Davet/Engel İndeksinin Türkçe'ye Uyarlanması

Bu çalışmanın amacı 10 maddeden oluşan 2 faktörlü Davet/Engel İndeksi'ni (DEİ) Türkçe'ye adapte etmektir. Bu amaçla ölçek öncelikle Türkçe'ye çevrilmiş daha sonra 3 ayrı pilot çalışma yapılmıştır. İlk pilot çalışmada yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ve güvenilirlik çalışması sonuçları 2 maddenin çıkarılabileceğini göstermiştir. İkinci pilot çalışmada, bu iki maddenin geçerliğe katkısı düşünülerek, bu maddelerin varlığında alternatif faktör yapılarının varlığı araştırılmıştır. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi (EFA) sonuçları 2 faktörlü yapıya işaret etmiştir. Üçüncü pilot çalışmada yapılan DFA sonuçları da 2 faktörlü yapıyı desteklemiştir. Maddelerarası ortalama korelasyon değerleri iç tutarlığın yeterli düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir Yapılan ölçme değişmezliği analizi, bir maddenin kızlar ve erkekler için değişmezlik göstermediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu maddeye ait yük cinsiyet bakımından serbest bırakıldığında, 2-faktörlü yapının kızlar ve erkekler için aynı olduğunu ortaya koymuştır. Ayrıca, DEİ ya ait 2 faktörün öğrencilerin Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi ile ölçülen öz-yeterlik algılarını pozitif olarak yordadığı bulunmuştur

Adapting of Inviting/Disinviting Index into Turkish *

The aim of the present study was to examine adaptability of Inviting/Disinviting Index with 10 items in two factors into Turkish. For the specified purpose, the instrument was first, translated into Turkish, then 3 separate pilot studies were conducted. In the first pilot study, based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses, two items were identified as candidates for item deletion. In the second pilot study, due to validity concerns, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine whether alternative factor structures exist in the presence of these two items. The EFA provided evidence for twofactor structure with 10 items. Finally, in the third pilot study, CFA supported two-factor structure of Turkish version of the IDI. Mean interitem correlations were deemed acceptable. In addition, one of the items was found to be non-invariant across gender. The twofactor IDI was found to be invariant across gender permitting the loading of this item to vary. Regression analysis indicated that factors of the IDI were positive predictors of students' self-efficacy as measured by Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.

PDF

___

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485-499.
Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A. C., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 142-153.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8 user's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
Kıran, D. & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students' science self-efficacy and its sources: Examination of gender difference, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 619-630.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. 1985. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self- concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, don'ts, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 97-110.
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pajares, F. (1994). Inviting self-efficacy: The role of invitations in the development of confidence and competence in writing. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice 3,13-24.
Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W.J. (1993) Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 810-813.
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. and L. S. Wrightsman (1991). 'Criteria for scale selection and evaluation'. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver and L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 1-16.
Schmidt, J. Shields, C. & Ciechalski, J. (1998). The inviting-disinviting index: A study of validity and reliability. . Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 5, 31-42.
Sungur, S. (2004). An implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting confidence in school: Invitations as a Critical Source of the Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Entering Middle School Students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12, 7-16.
Valiante, G., & Pajares, F. (2002). Inviting one's self and inviting others: Influence of gender, grade level, and gender orientation. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 8, 41-55.
Valiante, G., & Pajares, F. (1999). The Inviting/Disinviting Index: Instrument Validation and Relation to Motivation and Achievement, Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 6, 28-47.
Wiemer, D., & Purkey, W. (1994). Love Thyself as Thy Neighbor?: Self-other orientations of inviting behaviors. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 3, 25-33.
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215-246.