Suturae cranii’nin morfolojik ve morfometrik değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, sutura coronalis, sutura sagittalis ve sutura lambdoidea sutural açıklığı morfolojisinin ve morfometrisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu amaç ile, cinsiyeti ve yaşı belli olmayan Anadolu populasyonuna ait 17 adet cranium sutural açıklık derecesine göre (Derece 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) analiz edilmiştir ve daha sonra sutura cranii uzunlukları elektronik kumpas ile ölçülmüştür. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda sutura coronalis Derece 0 %0, Derece 1 %67.85, Derece 2 %3.57, Derece 3 ve 4 ise %14.28 ; sutura sagittalis Derece 0 %0, Derece 1 %53.57, Derece 2 ve 3 %14.28, Derece 4 %17.85, sutura lambdoidea Derece 0 %0, Derece 1 %60.71, Derece 2 %14.28, Derece 3 %0, Derece 4 %7.14 olarak gözlenmiştir. Sutura coronalis, sutura sagittalis ve sutura lambdoidea uzunlukları ise sırası ile 116.80±7.70 mm, 106.59±7.18 mm, 109.05±6.76 mm olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımızın özellikle anatomi, antropoloji ve osteopatik manipulatif tıp ile ilgili literatüre katkıda bulunacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

sutura coronalis, sutura sagittalis, suturae cranii

Morphologic and morphometric evaluation of cranial sutures

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the sutural patency morphology and morphometry of sutura coronalis, sutura sagittalis and sutura lambdoidea. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, 17 Anatolian dry skulls with unknown sex and age were analyzed for sutural patency (Grade 0, 1, 2, 3, 4), and then, sutura cranii lengths were measured with sliding caliper. Results: In the present study, sutura coronalis was observed as Grade 0 with 0%, Grade 1 with 67.85%, Grade 2 with 3.57%, Grade 3 and 4 with 14.28%; sutura sagittalis was observed as Grade 0 with 0%, Grade 1 with 53.57, Grade 2 and 3 with 14.28%, Grade 4 with 17.85%; sutura lambdoidea was observed as Grade 0 with 0%, Grade 1 with 60.71%, Grade 2 with 14.28%, Grade 3 with 0%, Grade 4 with 7.14%. The lengths of sutura coronalis, sutura sagittalis and sutura lambdoidea were found as 116.80±7.70 mm, 106.59±7.18 mm, 109.05±6.76 mm, respectively. Conclusion: This study results will make contributions to literature data especially for anatomy, anthropology, osteopathic medicine researchers.

PDF

___

Kaynaklar1. Yücel AH. Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. Adana, Akademisyen Kitabevi, 2018.
2. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi 1. cilt. Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi, 2014.
3. Murlimanju BV, Gupta C, Samiullah D, Prabhu LV, Pai MM, Kumar CG, Somesh MS. Morphological investigation of cranial sutures in Indian human adult skulls. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2011; 52(3): 1097-1100.
4. Hershkovitz I, Latimer B, Dutour O, Jellema LM, Wish-Baratz S, Rothschild C, Rothschild BM. Why do we fail in aging the skull from the sagittal suture?. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. 1997; 103(3): 393-399.
5. Sabini RC, Elkowitz DE. Significance of differences in patency among cranial sutures. Journal-American Osteopathic Association, 2006; 106(10): 600-604.
6. Ozan H. Anatomi. Ankara, Klinisyen Tıp Kitabevleri, 2014.
7. Özbek Z, Vural M. Kranial sütürlerin biyolojisi, sütür büyüme gelişme ve kapanmasının regülasyonu. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi. 2017; 27(3): 245-250.
8. Hauser G, Manzi G, Vienna A, Stefano GF. Size and shape of human cranial sutures–a new scoring method. American Journal of Anatomy. 1991; 190(3): 231-244.
9. Todd TW, Lyon Jr DW. Endocranial suture closure: Its progress and age relationship-part I, adult males of white stock. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1924; 7(3): 325-384.
10. Cırpan S, Magden AO, Mas NG, Edizer M, Aksu F, Yonguc GN. The morphological grading and comparison of sutural patency among cranial sutures in dry human skulls. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2017; 28(8): 2155-2158.
11. Alves JC, Wafae GC, Coelho DDP, Wafae N, Coelho VDA, Pereira E, Ruiz CR. (2009). Sagittal suture of the human cranium and the time of closing. International Journal of Morphology. 2009; 27(2): 469-473.
12. Vasanthi A, Adinarayana KPS, Pujitha S. Morphologıcal study of wormıan bones in cadaver skulls. Journal of Evidence based Medicine and Healthcare. 2015; 2(12): 1793-1800.
13. Showri R, Suma MP. Study of wormian bones in adult human skulls. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016; 15(12): 54-60.