Eğitim süreci öğrenci değerlendirmeleri ölçeği’nin türkçeye uyarlama çalışması ve etkili öğretim elemanlarını tanımlayan alt boyutların belirlenmesi

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yükseköğretimde kaliteyi artırmaya yönelik çalışmaların önemli bir parçası haline gelen öğretim elemanlarının yeterliklerine ilişkin öğrenci algılarını belirlemek amacıyla tüm dünyada en sık kullanılan ölçüm aracı olan SEEÖ’nün Türkçeye uyarlama çalışmalarının yapılması ve öğrenciler tarafından en iyi ve en kötü olarak algılanan öğretim elemanlarını ayırmada en etkili olan öğretim etkinlikleri boyutlarının ESÖD aracılığıyla belirlenmesidir. Bu amaçla, toplam 693 üniversite öğrencisinden elde edilen verilere yönelik yapılan analizler ölçeğin 9 alt boyutlu yapısını büyük oranda desteklemiş ve Türk üniversite öğrencileri için kullanılabilir olduğunu göstermiştir. Yapılan diskriminat analizi sonuçları ise öğrenciler tarafından en iyi ve en kötü olarak belirlenen öğretim elemanlarını en iyi ayıran öğretim etkinliği alt boyutlarının sırasıyla isteklilik, sınıf içi etkileşim, öğrenme/akademik yarar ve planlılık/açıklık alt boyutları olduğunu göstermiştir.

Turkish adaptation of student evaluations of educational quality questionnaire and determination of teaching dimensions defining efficient college ınstructors

The purpose of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of SEEQ for Turkish College students and to determine the dimensions that best discriminate the instructors who were nominated as the best and the worst by students. Data was collected from a total of 693 college students. Both explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the 9-factor structure of SEEQ observed in the previous studies. Reliability scores ranging from .77 to .95 along with the validity results were supportive of the equivalency of Turkish and English forms of the SEEQ. Finally, although all subscales were efficient in discriminating the instructors nominated as the best and the worst, four subscales emerged especially important; Instructor Enthusiasm, Group Interaction, Learning/Value and Organization/clarity.

