Basit ön Çapraz Kapanışın Daimi Dentisyon Döneminde Müteharrik Aparey ile Tedavisi: Vaka Raporu

Bu vaka raporunda, basit ön çapraz kapanışın müteharrik aparey kullanılarak daimi dentisyon döneminde tedavi edilmesi anlatılmaktadır. Ön dişlerinin kötü görünümü şikayeti olan 12 yaşındaki bayan hasta simetrik bir yüze ve yeterli dudak kapanışına sahipti. Ağız içi muayenesinde hastanın Sınıf I dişsel ilişki ile birlikte alt ve üst keser çapraşıklığının olduğu tespit edildi. Üst sol santral keser dişin lingual pozisyonlanmasına bağlı olarak dişsel çapraz kapanışın meydana geldiği görülmüş, alt sol santral keser dişin labiyal pozisyonlanmasına bağlı olarak okluzal travmaya maruz kaldığı belirlenmiştir. Alt sol santral keser dişin labiyal yüzündeki dişeti çekilmesinin travmatik oklüzyondan kaynaklandığı belirlenmiştir. Hastanın sabit tedavi bekleme sırasında olması sebebiyle, çapraz kapanışın düzeltilmesi ve okluzal travmanın bir an önce elimine edilmesi amacıyla müteharrik aparey tedavisinin yapılması kararlaştırılmıştır. Tedavi planı ısırma düzlemi ve labiolingual zemberekleri içeren müteharrik aparey tedavisi olarak belirlenmiştir. Beş aylık tedavi sonunda çapraz kapanış başarılı bir şekilde düzeltilmiş, alt ve üst bölgedeki çapraşıklık giderilmiş, okluzal travma elimine edilmiş, gülüş estetiği anlamlı ölçüde düzeltilmiştir. Doğru seçilmiş vakalarda (ergen hastalar da dahil olmak üzere) yeterli hasta kooperasyonunun olması durumunda, ön çapraz kapanış müteharrik apareyler ile başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edilebilir.

Treatment of Simple Anterior Crossbite with a Removable Appliance in the Permanent Dentition: A Case Report

This case report presents the treatment of a patient with a simple anterior crossbite using a removable appliance in the permanent dentition. The chief complaint of the 12-year-old female patient was the ugly appearance of her front teeth. She had a symmetrical face with competent lips, dental Class I canine and molar relationships, upper and lower anterior crowding, and an anterior dental crossbite because of a lingually positioned upper left central incisor. The lower left central incisor was labially positioned and was prone to occlusal trauma. Gingival recession on the labial surface of the lower left central incisor was considered to be because of a traumatic occlusion. The patient was on the waiting list for fixed orthodontic treatment; therefore, it was decided to perform removable appliance treatment as soon as possible to correct the crossbite, resolve the crowding, and eliminate the occlusal trauma. The treatment plan included a removable orthodontic appliance with a biteplate and finger springs. At the end of the 5-month treatment, the crossbite was successfully corrected, crowding was resolved, occlusal trauma was eliminated, normal overjet and overbite were achieved, and the smile esthetics significantly improved. In properly selected cases (even in adolescents), with cases involving good and satisfactory patient compliance, correction of a simple anterior crossbite can be successfully achieved using a removable appliance.

___

  • Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. Chicago: YearBook, Publishers Inc. 1973 p.564-77.
  • Lee BD. Correction of crossbite. Dent Clin North Am 1978; 22: 647-68.
  • Sim J. Minor tooth movement in children. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1977 p.243-71.
  • Valentine F, Howitt JW. Implications of early anterior crossbite correction. ASDC J Dent Child 1970; 37: 420-7.
  • Payne RC, Mueller BH, Thomas HF. Anterior cross bite in the primary den- tition. J Pedodont 1981; 5: 281-94.
  • Harrison RL, Leggott PJ, Kennedy DB, Loewe AA, Robertson PB. The asso- ciation of simple anterior dentalcrossbite to gingival margin discrepan- cy. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 296-300.
  • Andlin-Sobocki A, Bodin L. Dimensional alterations of the gingiva relat- ed to changes of facial/lingual tooth position in the permanent anterior teeth of children. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 219-24. [CrossRef]
  • Harrison R, Kennedy D, Leggott P. Anterior dental crossbite: relationship between incisor crown length and incisor irregularity before and after orthodontic treatment. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15: 394-7.
  • Dorfman HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 286-97. [CrossRef]
  • GEiger AM. Mucogingival problems and the movement of mandibular incisors: a clinical review. Am J Orthod 1980; 78: 511-27. [CrossRef]
  • Bimstein E, Crevoisier RA, King DL. Changes in the morphology of the buccal alveolar bone of protruded mandibular permanent incisors secondary to orthodontic alignment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 427-30. [CrossRef]
  • Clifford FO. Crossbite correction in the deciduous dentition: principles and procedures. Am J Orthod 1971; 59: 343-9. [CrossRef]
  • West EE. Treatment objectives in the deciduous dentition. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 617-32. [CrossRef]
  • Wright CF. Cross bites and their management. Angle Orthod 1953; 23: 35-45.
  • Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with ortho- dontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 26-34. [CrossRef]
  • Zachrison BU, Alnaes L. Periodontal condition in orthodontically treated and untreated children: I, loss of attachment, gingival pocket depth and clinical crown heights. Angle Orthod 1973; 43: 402-11.
  • Zachrison BU, Alnaes L. Periodontal condition in orthodontically treated and untreated individuals. Angle Orthod 1974; 44: 48-55. [CrossRef]
  • Sjolien T, Zachrison BU. Periodontal bone support and tooth length in or- thodontically treated persons. Am J Orthod 1973; 64: 28-37. [CrossRef]
  • Kloehn JS, Pfeifer JS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the peri- odontium. Angle Orthod 1974; 44: 127-34.
  • Polson AM, Subtelny JD, Meitner SW, Polson AP, Sommers EW, Iker HP, et al. Long-term periodontal status after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orth- od 1988; 93: 51-8. [CrossRef]
  • Kessler M. Interrelationships between orthodontics and periodontics. Am J Orthod 1976; 70: 154-72. [CrossRef]
  • Norton L. Periodontal considerations in orthodontic treatment. Dent Clin North Am 1981; 25: 117-30.
  • Pearson LE. Gingival heights of lower central incisors orthodontically treated and untreated. Angle Orthod 1968; 38: 337-9.
  • Robertson PB, Schultz LD, Levy BM. Occurrence and distribution of in- terdental gingival clefts following orthodontic movement into bicuspid extraction sites. J Periodontol 1977; 48: 232-5. [CrossRef]
  • Coatoam GW, Behrents RG, Bissada NF. The width of keratinized gingiva during orthodontic treatment: its significance and impact on periodon- tal status. J Periodontol 1981; 52: 307-13. [CrossRef]
  • Sillness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy: II, correlation be- tween oral hygiene and periodontal condition. ActaOdontol Scand 1964; 22: 121-35. [CrossRef]
  • Andreasen JO. Traumatic injuries of the teeth: injuries to developing teeth, disturbances in eruption. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1981: 304-8.
  • Andrade RN, Torres FR, Ferreira RFA, Catthorino F. Treatment of anterior crossbite and its influence on gingival recession. RGO-Revista Gaşcha de Odontologia 2014; 62: 411-6. [CrossRef]