Burcu OĞLAKÇI, Nur BALCI, Zümrüt Ceren ÖZDUMAN, Evrim Eligüzeloğlu DALKILIÇ

Profilaktik Polisaj Protokollerinin Farklı Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi

Giriş ve Amaç: Profilaktik polisaj protokollerinin farklı rezin kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Üç farklı rezin kompozit kullanılmıştır: nanohibrit(Charisma Topaz-CT), yüksek visköziteli bulk-fill(Filtek Bulk FillFB) ve düşük visköziteli bulk-fill(Metafil Bulk Fill-MB). Toplam 120 adet disk şeklinde örnek(çap: 4mm,kalınlık: 2mm) hazırlanmış ve LED ışık cihazı ile 20 s boyunca polimerize edilmiştir(1000 mW/cm2 ). Polisaj işlemleri, alüminyum oksit diskler(OptiDisc) ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve farklı profilaktik polisaj protokollerine göre rastgele 4 alt gruba ayrılmıştır(n=10): 1)kontrol(profilaktik polisaj protokolü yok), 2)polisaj patı, 3)air-polishing, 4)air-polishing+polisaj patı. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü(Ra,μm), kontakt profilometre(Marsurf M 300C) ile ölçülmüştür. Veriler, iki yönlü ANOVA ve Bonferroni testleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir(p

The Effect of Prophylactic Polishing Protocols on Surface Roughness of Different Resin Composites

Introduction: Evaluation the effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of different resin composites. Methods: Three different resin composites were used: nanohybrid(Charisma Topaz-CT), high-viscosity bulk-fill(Filtek Bulk Fill-FB) and low-viscosity bulk-fill(Metafil Bulk Fill-MB)(N=40). Totally 120 disc-shaped specimens(diameter: 4mm,thickness: 2mm) were fabricated and polymerized with LED light-curing device for 20s(1000 mW/cm2 ). The polishing procedures were performed with aluminum oxide discs (OptiDisc) and randomly subdivided into four groups according to different prophylactic polishing protocols(n=10): 1)control(no prophylactic polishing protocol), 2)polishing paste, 3)air-polishing, 4)air-polishing+polishing paste. The surface roughness(Ra,μm) were measured by a contact profilometry(Marsurf M 300C). Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests(p

PDF

___

1. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, 12th Ed., Mosby, St. Louis, 2006,189−212.
2. Oglakci B, Kucukyildirim BO, Özduman ZC, Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E. The effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nanocomposites: contact profilometry and sem analyses. Oper Dent. 2021;46:173-187. 10.2341/20- 157-L
3. Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. Oper Dent. 2015;40:172-80.
4. Vandewalker JP, Casey JA, Lincoln TA, et al. Properties of dual-cure, bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials. Gen Dent. 2016; 64:68-73.
5. Patil SS, Rakhewar PS, Limaye PS, et al. A comparative evaluation of plaque-removing efficacy of air polishing and rubbercup, bristle brush with paste polishing on oral hygiene status: A clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015; 5: 457- 462.
6. Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Oskoee PA, et al. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on microleakage of microfilled composite restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2012; 6: 65-9
7. Graumann SJ, Sensat ML, Stoltenberg J. Air polishing: a review of current literature. J Dent Hyg. 2013; 87:173–80.
8. Yap AUJ, Wu SS, Chelvan S, et al. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 99-104.
9. Neme AL, Wagner WC, Pink FE,et al. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of resin composite materials in vitro. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 808-15.
10. St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crepeau H, et al. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper Dent. 2019; 44: E122-E132
11. Yamanel K. Farklı profilaktik parlatma işlemlerinin mikrohibrit ve nanohibrit kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2018; 21:85-92.
12. Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Drozdzik Agnieszka, Tandecka K, et al. Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material - comparison of three different air-polishing powders BMC Oral Health 2020; 20:30.
13. HM, Taher NM. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2014); 112: 625–631.
14. Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 379-397.
15. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 534-543.
16. Janus J, Fauxpointa G, Arntzc Y, et al. Surface roughness and morphology of three nano- composites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach Dent Mater. 2014; 26: 416- 425.
17. Aytac F, Karaarslan E, Agaccioglu M, et al. Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28: 247-261.
18. Sugiyama T, Kameyama A, Enokuchi T, et al. Effect of professional dental prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e772-8.
19. Sawai MA, Bhardwaj A, Jafri Z, et al. Tooth polishing: The current status. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015; 19: 375–380.
20. Güler AU, Duran İ, Yücel AÇ, et al. Effects of air polishing powders on the surface roughness of composite resins, J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19: 505-510.
21. Giacomelli L, Salerno M, Derchi G, et al. Effect of air polishing with glycine and bicarbonate powders on a nanocomposite used in dental restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Period Rest Dent. 2011;31:e51–6.
22. Warren DP, Colescott TD, Henson HA, et al. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; 14: 245-251.
23. Carr MP, Mitchell JC, Seghi RR, et al. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials. Gen Dent 2002; 50: 238-241.
24. Toz Akalın T, Demir B, Öztürk Bozkurt F, et al. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols and mouthrinses on the surface roughness of different adhesive restorative materials. 7tepe Klinik 2016 12:17-24.
25.Bayne SC, Taylor DF. Dental materials. In: Sturdevant CM, ed. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 3rd Ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 1995, 206−87