___

• Yaylı, D. (2012). A hands on experience of English language teachers as researchers. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(2), 255-271.
• Wyatt, M. (2010). An English teacher’s developing self-efficacy beliefs in using groupwork. System, 38(4).
• Wilby, P. (1989). The secret of successful schools. Reproduced in The Straits Times, 4.
• Waugh, R. F. (2002). Creating a scale to measure motivation to achieve academically: Linking attitudes and behaviours using Rasch measurement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 65-86.
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C. ve Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017.
• Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G. ve Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 41(4), 213.
• Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
• Tangen, D. (2007). A contextual measure of teacher efficacy for teaching primary level students who have ESL (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Queensland University of Technology.
• Tabachnick, B. ve Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Swanson, P. B. (2010). Efficacy and language teacher attrition: A case for mentorship beyond the classroom. The NECTFL Review.
• Suslu, S. (2006). Motivation of ESL teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(1).
• Stremmel, A. (2002). Nurturing professional and personal growth through inquiry. Young Children, 57(5), 62-70.
• Seider, S. N. ve Lemma, P. (2004). Perceived effects of action research on teachers’ professional efficacy, inquiry mindsets and the support they received while conducting projects to intervene into student learning. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 219-238.
• Roth, W. M. (2007). Doing teacher-research: A handbook for perplexed practitioners. Sense Publishers.
• Richards, J. C. ve Lockhard, C. (1994). Reflective teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Reis-Jorge, J. (2007). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher-research and self-perceptions as enquiring practitioners - A longitudinal case study. Teachers and Teacher Education, 23.
• Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R. ve Osborne, J. (2004). Science education practitioners’ views of research and its influence on their practice. York: Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
• Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 65-91.
• Praver, M. ve Oga-Baldwin, W. (2008). What motivates language teachers? Investigating work satisfaction and second language pedagogy. Polyglossia, 14.
• Pennington, M. C. (1992). Motivating English language teachers through job enrichment. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 5(3).
• Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
• Nunan, D. ve Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher. Cambridge University Press.
• Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. Prentice Hall.
• McNamara, O. (2002). Evidence-based practice through practice-based evidence. O. McNamara (Ed), Becoming an Evidence-based Practitioner içinde (s. 15-26).
• Maharaj-Sharma, R. (2011). Case study of five science teachers’ understandings of classroom research and their willingness to become active classroom researchers. Asian Social Science, 7(9).
• Macaro, E. ve Mutton, T. (2002). Developing language teachers through a co-researcher model. Language Learning Journal, 25, 27-39.
• Liu, K. (2009). Action research: Impact of holistic method on teacher candidates’ self-efficacy. 18th Annual Conference of the Global Awareness Society International konferansında sunulmuş bildiri.
• Lee, J. (2009). Teachers’ sense of efficacy in teachıng English, perceived English language proficiency, and attitudes toward the English language: A case of Korean public elementary school teachers (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ohio State University.
• Lankshear, C. ve Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation. Open University Press.
• Korucu, S. (2011). The use of action research as a model in the professional development of an English teacher: A case study (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
• Kline, P. (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
• Kemmis, S. (1980). Action research in retrospect and prospect. Australian Association for Research in Education toplantısında sunulmuş bildiri, Sydney, Australia.
• Jie-ying, Y. (2011). Teacher efficacy and college English teaching. Asia-Pacific Science and Culture Journal, 1(1).
• Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R. ve Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(3), 404-420.
• Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17.
• Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching. Essex: Longman Press.
• Hardre, P., Beesley, A., Miller, R. ve Pace, T. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive Universities. The Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1).
• Güven, S. ve Çakır, O. (2012). A study on primary school English teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Science, 37(163), 43-52.
• Guba, E. G. ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 163-194.
• Gibson, S. ve Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
• Gherali-Roussos, E. (2003). The motivation of English language teachers in Greek secondary schools (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Nothingham University.
• Gebhard, J. ve Oprandy, R. (1999). Exploring our teaching. J. Gebhard ve R. Oprandy (Ed.), Language teaching awareness: A guide to exploring beliefs and practices içinde (s. 3-19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Gao, X. ve Chow, A. W. K. (2011). Primary school English teachers’ research engagement. ELT Journal, 66(2).
• Freeman, D. (1996). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. K. M. Bailey ve D. Nunan (Ed.), Voices from the language classroom içinde (s. 88-115). Cambridge University Press.
• Fallout, J. (2010). Strategies for teacher motivation. The Language Teacher, 34(6).
• Edwards, C. ve Willis, J. (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Palgrave: MacMillan.
• Creswell, J. W. ve Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
• Cooper-Twamley, S. M. (2009). Action research and its impact on teacher efficacy: A mixed methods case study (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Baylor University.
• Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of Efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323-337.
• Chagon, C. T. (2005). Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 257-272.
• Carr, W. ve Kemmis, S. (1985). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
• Cabaroğlu, N. (2014). Professional development through action research: Impact on self-efficacy. System, (4), 79-84.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (3. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
• Burns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in Language Teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York and London: Routledge.
• Brown, D. ve Lee, H. (1994). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.
• Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge University Press.
• Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 319-429.
• Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388.
• Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 731-747.
• Borg, S. (2006). Conditions for teacher research. English Teaching Forum, 4, 22-27.
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(02), 81-109.
• Bernaus, M., Wilson, A. ve Gardner, R. C. (2009). Teachers’ motivation, classroom strategy use, students’ motivation and second language achievement. Porta Linguarum, 12, 25-36.
• Benton, J. ve Wasko, J. (2000). Anything worthwhile takes time: Eight schools discuss impacts and impressions of doing action research. Networks: An Online Journal of Teacher Research, 3(1).
• Ashton, P., Buhr, D. ve Crocker, L. (1984). Teachers' sense of efficacy: A self- or norm-referenced construct. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29-41.
• Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2).
• Atay, D. (2006). Teachers’ professional development: Partnerships in research. TESL-EJ, 10(2).
• Allwright, D. (2007). Practitioner research. Language Teaching Research, 11(1).
• Allwright, D. (1998). Contextual factors in classroom language learning: An overview. K. Malmkjar ve J. Williams (Ed.), Context in Language Learning and Understanding içinde (s. 115-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Allwright, D. (1993) Integrating ‘research’ and ‘pedagogy’: appropriate criteria and practical possibilities. J. Edge ve K. Richards (Ed.), Teachers develop teachers research içinde (s. 125- 135). Oxford: Heinemann.
• Allwright, D. ve Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89(3).
• Allison, D. ve Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research?. TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-81.
• Akyel, A. S. (2000). Collaboration to Explore Teaching: A Case Study Report. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1).
• Akbulut, Y., Şahin, Y. L. ve Erişti, B. (2010). Development of a scale to investigate cybervictimization among online social utility members. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 46-59.