Antecedents of union commitment in Turkish food and transportation sector

This study aims to examine the relationship between union commitment and a series of antecedents- general attitudes towards union, union satisfaction, perceived justice, union instrumentality, militancy- among 461 union members from food and transportation sectors in Turkey. Regression analysis was used to test the relationships between these antecedents and union commitment. Findings revealed that instrumentality explained the highest variance in union loyalty, then came the justice perception and perceived union support. Results suggested that members saw their relation with the union mostly as an economic one, but also perceived organizational support, procedural and interactional justice which reflects a social exchange approach appear to be important for level of union commitment. Implications of the study and recommendations for further studies are discussed.

___

Aryee, S., & Chay, Y. W. (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 154–160.

Aryee, S., Chay, Y.W., (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behavior and turnover intentions in a union context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1):154-160.

Bamberger, P. A., Kluger, A. N., & Suchard, R. (1999). The antecedents and consequences of union commitment: A meta-analysis. Academy ofManagement Journal, 42, 304–318.

Barling, J., Fullagar, C., & Kelloway, K. (1992). The union and its members: A psychological approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barkin, S. (1950). A trade unionist appraises management personel philosophy. Harvard Business Review, 28, 59-64.

Bayazıt, M. (2008). Endüstri Ilis kileri Iklimi ve Sendika ve Kuruma Baglılık, 1. Çalısma İlişkileri Kongresi. Bildiriler Kitabı, Sakarya, 53 -62.

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Shep pard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Bilgin, L. (2003). Sendik aya bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SosyalBilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 5, 12-31.

Bolton, D., Bagraim J.J., Witten, L., Mohamed, Y. & Others (2007). Explaining union participation: the effects of union commitment and demographic factors. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33, 74-79.

Demirbilek, T., Çakır, Ö.(2004). Sendikal Bağlılık , Petrol-İş Yayın:91, İstanbul.

Demirbilek, T., Çakır, Ö.(2006). İkili Bağlılık: Hem sendikaya hem de işletmeye bağlı olunabilir mi?, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakütesi Dergisi, Toker Dereli’ye Armağan , 55(1),125-141.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

Fiorito, J, Gallagher D.G., Fukami, C.V. (1988). Satisfaction with Union Representation. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 41, 294-307.

Folger, R., Konovsky. M.A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32:115-30.

Fullagar, C., Barling, J. (1991). Predictors and outcomes of different patterns of organisational and union loyalty. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64: 129-43.

Fullagar, C., Barlıng J. (1989). A longitudinal test of a model of the antecedents and consequences of union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 213-227.

Fullagar, C., Barling, J. (1987). "Towards A Model Of Union Commitment", Advances in Industrial and Labour Relations, Vol.4, pp43-78.

Fuller, J. B. & Hester, K. (2001). A closer look at the relationship between justice perceptions and union participation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1096-1105

Gallagher, D.G., Clark , P.F. (1989). Research on union commitment: Implications for labor. Labor Studies Journal, 52-71.

Gamage, P.N., Hewagama, G.V. (2012). Determinants of union participation of Public Sector Organizations in Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(1), 19-31.

Glick, W., Mirvis, P., & Harder, D. (1977). Union satisfaction and participation. Industrial Relations, 16, 141 –151.

Gordon, M. E., Philpot, J. W., Burt, R. E., Thompson, C. A., & Spiller, W. E. (1980). Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and an examination of its correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 479 –499.

Greenberg, J.(1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9 – 22.

Johnson, G.J., Johnson, W.R.(1992). The effect of Normative Influence on Union Loyalty: A regional comparison. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 33, 216-222.

Korsgaard, M.A., Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of ınstrumental and non -ınstrumental voice in performance appraisal discu ssions. Journal of Management. 21, 657-669.

Kuruvilla, S, Gallagher, D.G.& Wetzel, K.(1993). An investigation of member-union attitude formation: evidence from Sweden and Canada Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 499-515.

Leung, K., Chiu, W., & Au, Y. (1993). Sympathy and support for industrial actions: A justice analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 781-787.

Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational CitizenshipBehaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.

Morrow, P.C., McElroy, J. (2006). Union Loyalty Antecedents: A Justice Perspective. Journal of Labor Research, 27, 75-87.

Mellor, S..(1990). The Relationship between Membership Decline and Union Commitment: A Field Study of Local Unions in Crisis.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 258 –267.

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76, 845 –855.

Newton, L. A., Shore, L. M. (1992). A model of union membership: Instrumentality, commitment, and opposition. Academy of Management Review, 17,275-298.

Snape, E, Redman, T. (2006). The Consequences of Dual and Unilateral Commitment: Evidence from the Health Service. Durham University Working Paper, http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/dbs/faculty//working-papers/WP-102-Feb06.pdf. Uçkan, B. (2007). From the perspective of EU integration: Trade union rights in Turkey. South-East Europe Review, 107 – 126

Urhan, B. (2004). Sendikal Örgütlenme Bunalımı ve Türkiye’deki Durum. İstanbul: Petrol-Is Yayınları.

Tetrick, L.E., Shore L.M., McClurg, L. & Vanderberg R. (2007). A model of union participation: The impact of perceived union support, union instrumentality, and union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 820-828.

Tan, H.H., Aryee, S., (2002), Antecedents and outcomes of union loyalty: A constructive replication and an extension, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4):715-722.

Yorgun, S. (2007). Dirilişin Eşiğinde Sendikalar. İstanbul: Ekin Yayınları.