A Reiview and Assessment of Theories of the Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Foreign Direct Investment $(FDI)^+$

Uluslararası İşletmecilik alanının Uluslararası İktisat disiplininden ayrılmasından bu yana işletmecilikle ilgili diğer disiplinlerden de yararlanılarak Uluslararası İşletmecilik ile ilgili çeşitli teorik perspektifler geliştirilmiştir. Bu makalede incelenen Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlarla ilgili teoriler şunlardır: Piyasa Eksikliği (Yetersizliği) ve Oligopolistik Tepki Teorileri, Ürün Döngüsü (Product Cycle) Teorisi, İçselleştirme (Internalization) Teorisi, Eklemlemeli (Eclectic) Teori, Safhalar (Uppsala) Teorisi, Şebeke (Network) Teorisi. Bu teorilerin kökenleri ve temel argümanları ortaya konulmakla kalmayıp, bir dereceye kadar, Uluslararası İşletmecilik fenomenini açıklamaktaki güçlü ve zayıf oldukları yönlere de değinilmiştir.

Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Teorileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme ve Değerlendirme

Since the departure of the field of International Business (IB) from international economics orientation various theoretical perspectives of IB was built by taking into account other business related disciplines. In this article, we have concentrated on main theories of FDI and MNCs, namely, market imperfection and oligopolistic reaction theories, product cycle theory (PCT), internalization theory (IT), eclectic (OLI) theory, incremental (Uppsala) theory (UT), and network theory (NT). Not only we have presented origins and main arguments of these theories but also we have, to some extend, evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of them.

