The use of the internet by high school EFL teachers for professional purposes

Bu betimsel araştırma liselerde çalışan İngilizce öğretmenlerinin mesleki amaçla kullandığı websitelerini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın evreni 2010 -2011 Eğitim-Öğretim yılı bahar yarıyılındaDiyarbakır şehir merkezinde çalışan İngilizce öğretmenlerini kapsamaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemiise Anadolu liseleri ve özel liselerde çalışan 45 İngilizce öğretmeninden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamaamacıyla araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan bir anket kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları İngilizceöğretmenlerinin sırasıyla kendilerine kaynak sağlayan web sitelerini, sosyal ağları, sözlükleri, gazete,dergi ve blogları takip ettiklerini göstermiştir. Öğretmenlerin en çok kullandığı web s itelerininadresleri de çalışma kapsamında belirtilmiştir.

Liselerde çalışan ingilizce öğretmenlerinin interneti mesleki amaçla kullanımı

This article reports the findings of a descriptive study that aimed to examine the websites used byhigh school EFL teachers for professional purposes. The study included high school EnglishLanguage Teachers working in the city centre of Diyarbakır in the spring semester of 2010 -2011.Forty -five English teachers working at the Private High Schools and Anatolian High Schools in thecity were taken as samples. A questionnaire prepared by the researchers was used to collect data. Theresults revealed that the language teachers mostly followed resource websites, forums and socialnetworks, dictionaries, magazines, newspapers and blogs respective ly. A list of the websites that aremost commonly followed by EFL teachers is also presented in the study.

___

  • Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11,71 - 80.
  • Baltacı- Göktalay, Ş., Özdilek, Z. (2010). Pre- service teachers’ perceptions about Web 2.0 technologies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4737- 4741.
  • Braul, B. (2006). ESL teacher perceptions and attitudes toward using computer - assisted language learning (CALL): Recommendations for effective CALL practice. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Chai, C.S. & Lim, C.P. (2011). The Internet and teacher education: Traversing between the digitized world and schools . Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 3- 9.
  • Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L. & McCloskey, E . M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8- 19.
  • Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M. & Ueno, K. (2006). Are teachers who need sustained, content -focused professional development getting it? An administrator’s dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179- 215.
  • Dettori, G. & Lupi, V. (2010). ICT and new methodologies in language teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2712- 2716.
  • Empirica (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006- Final report from head teacher and classroom teacher surveys in 27 European countries. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society /eeurope/i2010/docs/studies/final_report_3.pdf
  • Kirschner, P. & Davis, N. (2003). Pedagogic benchmarks for information and communications technology in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12, 125 – 147.
  • Merriam- Webster Online (2011). Retrieved June 2011 from http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/blog
  • Morris, D. (2010). Are teachers technophobes? Investigating professional competency in the use of ICT to support teaching and learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4010- 4015.
  • Oliver, R., & Towers, S. (2000). Benchmarking ICT literacy in tertiary learning settings. In R. Sims, M. O'Reilly & S. Sawkins (Eds). Learning to choose:Choosing to learn. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 381 - 390). Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.), London: Sage.
  • Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A Retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39- 56.
  • Tezci, E. (2009). Teachers’ effect on ICT use in education: the Turkey sample. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1285- 1294.
  • Warschauer, M. (1996) , “Computer - assisted language learning: An introduction.” In Fotos, S. (ed.), Multimedia Language Teaching, (pp. 3- 20). Tokyo: Logos.
  • Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language teaching and learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbo ok of Undergraduate Second Language Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New Jersey.
  • Windeatt,S., Hardisty, D., & Eastment, D. (2000). The Internet: Resource books for teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.