___

• REFERENCES 1. Toumi M, Lesieur E, Haumonte JB, Blanc J, D'ercole C, Bretelle F. Primary cesarean delivery rate: Potential impact of a checklist. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47 (9):419-24. 2. Çintesun E, Al RA. The effect of increased number of cesarean on maternal and fetal outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(11):613-9. 3. OECD. Caesarean section. In: Lafortune G. editor. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD publishing; 2015. 4. Sukru Budak M, Temur M. A national measure to reduce primary cesarean rates in Turkey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct 10:1-4. 5. Brixval CS, Axelsen SF, Lauemøller SG, Andersen SK, Due P, Koushede V. The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes - a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:20. 6. Di Giovanni P, Garzarella T, Di Martino G, Schioppa FS, Romano F, Staniscia T. Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):514. 7. World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015; 23(45):149–50. 8. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2): e0148343. 9. Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):e5-8.10. Kızılırmak A, Başer M. The effect of education given to primigravida women on fear of childbirth. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:19-24. 11. Serçekuş P, Başkale H. Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment. Midwifery. 2016;34:166-72. 12. Mehdizadeh A, Roosta F, Chaichian S, Alaghehbandan R. Evaluation of the impact of birth preparation courses on the health of the mother and the newborn. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(1):7-9. 13. Cantone D, Pelullo CP, Cancellieri M, Attena F. Can antenatal classes reduce the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy? Women Birth. 2017;30(2):e83-e88. 14. Phipps H, Charlton S, Dietz HP. Can antenatal education influence how women push in labour? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(3):274-8. 15. Escott D, Slade P, Spiby H. Preparation for pain management during childbirth: the psychological aspects of coping strategydevelopment in antenatal education. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(7):617-22. 16. Fabian HM, Rådestad IJ, Waldenström U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women's opinion and possibleoutcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84(5):436-43. 17. Paz-Pascual C, Pinedo IA, Grandes G, de Gamboa GR, Hermosilla IO, de la Hera AB, et al. Design and process of the EMA Cohort Study: the value of antenatal education in childbirth and breastfeeding. BMC Nurs. 2008;7:5. 18. Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Remiro-Fernandezdegamboa G, Odriozola-Hermosilla I, Bacigalupe A, et al. The benefits of antenatal education for the childbirth process in Spain. Nurs Res. 2010;59(3):194-202.