___

  • Aharoni, Yair (1999). The Foreign Investment Decision Process (in Abridged Form). In Peter J. Buckley and Pervez N. Ghauri (Ed.), The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader (pp. 3-13). Second Edition, London: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Aliber, R. Z. (1970). A Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. In C. P. Kindleberger (Ed.) The International Corporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. American Heritage Dictionary (1995). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Andersson, Ulf & Johanson, Jan (1997). International Business Enterprise. In Ingmar Björkman and Mats Forsgren (Ed.) The Nature of International Firm: Nordic Contributions to International Business Research.
  • Bain, Joe S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge: MA. Harvard University Press.
  • Barkema, Harry G., Bell, John H. & Pennings, Johannes M. (1996). Foreign Entry, Cultural Barriers, and Learning. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 17, 151- 166.
  • Boddewyn, Jean J. (1985). Theories of Foreign Direct Investment and Divestment: A Classificatory Note. Management International Review, vol. 25, 57-65.
  • Bodur, Muzaffer, and Madsen, T. K. (1993). Danish Foreign Direct Investments in Turkey. European Business Review. 93 (5), pp. 28-43.
  • Brook, M. Z. & Remmers, H. L. (1977). International Management and Business Policy. Boston: Houghton Miffin Company.
  • Brouthers, Keith D. (2002). Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies.Second Quarter, 33 (2), 203-221.
  • Buckley, Peter J. (1988). The Limits of Explanation: Testing the Internalization Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies.Summer, 181-194.
  • Buckley, Peter J. (1997). Trends in International Business Research: The Next 25 Years, In Iyanatul Islam and William Shepherd (Ed.), Current Issues in International Business. London: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (1976). The Future of Multinational Enterprises.London: McMillian.
  • Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (1998). Analyzing Foreign Entry Strategies:Extending the Internalization Approach. Journal of International Business Studies. 29 (3), 539-562.
  • Buckley, Peter J., & Casson, Mark (2003). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise in Retrospect and in Prospect. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (2),219-222.
  • Calvet, A. L. (1981). A Synthesis of Foreign Direct Investment Theories and Theories of the Multinational Firm. Journal of International Business Studies. 12(1), 43-59.
  • Casson, Mark (1992). Internalization Theory and Beyond. In Buckley, P.J. (Ed.), International Business: Research Priorities for the 1990s ( pp.4-27).
  • Caves, Richard E. (1971). International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment. Economica. 38,1-27.
  • Caves, Richard E. (1982). Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caves, Richard E. (1996). Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chen, Homin, & Chen, Tain-Jy (1998). Network Linkages and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies. Third Quarter, 29 (3), 445-468.
  • Clark, Timothy, Pugh, Derek S., & Mallory, Geoff (1997). The Process of Internationalization in the Operating Firm. International Business Review. 6 (6), 605-623.
  • Coase, R. A. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, November, 386-405.
  • Coviello, Nichole E., & McAuley, Andrew (1999). Internationalization and the Smaller Firm: A Review of Contemporary Empirical Research. Management International Review, 39 (3), 223-256.
  • Cyert R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Czinkota, Michael R., Ronkainen, Ikka A., & Moffett, Michael H. (1996). International Business. Fourth Edition, NY: The Dryden Press.
  • Çavuşgil, T. S. (1993). Differences Among Exporting Firms Based on Degrees of Internationalization. In Buckley, Peter J., & Ghauri, Pervez N. (Ed.), The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader. San Diego: Academic Press,
  • Doz, Yvez (1986). Strategic Management in Multinational Companies. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
  • Dunning, John H. (1980). Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies. 11 (1), 9-30.
  • Dunning, John H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies. 191-31.
  • Dunning, John H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and Global Economy. New York: Addison-Westley.
  • Dunning, John H. (1995a) Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism. Journal of International Business. Third Quarter,461-491.
  • Dunning, John H. (1995b). Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: A Search for an Eclectic Approach. In Buckley, Peter J., & Ghauri, Pervez N. (Ed.), The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader (pp.61-79).Second Edition, London: International Thomson Business Press, 1999,
  • Dunning, John H. (1999). Forty Years on: American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry Revisited. Transnational Corporations, 8 (2), 1-33.
  • Dunning, John H. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity. International Business Review, 9, 163-190.
  • Dunning, John H. (2002). "Perspectives on International Business Research: A Professional Autobiography Fifty Years Researching and Teaching International Business. Journal of International Business. 33 (4), 817-835.
  • Dunning, John H. (2003). Some Antecedents of Internalization Theory. Journal of International Business. 34 (2), 108-115.
  • Erden, Deniz (1996). A survey of Foreign Direct Investment Firms in Turkey. Istanbul:Boğaziçi University Press.
  • Eriksson, Kent, Johanson, Jan, Anders Majkgard & Sharma, D. Deo (1997).Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process. Journal of International Business Studies. Second Quarter, 337-360.
  • Flowers, Edward Brown (1976). Oligopolistic Reactions in European and Canadian Direct Investment in the United States.Journal of International Business Studies. Fall/Winter, Vol. 7,43-55.
  • Forsgren, Mats (1989). Managing the Internationalization Process: The Swedish Case.London: Routledge.
  • Forsgren, M. (2002). The Concept of Learning in the Uppsala Internationalization Process Model: A Critical Review. International Business Review. 11, 257-277.
  • Giddy, Ian H. (1978). The Demise of the Product Cycle Model in International Business Theory. Columbia Journal of World Business. Spring.