PDF

___

Apodaca, P. & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: İntegration of uni- and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30, (6), 723–748.
Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205–213.
Blair, T.R., Rupley, W.H. & Nichols, W. (2007). The effective teacher of reading: Considering the “What” and “How” of ınstruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(5), 432–438.
Bolyard, J. J. & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2008). A review of the literature on mathematics and science teacher quality. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(4), 509-535.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö., Özkahveci, Ö. & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4 (2), 207-239.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213-229.
Creemers, B. P. M. & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modeling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347– 366.
Devlin, M. & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, (2), 111 - 124.
Epting, L., Zinn, T., Buskist, C. & Buskist, W. (2004). Student perspectives on the distinction between ideal and typical teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 181-183.
Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the student’s view. Research in Higher Education, 5, 243-288.
Feldman, K. A. 1988. Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s viewpoint. Research in Higher Education 28:291-344.
Feldman, K. A. (1996). Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 41–50.
Flynn, N. (2007) What do effective teachers of literacy do? Subject knowledge and pedagogical choices for literacy. Literacy, 41 I(3), 137-146.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 743-751.
Gökçe, E. (2002). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Görüşlerine Göre Öğretmenlerin Etkililiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1-2),111-119.
Helterbran, V. R. (2008). The ideal proffessor: Student perceptions of effective instructor practices, attitudes and skills. Education, 129 (1), 125-138.
Hobson, S. M. & Talbot, D. M. (2001). Understanding student evaluations: What all faculty should know. College Teaching, 49(1), 26-31.
Karakelle, S. (2005). Öğretmenlerin Etkili Öğretmen Tanımlarının Etkili Öğretmenlik Boyutlarına Göre İncelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30(135), 1-10.
Kızıltepe, Z. (2002). İyi ve Etkili Öğretmen. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27(126), 10-14.
Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29 (3), 480-488.
Lockheed M. E. & A. Komenan. A. (198). Teaching quality and student achievement in Africa: The case of Nigeria and Swaziland. Teaching and Teacher Education. 5(2), 93-113.
Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students’ evaluations of college teaching: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 264-279.
Marsh, H. W. 1983. Multidimensional ratings of teaching effectiveness by students from different academic settings and their relation to student/course/instructor characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 150-166.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Applicability paradigm: Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness in different countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 465-473.
Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R. P. Perry & J C. Smart (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp.319-384). New York: Springer.
Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin, M. (1997). Student evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In Perry, P. R., and Smart, J. C. (Eds.), Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, (pp. 241-320). Agathon, New York.
Marsh, H. W. & Hocevar, D. (1991). Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean rating of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching & Teacher Education 7 (4): 303-14.
Marsh, H. W. & Overall, J. U. (1980). Validity of students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Cognitive and affective criteria. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 468-475.
Moore, M. L., Moore, R. S. & McDonald, R. (2008). Student characteristics and expectations of university classes: A free elicitation approach. College Student Journal, 42 (1), 82-89.
Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. M. & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching: Comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72 (2), 69-92.
Murray, H. G. (1991). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 7, pp. 135-172). New York: Agathon.
Nitsaisook, M., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (1986). Teacher effectiveness research: An example from Thailand. International Review of Education, 32,(4),423-438.
Okpala, C.O. & Ellis, R.R. (2005). The perceptions of college students on teacher quality: A focus on teacher qualifications. Education, 126 (2), 374-383.
Oktay, İ. & Yazçayır, N. (2008). Öğrencilere Göre Eetkili Öğretmen Özellikleri. Milli Eğitim, 180, 8-23.
Oliveras, O. J. (2003). A Conceptual and Analytic Critique of Student Ratings of Teachers in the USA with Implications for Teacher Effectiveness and Student Learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, (2), 233-245.
Onural, H. (2006). Öğretmen Adaylarının İdeal Öğretmen Niteliklerine İlişkin Görüşleri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 31(327), 29-35.
Overall, J. U. & Marsh, H. W. (1980). Students’ evaluations of instruction: A longitudinal study of their stability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-325.
Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi II, Kaan Kitabevi.
Özgüngör, S. (2010). Identifying dimensions of students’ ratings that best predict students’ self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 38, 146-163.
Penny, A. R. (2003). Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: Four shortcomings of SRT research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (3), 399-411.
Reynolds, D. & Teddlie, C. (2000). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D.
Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387-415.
Sproule, R. (2000) Student evaluation of teaching: A methodological critique of conventional practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(50).
Telli, S., Brok, P. & Çakıroğlu, J. (2008). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the ideal teacher. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 118-129.
Tomcho, T. J. & Foels, R. (2008). Assessing effective teaching of psychology: A meta-analytic integration of learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology 35(4), 286-296.
Ubuz, B. & Sarı, S. (2009). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının İyi Öğretmen Olma ile İlgili Görüşleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 53-61.
Watkins, D. (1994). Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A cross-cultural persoective. Research in Higher Education, 35, 251-266.
Watkins D. & Akande, A. (1992) Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A Nigerian investigation. Higher Education 24 , 453-463.
Wayne, A. J. & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains. Review of Educational Research, (73)1 , 89-122.
Weimer, M. (1997). Integration of teaching and research: Myth, reality, and possibiltiy. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, (Winter97), 72, 53-62.
Young, S. Y. & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 670-686.
Xin, T., Xu, Z. & Tatsuoka, K. K. (2004). Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement, and cognitive skills: A rule-space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(3), 205 - 223.)
Yates, G. C. R. (2005). How obvious: Personal reflections on the database of educational psychology and effective teaching. Educational Psychology, 25 (6), 681-700.