AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDEN ÇIKMA HAKKI VE AVRUPA KİMLİĞİ ARASINDA BİR BAĞLANTI VAR MIDIR? BREXIT ÖRNEĞİ

Lizbon Antlaşması’nda yapılan en temel düzenlemelerden biri, üye ülkelere Avrupa Birliği’nden (AB) çıkma hakkı getiren 50.maddedir. 2016 senesinde Birleşik Krallık’ta yapılan referandumda, Birleşik Krallık vatandaşları Birlik’ten ayrılmak yönünde oy kullanmış ve Birleşik Krallık AB’den ayrılmayı tercih eden ilk ülke olmuştur. AB’de ortak bir kimlik oluşturulması en önemli meselelerden biri olup, AB düzeyindeki hukuki düzenlemelerle de bağlantılıdır. Makalede, AB’de kimlik kavramı, AB’deki hukuki düzenlemelerin Avrupa kimliği oluşturmaktaki rolü ve çıkma hakkıyla AB’deki kimlik konusu arasındaki ilişki Brexit örneği göz önüne alınarak incelenecektir.

IS THERE ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU AND EUROPEAN IDENTITY? THE BREXIT CASE

One of the main regulations made in the Treaty of Lisbon is Article 50, which brought the right of withdrawal from the European Union (EU) to the member states. In the referendum that was held in the UK in 2016, the UK citizens voted to leave the Union and the UK became the first country that preferred to withdraw from the EU. The construction of European identity in the EU has been one of the most significant issues related to legal regulations at the EU level. This article will examine the concept of identity in the EU, the role of the legal regulations in the EU in the construction of European identity, and the relationship between the right of withdrawal and identity in the EU by analyzing the Brexit case.

___

  • Baykal, S. (2005). Unity in Diversity? The Challenge of Diversity for the European Political Identity, Legitimacy and Democratic Governance: Turkey’s EU Membership as the Ultimate Test Case. Jean Monnet Working Paper, 09 (05), 1-78.
  • Bentzen, N. & A. D’Alfonso, A. (2019, April) EU Cooperation with Greenland. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637922/EPRS_BRI(2019)637922_EN.pdf
  • Bergbauer, S. (2018). Explaining European Identity Formation: Citizens’ Attachment from Maastricht Treaty to Crisis. Springer.
  • Cerutti, F. (2001). Towards the Political Identity of the Europeans: An Introduction. In F. Cerutti,& E. Rudolph (Eds.), A Soul For Europe: Vol.1 A Reader (pp. 1-31). Va.: Peeters.
  • Closa, C. (2017). Changing EU internal borders through democratic means. Journal of European Integration, 39 (5), 515-528.
  • Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, 2012, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  • Consolidated Version of the Treaty On The Functioning Of The European Union, 2012, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN
  • Craig, P. (2017). Development of the EU. In C. Barnard & S. Peers (Eds.), European Union Law (pp. 9-36). Oxford University Press.
  • De Vries, C.E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford University Press.
  • Delanty, G. (2006). Borders in a Changing Europe: Dynamics of Openness and Closure. Comparative European Politics, 4, 183-202.
  • Eder, K. (2006). Europe’s Borders: The Narrative Construction of the Boundaries of Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 9 (2), 255-271.
  • Eising, R. (2019). Interest Groups and the European Union. In M. Cini & N. Perez-Solorzano Borragan (Eds.), European Union Politics (pp. 201-218). Oxford University Press.
  • EU Citizenship Report 2020 Factsheet. (2020, December 15). Retrieved June 23, 2021, from
  • https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/eu_citizenship_report_2020_-_factsheet_en.pdf
  • EU Referendum Results. (n.d.). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/politics/eu_referendum/results
  • Fligstein, N., Polyakova, A. & Sandholtz, W. (2012). European Integration, Nationalism and European Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50 (S1), 106-122.
  • Free movement of Persons. (2019). European Parliament Fact Sheets on the European Union. Retrieved March 29, 2019, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/147/free-movement-of-persons
  • Glencross, A. (2016). Why the UK voted for Brexit: David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and State. Harvard University Press Cambridge.
  • Hobolt, S.B. & Wratil, C. (2015). Public Opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of the support for the euro. Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (2), 238-256.
  • Hobolt, S.B. (2016). The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (9), 1259-1277.
  • Hofmeister, H. (2010). ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go?’- A Critical Analysis of the Right to Withdraw from the EU. European Law Journal, 16 (5), 589–603.
  • Ifversen, J. (2002). Europe and European Culture- A Conceptual Analysis. European Societies, 4 (1), 1-26.
  • McCormick, J. (2016). Why Europe Matters for Britain: The Case for Remaining In. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Morphet, J. (2017). Beyond Brexit? How to assess the UK’s future. Policy Press.
  • Mummendey, A. & Waldzus, S. (2004). National Differences and European Plurality: Discrimination or Tolerance between European Countries. In R.K. Herrmann, T. Risse & M.B. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 59-72). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Peers, S. & Harvey, D. (2017). Brexit: The Legal Dimension. In C. Barnard & S.Peers (Eds.), European Union Law (pp. 815-836). Oxford University Press.
  • Risse, T. (2009). Social Constructivism and European Integration. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory (pp. 144-160). Oxford University Press.
  • Risse, T. (2010). A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Cornell University Press.
  • Scalise, G. (2015). The Narrative Construction of European Identity: Meanings of Europe ‘from Below’. European Societies, 17 (4), 593-614.
  • Schmidt, V.A. (2011). The problems of identity and legitimacy in the European Union: Is more politics the answer?. In S. Lucarelli, F. Cerutti & V.A. Schmidt (Eds.), Debating Political Identity and Legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 17-37). Routledge.
  • Standard Eurobarometer 85 European Citizenship (2016, Spring). Retrieved October 10, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/STANDARD/
  • Standard Eurobarometer 89 European Citizenship. (2018, Spring). Retrieved March 29, 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion
  • Standard Eurobarometer 94. (2020-2021, Winter). Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2355
  • Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, 1957, https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/cca6ba28-0bf3-4ce6-8a76-6b0b3252696e/publishable_en.pdf
  • Weiler, JHH. (1998). To be a European Citizen – Eros and Civilization. Working Paper Series in European Studies, Special Edition, 1-52.
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Beykoz Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