  • Gray, Peter H. (1996). The Eclectic Paradigm: The Next Generation. Transnational Corporations. 5 (2), 51-65.
  • Grosse, Robert, & Behrman Jack N. (1992). Theory in International Business. Transnational Corporations. Vol. 1 (1), 93126.
  • Harrison, Andrew, Dalkıran, Ertuğrul, & Elsey, Ena (2000). International Business.NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
  • Hatch, Mary Jo (1997). Organization Theory: Modern. Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hedlund, G. (1986). The Hypermodern MNC-a Heterarchy?. Human Resources Management 25 (1), 9-35.
  • Hennart, Jean-Francois (1982). A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Hennart, Jean-Francois (1991). The Transaction Cost Theory of the Multinational Enterprise.In Benjamin Gomes-Casseres, & Yoffie,David B. (Ed.).The International Political of Direct Foreign Investment (pp.139-173), London: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
  • Holm, D.B, & Johanson, J. (1997). Business Network Connections and the Atmosphere of International Business. In Bjorkman, Ingmar, & Forsgren, Mats (Ed.), The Nature of International Firm Nordic Contributions To International Business Resarch.
  • Hulbert, J. M., & Brandt, W. (1980). Managing the Multinational Subsidiaries. NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Hymer, Stephen H. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Itaki, Masahiko (1991). A Critical Assessment of the Eclectic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies. 22 (3), 445-460.
  • Johanson J., & Lars-Gunnar Mattsson (1993). Internationalization in Industrial Systems-A Network Approach. In Buckley, Peter J., & Ghauri, Pervez N. (Ed.),The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Johanson J., & Wiedersheim-Paul F. (1993). The Internationalization of the Firm-Four Swedish Cases. In Buckley,Peter J., & Ghauri,Pervez N. (Ed.), The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Johanson J., & Vahine J. E. (1993). The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Market Commitment Investment: New Empirical Evidence. In Buckley,Peter J., & Ghauri, Pervez N. (Ed.), The Internationalization of the .Firm: A Reader. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Johanson J., & Vahine J. E. (1990). Mechanism of Internationalization. International Marketing Review. 7(4), 11-24.
  • Kallinikos, J. (1984). Control and Influence Relationships in Multinational Corporations: The Subsidiary' Viewpoint. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • Kindleberger, C.P. (1969). American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Knickerbocker, F. T. (1973). Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise.Boston: Harvard Business School.
  • Kuada John, & Olav Jull Sorensen (2000). Internationalization of Companies from Developing Countries. New York: International Business Press.
  • Larsson, A. (1985). Structure and Change: Power in the Transnational Enterprise. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • Lu, Jane W. (2002). Intra-and Inter-Organizational Imitative Behavior: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms' Entry Mode Choice. Journal of International Business Studies. First Quarter, 33 (1), 19-37.
  • Millington, Andrew I., & Brain T. Bayliss (1997). The Strategy of Internationalization and the Success of UK Transnational Manufacturing operations in the European Union. Management International Review. 37 (3), 199-221.
  • Mudambi, Ram, & Pietro Navarra (2002). Institutions and International Business: A Theoretical Overview. International Business Review, vol. 11, 635-646.
  • Oviatt, Benjamin M., & Patricia Phillips McDougall (1994). Toward a Theory of International New Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies. First Quarter.
  • Penrose, E. T. (1956). Foreign Investment and Growth of the Firm. Economic Journal,60,220-235.
  • Porter, Michael (1986). Changing Patterns of International Competition, California Management Review. 18 (2).
  • Powell, Walter W. (1990). Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 12,295-336.
  • Rugman, Alan M. (1980). A new Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: Internationalization Versus Internalization. The Columbia Journal of World Business, VXV, No.l, Spring, 23-29.
  • Rugman, Alan M. (1981). Inside The Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Rugman, Alan M. (1982). Inside the Multinationals. London: Croom Helm. Rugman, Alan M. (1999). Forty Years of the Theory of the Transnational Corporation. Transnational Corporations. Vol.8 (2), 51-70.
  • Rugman, Alan M., & Verbeke, Alain (2003). Extending the Theory of thee Multinational Enterprise: Internalization and Strategic Management Perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (2), 125-137.
  • Safarian, Edward A. (2003). Internalization and the MNE: A Note on the Spread of Ideas. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (2), 116-124.
  • Sullivan, Daniel (1998). Cognitive Tendencies in International Business Research: Implications of a 'Narrow Vision'. Journal of International Business Studies. Fourth Quarter, 29 (4), 837-861.
  • Sullivan, Daniel, & Bauerscmidt, Alan (1990). Incremental Internationalization: A Test of Johanson and Vahlne's Thesis. Management International Review. 30 (1), 19-30.
  • Thorelli, Hans (1986). Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7. 37-51.
  • Toyne, Brian (1997). The Conceptual Frontiers of International Business. In Iyanatul Islam, & William Shepherd (Ed.), Current Issues in International Business.Chetelman: Edward Elgar.
  • Toyne, Brian, & Nigh, Douglas (1998). A More Expansive View of International Business. Journal of International Business Studies. Fourth Quarter, 29 (4), 863-875.
  • Turnbull, PW. (1993). A Challenge to Stage Theory of Internationalization Process. In Buckley, Peter J., & Ghauri, Pervez N. (Ed.),The Internationalization of the Firm: A Reader. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Vernon, Raymond (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics. LXXX. 2 (May), 190-207.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
  • Williamson, O.E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 87, 548-577.
  • Zafarullah, Mohammad, Mujahid Ali, & Young, Stephen (1998). The Internationalization of the Small Firm in Developing Countries: Exploratory Research from Pakistan. Journal of Global Marketing, 11(3) 21-40.