 1009.
  • Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.
  • Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.
  • Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369-1386.
  • Justi, R. S., & Van Driel, J. H. (2005a). A case study of the development of a beginning chemistry teacher’s knowledge about models and modelling. Research in Science Education 35(2-3), 197-219.
  • Justi, R. S., & Van Driel, J. H. (2005b). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549-573.
  • Justi, R. S., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). The use of the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education 22(4), 437-450.
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1997). Research in Education: A conceptual introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2007). Effects of model-based teaching on pre-service physics teachers’ conceptions of the moon, moon phases, and other lunar phenomena. International Journal of Science Education 29(5), 555-593.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  • Smit, J. J. A., & Finegold, M. (1995). Models in physics: Perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 621-634.
  • Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harrè, and L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology (pp. 9-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Smith, J. A., Harrè, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Rethinking Methods in Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Thorley, N. R., & Stofflett, R. T. (1996). Representation of the conceptual change model in science teacher education. Science Education, 80(3), 317-339.
  • Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141-1153.
  • Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, V. (2002). Experienced teachers’ knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255-1272.
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi