Deniz ÖZZEYBEK, Sermin ÖZTEKİN, Aydın TAŞDÖĞEN, Ömür MAVİOĞLU, Zahide ELAR

Kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon: Tıp öğrencilerinin eğitimi

Amaç: Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Stajı kapsamında Fakültemiz Dönem V öğrencilerine uygulanan Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)] kursunun etkinliğinin değerlendirmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Eylül 1998/Haziran 1999 tarihleri arasında staj yapan ve 5-6 kişilik gruplara ayrılan toplam 165 öğrenciye 5 gün süreyle "International Liaison Commitee On Resuscitation" (ILCOR) önerilerine göre hazırlanmış bir CPR eğitim programı uygulandı. Stajın birinci gününde gerçekleştirilen "Yazılı Değerlendirme" ve "Manken Üzerinde Beceri Testi"nin ardından kursa teorik sunum, video gösterisi ve manken üzerinde uygulama ile devam edildi. Kurs sonrasında "Yazılı Değerlendirme" ve "Manken Üzerinde Beceri Testi" yinelendi. Bulgular: Kurs öncesinde 100 üzerinden 6,6$\pm$5,7 olan "Yazık Değerlendirme" ile 31,9$\pm$14,6 olan "Manken Üzerinde Beceri Testi" sonuçlarının kurs sonrasında sırasıyla 53,8±11,2 (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Anestezi bölümü, hastane, Eğitim, Öğrenciler, tıp, Kardiyopulmoner canlandırma

Training of medical students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Objective: To analyse the effectiveness of a resuscitation training course done by fifth year medical students during their allocation to the Department of Anaesthesia. Methods: A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) training program was applied to 165 medical students divided into subgroups, each containing 5-6 persons, for five days according to the advisory statements of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), between September 1998-June 1999. On the first day of anaesthesia training, a written exam and a skill test were carried out, then the course continued with a lecture, video show and training on the mannequin. The written exam and skill test were repeated at the end of the course. Results: The results of pre and post-training scores were compared according to their success evaluated out of a total of 100 points. The results before starting the course showed that the average point of the students was 6.6 ± 5.7 for the written exam and 31.9 ± 14.6 for the skill test. After they were involved in the CPR training program, these points increased to 53.8 ±11.2 (p<0.01) and 95.2 ± 4.7 (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the traditional program of CPR must be supported by intensive practice on the mannequin and must be adapted according to recent concepts.

Keywords:

Anesthesia Department, Hospital, Education, Students, Medical, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation,

___

1. Garcia-Barbero M, Caturla-Such J. What are we doing in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in Europe? An analysis of a survey. Resuscitation 1999;41:225-236.
2. Assar D, Chamberlain D, Colquhoun M, et al. A rationale for staged teaching of basic life support. Resuscitation 1998;39:137-143.
3. Bulut S, Aengevaeren WRM, Luijten HJE, et al. Successful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resusci¬ tation: what is the optimal in-hospital treatment strategy? Resuscitation 2000;47:155-161.
4. Lester CA, Morgan CL, Donnelly PD, et al. Assessing with CARE: an innovative method of testing the approach and casualty assessment components of basic life support, using video recording. Resuscitation 1997; 34:43-49.
5. Donnelly PD, Lester CA, Morgan CL1, et al. Evaluating CPR performance in basic life support: the VIDRAP protocol. Resuscitation 1998;36:51-57.
6. Perkins GD, Hulme J, Tweed MJ. Variability in the assessment of advanced life support skills. Resus¬ citation 2001 ;50:281 -286.
7. Stare B, Pecan M. Training of medical students in resuscitation at die University of Ljubljana. Resus¬ citation 1996;32:19-22.
8. Kaye W, Mancini ME. Teaching adult resuscitation in the United States-time for a rethink. Resuscitation 1998;37:177-187.
9. Buchman TG, Dellinger RP, Raphaely RC, et al. Undergraduate education in critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 1992;20:l595-1603.
10. Todd KH, Braslow A, Brennan RT, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of Video self-instruction versus traditional CPR training. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:364- 369. 11. Brennan RT, Braslow A, Batcheller AM, et al. A reliable method for evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation training outcomes. Resuscitation 1996;85:85-93.
12. Christensen UJ, Heffernan D, Andersen SF, et al. ResusSim 98-a PC advanced life support trainer. Resuscitation 1998;39:81-84.
13. Braslow A, Brennan RT, Newman MM, et al. CPR training without an instructor: development and evaluation of a video self-instructional system for effective performance of cardiopulmonary resus¬ citation. Resuscitation 1997;34:207-220.
14. Bell JH, Harrison DA, Carr B. Resuscitation skills of trainee anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 1995;50:692-694.
15. Perkins GD, Hulme J, Bion JF. Peer-led resuscitation training for health care students: a randomised controlled study. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:698-700.
16. Noordergraaf GJ, Be WK, Sabbe M, et al. Training needs and qualifications af anaesthesiologists not exposed to ALS. Resuscitation 1999;40:147-160.
17. McGowan J, Graham CA, Gordon MWG. Appointment of a Resuscitation Training Officer is associated with improved survival from in-hospital ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 1999;41:169-173.
18. Leah V, Whitbread M, Coats TJ. Resuscitation training for medical students. Resuscitation 1998;39:87-90.
19. Jansen JJM, Berden HJJM, van der Vleuten CPM, et al. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of general practitioners using different scoring methods. Resuscitation 1997;34:35-41.
20. Nyman J, Sihvonen M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in nurses and nursing students. Resuscitation 2000;47:179-184.
21. Royal College of Physicians. Resuscitation from cardiopulmonary arrest: organisation and training. J R Col Phys Lond 1987;21:176-182. (Perkins GD, Hulme J, Shore HR, Bion JF. Basic life support training for health care students. Resuscitation 1999;41:19-23.)