Developing an effective lifelong learning scale (ELLS): Study of validity & reliability

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkçe dilinde “Etkili Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Ölçeği (EYBÖÖ)” geliştirmektir. EYBÖÖ’nün 48 maddelik ilk formu 742 (528 birey AFA için ve 214 birey DFA için) öğretmen adayına uygulanmıştır. Madde analizi için, madde yükleri, madde-toplam korelasyonları ve alt-üst grup ortalamaları farkları birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Tek faktörlü 33 maddelik ölçme aracı elde edilmiştir. Tek faktörlü yapının açıklanan varyansı %41.68’dir. Uyum indeksleri (2/sd: 3.39; RMSEA: .057; GFI: .84; AGFI: .82; RMR: .033; SRMR: .044; NFI; .97; NNFI: .98; CFI: .98) değerlendirilmiş ve modelin iyi bir uyuma sahip olduğu doğrulanmıştır. Cronbach alfa (α) iç tutarlılık katsayısı .96 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu ölçek, bireyin yaşam boyu öğrenmedeki başarısını ve bireyde etkili bir yaşam boyu öğrenmeyi gerçekleştirmeyi sağlayacak özelliklerin bulunma düzeyini değerlendirmek için yardımcı bir araçtır.

Etkili yaşam boyu öğrenme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik & güvenirlik çalışması

The purpose of the present study was to develop an “Effective Lifelong Learning Scale (ELLS)” in Turkish language. The 48-item initial version of the ELLS was applied to a total of 742 (528 for EFA and 214 for CFA) student teachers. For item analysis, the results of the item loadings, the item analysis based on the correlations and the item analysis based on the difference between the upper and lower group means were evaluated together. The single-factor construct and the 33 items were obtained. The percentage of the variance that the single-factor construct was able to explain was 41.68%. The fit indices obtained (2/df: 3.39; RMSEA: .057; GFI: .84; AGFI: .82; RMR: .033; SRMR: .044; NFI; .97; NNFI: .98; CFI: .98) were evaluated, and the construct was confirmed to have a good fit. The Cronbach’s alpha (α) internal consistency coefficient was computed to be .96. This scale is a supplementary tool for the evaluation of individuals’ success in lifelong learning as well as their level of characteristics that will lead to effective lifelong learning.

___

  • Adams, D.N. (2007). Lifelong learning skills and attributes: The perceptions of Australian secondary school teachers, Issues in Educational Research, 17, 1-12.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Bryce, J. (2006). Schools and lifelong learners. In J. Chapman, P. Cartwright & E.J. McGilp (Eds.), Lifelong learning, participation and equity (pp. 243-263). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (12. baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Candy, P.C., Crebert, G. and O'Leary, J. (1994). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education (Commissioned Report No. 28). Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training.
  • Comrey, A. L., and Lee, H. B. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  • Costello, A. B., and Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
  • Coşkun, Y. D. and Demirel, M. (2010). Lifelong learning tendency scale: the study of validity and reliability. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2343-2350.
  • Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the ELLI Project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247-272.
  • Cropley, A.J. and Dave, R.H. (1978). Lifelong education and the training of teachers. Pergamon, Oxford.
  • Crow, S. R. (2006). What motivates a lifelong earner?. School Libraries Worldwide, 12(1), 22-34.
  • De La Harpe, B. and Radloff, A. (2000). Informed teachers and learners: The importance of assessing the characteristics needed for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 169-182.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 26, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Dinevski, D. and Dinevski, I. V. (2004). The concepts of university lifelong learning provision in Europe. Transition Studies Review, 11(3), 227-235.
  • Dowling, D., Dowling, S., Dowling, C., Fisser, P., Grabowska, A., Hezemans, M., Kendall, M. and et al. (2004). Lifelong Learning in the Digital Age (Focus Group Report). IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 137, 1-49.
  • Dunn, E. (2003). Life through learning; Learning through life, the lifelong learning strategy for Scotland: Summary (p. 3). The Scottish Government, Retrieved 2013 July 20, from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/47032/0028820.pdf.
  • ELLI. (2010). Making Lifelong Learning Tangible!. The European ELLI Index 2010, Retrieved 2011 May 05 from http://www.elli.org/fileadmin/user_upload/About_ELLI/Documents/ELLI_EU_eng_final.pdf
  • European Commission. (2002). European report on quality indicators of lifelong learning. Fifteen quality indicators. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture, brussels, june 2002.
  • European Parliament. (2006). Recommendation Of The European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. 15.04.2011 tarihinde http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF sitesinden elde edilmiştir.
  • Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics Using SPSS (2nd Edition). London: Sage.
  • Fives, H. and Buehl, M. M. (2010). Examining the factor structure of the teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 118–134.
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 532-560.
  • Goeller, W. (2008). The relationships between optimism, hope and lifelong learning in Older Adults.
  • Unpublished Master Thesis, California State University, Long Beach.
  • Gunuc, S., Odabasi, H. F. and Kuzu, A. (2012). Yaşam Boyu Öğrenmeyi Etkileyen Faktörler. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 309-325.
  • Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., and Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality and over determination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202-226.
  • Holmes, A. (2002). Lifelong learning. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteris versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Hutcheson, G. and Sofroniou, N. (1999). The Multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Jarman, R., Mcaleese, L. and Mcconnell, B. (1997). Science and lifelong learning: A survey of science teachers' provision for the promotion of pupils' independent study at Key Stage 4, Evaluation & Research in Education, 11(3), 149-163.
  • Johanson, G. A. and Brooks, G. P. (2009). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400.
  • Jovanova-Mitkovska, S. and Hristovska, D. (2011). Contemporary teacher and core competences for lifelong learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 573-578.
  • Kirby, J. R., Knapper, C., Lamon, P. and Egnatoff, W. J. (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 291-302.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural aquation modeling (2nd. edition). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Knapper, C. and Cropley, A.J. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education (3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
  • Kulich, J. (1982) Lifelong education and the universities: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(2), 123–142.
  • Livneh, C.L. (1988). Characteristics of lifelong learners in the human service professions. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(3), 149-159.
  • Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Love, D. (2011). Lifelong learning: Characteristics, skills, and activities for a business college curriculum. Journal of Education For Business, 86, 155-162.
  • Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110.
  • Merriam, S., Caffarella, R. and Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in Adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.
  • Nordstrom, N. M. and Merz, J. F. (2006). Learning later, living greater; the secret for making the most of your after-50 years. Colorado; USA, Sent ient Boulder CO Publishing.
  • OECD. (2000). Motivating Students for Lifelong Learning. What Works in Innovation in Education Series, OECD, Paris.
  • Parkinson, A. (1999). Developing the attribute of lifelong learning. 29 th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 10-13, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  • Saisana, M. and Cartwright, F. (2007). Measuring lifelong learning and its impact on happiness: The Canadian paradigm. International Conference on Policies for Happiness, June 14-17, Siena.
  • Scales, P. (2008). Teaching in the lifelong learning sector. Buckingham, GBR: Open University Press.
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation models: Basic principles and sample applications]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 3(6), 49– 74.
  • Steward, A. (2009). Continuing your professional development in lifelong learning. London, GBR: Continuum International Publishing.
  • Su, Y-H., Feng, L-Y., Yang, C-C. and Chen, T-L. (2012). How teachers support university students’ lifelong learning development for sustainable futures: The student’s perspective. Futures, 44, 158-165.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tan, C. L. and Morris, J. S. (2006). Undergraduate college students, laptop computers, and lifelong learning. The Journal of General Education, 54(4), 316-338.
  • Tezbaşaran, A.A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
  • Thompson, B. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications (Third edition). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Worthington, R. L. and Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838.
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi