___

• Akyıldız, M. (2009). PIRLS 2001 Testinin Yapı Geçerliğinin Ülkelerarasi Karşılaştırılması (The comparison of construct validity of the PIRLS test between Countries). Journal of Education Faculty Of Yuzuncu Yil University, 6, 18-47.
• Allalouf, A., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1999). Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(3), 185-198.
• Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence,improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-73.
• Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press. Byrne B.M (1994). Structural equation modelling with eqs and eqs/windows: basic concepts, applications, and programming. California: Sage. Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 9, 233-255.
• Çetin, B. (2010). Cross-cultural structural parameter invariance on PISA 2006 student questionnaires. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 38, 71-89
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları (Multi-variance statistics SPPS and LISREL applications for social sciences). Ankara: PeGem Yayıncılık.
• Ercikan, K. (2002). Disentangling sources of differential item functioning in multi-language assessments. International Journal of Testing, 2(3&4), 199-215.
• Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tahtam, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55 Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology: A Review and Comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131-152.
• Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(3), 296-309.
• Jöreskog, K.G, & Sörbom D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Kelloway, K. E. (1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215–224.
• Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modelling. (In L.G. Grim & P.R. Yarnold, Eds), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (p.227-259). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling: Methodology in the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311- 360.
• Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.J. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Robin, F., Sireci, S. G., & Hambleton, R. K. (2003). Evaluating the equivalence of different language versions of a credentialing exam. International Journal of Testing, 3(1), 1-20.
• Schulz, W. (2003). Validating questionnaire constructs in international studies. two examples from pisa 2000. Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Chicago, 21-25 April. Schulz, W. (2005). Testing parameter invariance for questionnaire indices using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in San Francisco, 7-11 April. Schulz, W. (2008). Questionnaire construct validation in the international civic and citizenship education study. Paper presented to the 3rd IEA International Research Conference in Taipei, September. Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., Dural, S., & Can, S. (2009). Structural equivalence modelling of measurement equivalence and analysis within the scope of item reply theory, Turkish Psychology journal, 64, 61-75
• Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar [Constructional equality models: Basic concepts and model practices]. Turkish Psychology Articles, 6, 49-74.
• Şekercioğlu, G. (2010). Çocuklar İçin Benlik Algısı Profilinin Uyarlanması ve Faktör Yapısının Farklı Değişkenlere Göre Eşitliğinin Test Edilmesi (Adaptation of self–perception profile for children and testing factor structure equation according to different variables), Unpublished doctorate thesis, Ankara University, faculty of education sciences, Ankara. Tabachnick B.G., & Fidell I.S.(2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, fourth edition, Boston: Ally and Bacon Timm, N.H. (2002). Applied multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Springer. Uzun, B., & Öğretmen, T. (2010). Fen Başarısı ile İlgili Bazi Değişkenlerin TIMMS-R Türkiye Örnekleminde Cinsiyete Göre Ölçme Değişmezliğinin Değerlendirilmesi (Assessing the measurement invariance of factors that are related to students’ science achievement across gender in TIMMS-R turkey sample). Eğitim ve Bilim, 155, 26-35.
• Yıldırım, H. H. (2006). The differential item functioning (dif) analysis of mathematics items in the international assessment programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.