A comparison of Turkish and german mathematics Teachers’ Values: A gender perspective

Bu çalışma, “Türkiye ve Almanya’da Matematik Öğretiminde Değerler" adlı projeden elde edilen verilere dayanmaktadır ve matematik öğretmenlerinin değerlerinin üzerinde cinsiyetin ve milliyetin etkisinin olup olmadığını incelemiştir. Çalışma, nicel yönteme dayalı betimsel bir çalışmadır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları, 33 Türk ve 27 Alman matematik öğretmenidir. Analizler, betimsel ve yordayıcı istatistikleri içermektedir. Etki büyüklüğü değerleri de hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, (1) cinsiyet ve milliyet grupları arasındaki etkileşim etkisinin anlamlı olmadığını; (2) cinsiyet için temel etkinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığını ve (3) milliyet için temel etkinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Türk ve Alman matematik öğretmenlerinin değerlerinin karşılaştırılması: Cinsiyet perspektifi

This research was based on the data obtained from “Values in Mathematics Teaching in Turkey and Germany” [VMTG] project and it has examined whether gender and nationality influence values of mathematics teachers. The methodology used in this research was a descriptive quantitative method. The participants of the study were twenty-seven German and thirty-three Turkish mathematics teachers. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics. Effect sizes were also calculated. The findings revealed that: (1) the interaction effect between nationality and gender group was not statistically significant; (2) the main effect for gender did not reach statistical significance; and (3) there was a statistically significant main effect for nationality.

___

  • Atweh, B., &Seah, W. T. (2008, February).Theorizing values and their study in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, Australia.
  • Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Bishop, A. J. (1996, June). How Should Mathematics Teaching in Modern Societies Relate to Cultural Values-Some Preliminary Questions. Paper presented at the Seventh Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Bishop, A. J. (1998).Culture, values and assessment in mathematics. In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education, 1, 27- 37. Seoul: Korea Society of Mathematical Education.
  • Bishop, A. J. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 346 -349.
  • Bishop, A. J. (2004, July). Critical issues in researching cultural aspects of mathematics education. Paper presented in Discussion Group 2 at the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4-11.
  • Bishop, A. J. & Whitfield, R. C. (1972).Situations in teaching. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.
  • Bishop, A., Clarkson, P., FitzSimons, G.& Seah, W.T. (2000). Why Study Values in Mathematics Teaching: Contextualising the VAMP Project. http://www.education.monash.edu.au/projects/vamp/. Accessed 24 January 2004.
  • Bishop, A.J., Clarkson, P.C., FitzSimons, G.E., & Seah, W.T. (2002) Studying values in mathematics education: aspects of the VAMP project. Proceedings of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia conference, Waikato, New Zealand.
  • Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill R. G., Jones, D. & Agard P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194 - 222.
  • Butty, J.A. (2001). Teacher instruction, student attitudes, and mathematics. performance among 10.th. and 12.th. grade black and Hispanic students. The Journal of Negro Education, 70, 19 -37.
  • Chin, C.& Lin, F. L. (2001).Value-loaded activities in mathematics classroom. Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, pp. 249-256. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Chin, C. (2006). Conceptualising pedagogical values and identities in teacher development: A comparison of Taiwanese and Australian mathematics teachers. In Frederick K.S. Leung, Klaus-D.
  • Graf, & Francis J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West (pp. 537-547), New York: Springer.
  • Clarkson, P. C. (2007). The development of research into values in mathematics education. In G. Leder & H. Forgasz (eds.), Stepping stones for the 21st century (p. 223). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum.
  • Correa, C., M. Perry, L. Sims, K. Miller, and G. Fang. (2008). Connected and Culturally Embedded Beliefs: Chinese and US Teachers Talk About How Their Students Best Learn Mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 140-153.
  • Davis, B., Ernest, P., Gamoran, A., Gerdes, P., & Sharygin, G. (2004, July). The thematic afternoon on perspectives on research in mathematics from other disciplines, 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-10) Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dede, Y. (2006). Mathematics educational values of college students towards function concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 82 -102.
  • Dede Y. (2009). Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Values: Positivist And Constructivist Values. Scientific Research and Essays. 4, 1229 -1235.
  • Dede Y.(2011). Mathematics Education Values Questionnaire for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: Design, Validation, and Results. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 603- 626.
  • Dede Y. (2012). Why is Mathematics Valuable? A Comparison of Turkish and German Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Education Bulletin- BOLEMA, 26, 1171- 1206.
  • Demirhan, İ. C., & Senemoglu, N. (2009). Effectiveness of values education curriculum for fourth grades. Education and Science, 34(153).
  • Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects. Fourth Edition. Mc Graw Hill, Glasgow: Open University Press.
  • Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2006, July). A scale for mathematics and mathematical values of pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (ICTM 3), Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Dursun, Ş., & Dede, Y. (2004). Öğrencilerin Matematikte Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörler: Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri Bakımından. Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 217- 230.
  • Education Research and Development Directorate (EARGED). (2005). PISA 2003 project, national report. Ankara. Turkey: National Education Press.
  • Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. London: Falmer Press.
  • Ernest, P. (1995). Values, Gender and Images of Mathematics: A Philosophical Perspective, International Journal for Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 26(3), 449-462.
  • Ernest, P. (1998). Images of mathematics, values, and gender: A philosophical perspective. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education (pp. 45- 58). Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2: 249-256.
  • Ernest, P. (2004). What is the Philosophy of Mathematics Education?. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 18, http://www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/pome18/contents.htm.
  • Ernest, P. (2007). The Philosophy of Mathematics, Values and Keralese Mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 4 (2), 174 -187.
  • Ernest, P. (2008). Epistemology Plus Values Equals Classroom Image of Mathematics. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 23. (pp.12).
  • Fasheh, M.(1982).Mathematics, Culture, and Authority. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 2-8.
  • Field, A. (2002). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage Publications Ltd., UK: London.
  • FitzSimons, G. E., Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Clarkson, P. C. (2001). Values portrayed by mathematics teachers. In C. Vale & J.Horwood & J. Roumeliotis (Eds.), A mathematical odyssey (pp. 403-410). Melbourne, Australia: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.
  • FitzSimons, G., Seah, W.T., Bishop, A.J.& Clarkson, P. (2000). Conceptions of values and mathematics education held by Australian primary teachers’: Preliminary findings from VAMP. In W.S. Horng, & F.L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 International Conference on History in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 163-171). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
  • FitzSimons, G.; Seah, W., Bishop, A.J. & Clarkson, P. (2001, July). Beyond Numeracy: Values in the Mathematics Classroom. 24th Annual MERGA Conference, Sydney, Australia.
  • Frade, C.& Machado, M.C (2008, July). Culture and Affect: Influences of the Teachers’ Values on Students’ Affect. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME‐NA XXX, Vol. 3, pp. 33-40, Morelia, Mexico.
  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An Introduction (6 th Ed.). New York: Longman Publishers.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice : psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pres.
  • Gravetter, F.J. & Forzano, L.B. (2008). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cengage.
  • Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 19 (1), 3-45. gegenüber Mathematik bei
  • Gudmunsdottir, S. (1991). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 44 -52 .
  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324.
  • Inglehart. M. R., & Brown. D. R. (1987). Gender differences in values and their impact on academic achievement. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 287 134).
  • James, A.N. (2007). Gender differences and the teaching of mathematics. Inquiry, 12(1), 14-25.
  • Kaiser, G. (2006). The mathematical beliefs of teachers about applications and modelling-results of an empirical study. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Hrsg.). Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), Vol. 3 (pp. 393- 400). Prague: Charles University.
  • Lancaster, D. L. (2006). Values in Mathematics. http://www.curriculum.edu.au /verve/_resources/ LeighLancaster_ Values_ mathematics.pdf.. Accessed 23 August 2008.
  • Leder, G. C. & Forgasz, H. J (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.) Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics educations? (pp.95-113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Taylor, P. J. (2006). Mathematics, gender, and large scale data: New directions or more of the same? In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 33-40). Prague: PME.
  • Leedy, M. G., LaLonde, D. & Runk, K. (2003). Gender Equity in Mathematics: Beliefs of Students, Parents and Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 103(6), 285-292.
  • Leu, Y. C., & Wu, C. J. (2000). An elementary teacher's pedagogical values in mathematics: Clarification and change. In W. S. Horng & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 Conference: History in Mathematics Education: Challenges for a New Millennium (vol. 2, pp. 178–195). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
  • Levin, S.L., Mohamed, F.B. & Platek, S.M. (2005). Common ground for spatial cognition? A behavioral and fMRI study of sex differences in mental rotation and spatial working memory. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 227-254.
  • Lim, C. S. & Ernest, P. (1998, February). A survey of public images of mathematics. Paper presented at British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip18- 12/index.html. Accessed 3 January 2011
  • Lim, C. S. (2003).Cultural differences and mathematics learning in Malaysia. The Mathematics Educator 7(1), 110-122.
  • Lin, F.C., Wang, C.-Y., Chin, C., & Chang, G.-Y. (2006).Why student teachers teach or do not teach the professed values? In Novotna, J., Moraova, H., Kratka, M., & Stehlikova, N. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 30), vol. 4 (pp.81-88), Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
  • Maass, K. (2009). What are Teacher's Beliefs about Effective Mathematics Teaching? A Qualitative Study of Secondary School Teachers in Germany. In Cai, J, Kaiser, G; Perry, B, &Wong, N.Y. (eds.). Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives. National and cross-national studies. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Misek, M. (2007). Germany’s Educational Tracking System and How It Affects Entrepreneurship. Neurus paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://www-sre.wu- wien.ac.at/neurus/Misek07.pdf. Accessed 23 December 2010.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Ocean, J. (2005).Who Cares?:Students’ values and the mathematics curriculum. Curriculum Matters,1, 130-151.
  • Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2001). Legal perspectives on values, culture and education: human rights, responsibilities and values in education, in: J.Cairns, D.Lawton and R.Gardner (eds), Values, Culture and Education (pp. 85-103), London, Kogan Page.
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual , New York: Open University Press.
  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Powe, K. W. (1993). Values education and the local school board. Updating School Board Policies, 24(6), 1-4.
  • Rahmenlehrplan für die Gymnasiale Oberstufe [RGO]. (2006). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. Germany.
  • Rahmenlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe 1 (RSS) (2006). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. Germany.
  • Rahmenplan Grundschule Mathematik (RGM).(2004). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. Germany.
  • Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from values and teaching. In: P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 98-214). Malabar: Krieger.
  • Riley, R. W., McGuire, C. K., Conaty, J.C.& Dorfman, C.H. (1999). The Educational System in Germany: Case Study Findings. National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment Office of Educational Research and Improvement. U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Education. Washington D.C.
  • Scantlebury, K. (2009).Gender bias in teaching.In E. Anderman (Ed.). Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia. (pp. 221-224).Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
  • Schumann, H. (2000, June). The German Educational System and Math Curriculum. Hong Kong Mathematics Education Conference - 02. Chinese University of Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the Hong Kong Mathematics Education Conference.Hong Kong Association for Mathematics Education.
  • Seah, W. T. (2002). Exploring Teacher Clarification of Values Relating to Mathematics Education. In C. Vale & J. Roumeliotis & J. Horwood (Eds.),Valuing Mathematics in Society, 93- 104. Brunswick, Australia: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
  • Seah, W. T. (2003, December.). The Professional Socialisation of Teachers in Transition: A Values Perspective. International Education Research Conference AARE- NZARE, Auckland, N.Zealand.
  • Seah, W. T. (2007). Qualities co-valued in effective mathematics lessons in Australia: Preliminary findings. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 161-168). Seoul, South Korea.
  • Seah, W. T. (2008).Valuing values in mathematics education. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education: Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 239–252). New York: Springer.
  • Seah, W. T.& Bishop, A. J. (1999). Realizing a mathematics education for nation-building in Southeast Asia in the new millennium [CD-ROM]. In S. P. Loo (Ed.), proceedings of the MERA-ERA Joint Conference (vol. 3, pp. 1241 -1249). Malaysia and Singapore: Malaysian Educational Research Association and Educational Research Association Singapore.
  • Seah, W. T., & Bishop, A. J. (2002). Values, mathematics and society: Making the connections. In C. Vale, J. Roumeliotis & J. Horwood (Eds.), Valuing mathematics in society (pp. 105-113). Brunswick, Australia: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
  • Seah, W.T. & Peng, A. (2012). What students outside Asia value in effective mathematics lessons: a scoping study ZDM Mathematics Education 44: 71-82.
  • Stake, R. E.(1995). The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Stigler, J. W., & Perry, M. (1988). Cross cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: Recent findings and new directions. In D. A. Grouws, T. J. Cooney, & D. Jones (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 104-223). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Swadener, M. & R. Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, Mathematics Education and the Task of Developing Pupils’ Personalities: An Indonesian Perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics,19 (2),193 -208.
  • Tocci, C. M. & Engelhard, Jr., G. (1991). Achievement, parental support, and gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 280-286.
  • Törner, G. (1997, October). Views of German Mathematics Teachers on Mathematics. In Dossey, J. A.; Swafford, J. O. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education at Illinois University Bloomington / Normal (Vol. I, pp. 275 - 281). Columbus (OH): ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
  • Turkish Ministry of National Education [MEB]. (2005). High school mathematics curriculum, Grade 9- 12. Ankara: National Education Press.
  • Turkish Ministry of National Education [MEB]. (2009a). Primary school mathematics curriculum and guide, Grade 6-8. Ankara: National Education Press.
  • Turkish Ministry of National Education [MEB].(2009b). Primary school mathematics curriculum, Grade 1-5. Ankara: National Education Press.
  • Vale, C. (2008, July). Trends and factors concerning gender and mathematics in Australasia. The International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME) 11, TSG32: Gender and mathematics. Monterrey, Mexico.
  • Walshaw, M. (2010). Mathematics pedagogical change: rethinking identity and reflective practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(6), 487-497.
  • Wang, C.-Y., Lin, F.-C., Chin, C., & Chang, G.-Y. Re-examining the category framework for describing mathematics teachers' values. Paper presented at the Taiwan 2006 Annual Conference of Educational Research, Hwa-Lien: National Hwa-Lien University of Education.
  • Wong, N.Y.& Wong, W.Y.,& Yu Wong, E. W. (2012). What do the Chinese value in (mathematics) education? ZDM Mathematics Education, 44: 9-19.
  • Yero, J. L. (2002). Teaching in mind: How teacher thinking shapes education. Hamilton.
  • Yin, R.K.(2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd.
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi