Farklı Öğrenim Seviyesindeki Öğrencilerin Aritmetikten Cebire Geçiş Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması: Denklem Örneği

Öğrencilerin ilköğretimin ikinci kademesi ile birlikte soyutlaşan matematiği kavrayabilmelerinde, aritmetikten cebire geçiş önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı öğrenim seviyesindeki öğrencilerin denklem konusunda belirlenen problemlere ilişkin çözüm stratejilerini değerlendirerek aritmetikten cebire geçiş düzeylerini karşılaştırmaktır. Bu amaçla, ilk olarak, literatür desteği ile çalışmada kullanılan problemlerin çözüm stratejilerine ilişkin kategoriler belirlendi. Daha sonra öğrencilerin problemlere ilişkin kullandıkları çözüm stratejileri değerlendirilerek, aritmetikten cebire geçişin hangi seviyesinde olduklarına karar verildi. Örnek olay metodolojisiyle yürütülen çalışma, 2006-2007 güz döneminde Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi'ndeki bir ilçeye bağlı iki ilköğretim okulunda yapılmıştır. Araştırma, her biri 60 öğrenciden oluşan 5., 6., 7. ve 8. sınıfta öğrenim gören toplam 240 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, öğrencilerin öğrenim seviyesi arttıkça aritmetikten cebire geçişin olumlu yönde geliştiği ancak öğrenme ortamlarında kullanılan sınırlı çözüm stratejilerinden dolayı hiçbir öğrenim seviyesinde bekle nen geçişin gerçekleşmediği saptanmıştır.

A Comparision of Different Grade Students' Transition Levels from Arithmetic to Algebra: A Case for 'Equation' Subject

In understanding mathematics which gets more abstract with grades, transition from arithmetic to algebra plays an important role for elementary school students. The aim of this study is to compare the transition levels from arithmetic to algebra for students at different grades by evaluating their problem solving strategies related to the determined problems on 'equation' subject. With this aim, categories of solution strategies of problems used in this study were firstly defined by help of the related literature. Then, by evaluating students' use of the solution strategies associated with problems, their transition levels from arithmetic to algebra were decided. Within a case study research methodology, the study was carried out with two cohort schools in a district of the Eastern Karadeniz Region of Turkey in the fall semester of 2006-2007. The sample consists of totally 240 students drawn from Grade 5, Grade 6, Grade 7 and Grade 8 whose distributions are equal (60 students for each grade). As a consequence, it was elicited that there was positive tendency for transition level from arithmetic to algebra with an increase in student grade. However, because of the limited solution strategies used in learning environments, it was drawn out that none of the grades showed the expected transition.

___

  • Bernardo, A. ve Okagaki, L. (1994). Roles of symbolic knowledge and problem-information context in solving word problems. Journel of Educational Psychology, 86, 212-220.
  • Booth, L.R. (1988). Children's difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F. Coxford (Eds.). The Ideas of Algebra, K-12 (pp, 20-32). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Cooper, T. J., Boulton-Lewis, G., Athew, B., Willss, L. ve Mutch, S. (1997). The transition arithmetic to algebra: Initial understandings of equals, operations and variable. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 21(2), 89-96.
  • Dede, Y. ve Argün, Z. (2003). Cebir, öğrencilere niçin zor gelmektedir? Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24:180-185.
  • EARGED. (1996). İlköğretim (5+3) matematik programı değerlendirme raporu: Ankara.
  • Falkner, K., Levi, L. ve Carpenter, T. (1999). Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, December, 232-236.
  • Filloy, E. ve Rojana, T. (İ989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19 - 25.
  • Hersovics, N. ve Linchevski, L. (1994). A Cognative gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59-78.
  • Kieran, C. ve Chaloug, L. (1993). Prealgebra: The transitions from arithmetic to algebra. In D.T. Owens (Eds.).Research Ideas for the Classroom: Middle Grades Mathematics, (pp 179-198) .New York: Macmillan.
  • Kieran, C. (1989). The Early Learning of Algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner ve C. Kieran (Eds.).Resaearch Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 33-56). Reston,VA: NCTM.
  • Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A. Grouws (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan.
  • Linchevski, L. ve Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmeticand algebra: operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 38-65.
  • Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, ve L. Lee (Eds.). Approaches to Algebra (pp.65-111). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA:NCTM.
  • NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Sfard, A. (1987). Two conceptions of mathematical notions: Operational and structural. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 162-169), Montreal.
  • Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: confront historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14,15-39.
  • Sutherland, R. ve Rojana, T. (1993). A Spreadsheet approach to solving algebra problems. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 12(4), 351-383.
  • Swadener, M. ve Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, mathematics education and the task of developing pupils' personalities: an indonesian perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 193-208.
  • Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In B. Moses (Eds.). Algebraic Thinking Grades K-12 (pp. 7-14). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Usiskin, Z. (1997). Doing algebra in grades K-4. In B. Moses (Eds.). Algebraic Thinking, Grades K-12 (pp. 5-7).Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Van Amerom, B., A. (2002). Reinvention of Early Algebra: Developmental research on the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Vance, J. (1998). Number operations from on algebraic perspective. Teaching Children Mathemetics, 4, 282-285.
  • Wagner, S. (1983). What are these things called variables? Mathematics Teacher, October, 474-478.