AĞ TOPLUMU YAKLAŞIMI İLE AKADEMİK BİR SOSYAL AĞ MODELİ İÇİN GRAF VERİ TABANI ÖNERİSİ

Alper DEĞERLİ

NEOLİBERALİZM VE ŞEHİRLERİN YENİ KÜLTÜREL KOŞULLARI

Eda Aylin GENÇ

ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN ÇALIŞAN SESLİLİĞİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Ömer GİZLİER

ATATÜRK’ÜN YÖNETİM ORGANİZASYON ALANINA BİR KATKISI: SEVGİ- SAYGI, GÜVEN – OTORİTEYE İTAAT, İŞ DİSİPLİNİ VE HUZURUN KARİYER BAŞARISINA ETKİSİ

Elif BİLGİNOĞLU, Uğur YOZGAT, İnci ERDEM ARTAN

HAVALİMANI KENTİ KAVRAMI: TÜRKİYE’DEKİ BAZI HAVALİMANLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Atiye TÜMENBATUR, Mehmet TANYAŞ

HAVACILIKTA NİTELİKLİ İNSAN KAYNAĞI YETİŞTİRME SORUNUNUN ÜNİVERSİTELERDEKİ SİVİL HAVA ULAŞTIRMA İŞLETMECİLİĞİ VE HAVACILIK YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMLERİNDE GÖREV ALAN AKADEMİK KADROLARIN NİTELİĞİ-NİCELİĞİ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Sibel BİLKAY

KÜLTÜRÜN SOSYAL MEDYA KULLANIM MOTİVASYONU ÜZERİNDEKI ETKİSİ: TÜRK VE ALMAN LİSE ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ÇALIŞMA

Selçuk KIRAN, Fatma Göksu DEMİRÇEVİREN

YÜKSEK ÖĞRENİM KURUMLARININ SOSYAL ETKİLERİNİN ÖLÇÜMÜ ÜZERİNE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZ

Pınar Gökçin ÖZUYAR, Esra BAYHANTOPÇU

AFET BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA LOJİSTİK DEPO YERİ SEÇİMİ: İSTANBUL BEYKOZ İLÇESİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Celil DURDAĞ, Sabri ERGENECOŞAR, Zeynel KINIK, Kurthan Kubilay YILMAZ

BARIŞ PINARI HAREKÂTININ GÜNDEM BELİRLEME TEORİSİ AÇISINDAN MEDYADA YER ALMA DURUMUNUN İNCELENMESİ

Münür İPEK, Ahmet KANILMAZ