Hazırlık Sınıfı Öğrencilerinin Öz-Yeterlik İnançları ve Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejileri ve Bunların Dil Yeterlilikleri ile İlişkisi

Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin farklı yeterlik düzeylerinde öz-yeterlik inançlarını ve öz-düzenlemeli strateji kullanımını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Buna uygun olarak, bu çalışma öğrencilerin öz-yeterlik inançları ve Öz düzenlemeli öğrenme (ÖDÖ) stratejilerinin kullanımı arasındaki ilişkiyi keşfetmeyi ve öz-yeterlik inançlarının, öğrencilerin ÖDÖ stratejileri kullanımının ve cinsiyetin yeterlik düzeylerini ne derecede yordayabildiğini bulabilmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, 2017-2018 eğitim-öğretim yılında Ankara’daki özel bir üniversitede yürütülmüştür. Katılımcıların hepsi İngilizceyi ikinci dil olarak öğrenen A2(n=35), B1(n=27) ve B2(n=30) yeterlik seviyeli hazırlık sınıfı öğrencileridir ve uygun örneklem yöntemiyle seçilmişlerdir. Çalışmanın verileri 2 adet Likert tipi ölçekle toplanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, A2 ve B2 seviyesi arasındaki katılımcıların dinleme ve yazma becerileri arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğunu ortaya çıkardı. Çalışmanın sonuçları, yeterlik seviyelerine bakmaksızın katılımcıların özyeterlik inançları ve ÖDÖ stratejileri arasında orta düzeyde anlamlı bir olumlu ilişki olduğunu ortaya koydu. Mevcut çalışmanın, öz-yeterlik ve ÖDÖ stratejilerini müfredata dâhil etme gibi özellikle yükseköğrenimdeki ikinci yabancı dil eğitimi için bazı çıkarımları vardır.

Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies of Preparatory School Students and Their Relation with Language Proficiency Levels

The main purpose of this study is to uncover preparatory school students’ selfefficacy beliefs and self-regulated strategy use in different proficiency levels. In accordance with this, this study aims to find out the relation between self-efficacy beliefs of students and their use of SRL strategies, and figure out to what extent selfefficacy beliefs, SLR strategies use of students and sex can predict their proficiency level. The study was conducted at a private university in Ankara in the academic year 2017-2018. The participants are all preparatory class students with A2 (n=35), B1 (n=27) and B2 (n=30) level of proficiency in English as an L2 and were recruited by convenience sampling method. Data of the study were collected through two questionnaires involving Likert type items. The findings of the study revealed that there was a significant difference for listening and writing efficacy of participants between A2 and B2 level. Also, there is a significant positive correlation at moderate level between self-efficacy beliefs and SRL strategies use of participants regardless of their proficiency level. The current study has some implications for L2 language education especially in higher education such as including self-efficacy and SRL strategies into their curriculum.

___

  • Altay, B., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2017). Investigation on the Relationship among Language Learning Strategies, Critical Thinking and Self-Regulation Skills in Learning English. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 11(1), 1-26.
  • Ayoobiyan, H., & Soleimani, T. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A case of Iranian medical students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 158-167.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Banisaeid, M., & Huang, J. (2015). The role of motivation in self-regulated learning and language learning strategy: In the case of Chinese EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5), 36-43.
  • Basso, F. P., & Abrahão, M. H. M. B. (2018). Teaching activities that develop learning self-regulation. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, 43(2), 495-511.
  • Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 239-253.
  • Chamot, A. U. (2014). Developing self-regulated learning in the language classroom. Proceedings of CLaSIC 2014, 78-88.
  • Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248-263.
  • Cohen, A., & Macaro, E. (Eds.). (2007). Language learner strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Ellis, R. (1989). Second language learning and second language learners: Growth and diversity. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 74-94.
  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-293.
  • Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1995). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63–84). New York: MacMillan Library Reference USA.
  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–383.
  • Harris, K. (1990). Developing self-regulated learners: The role of private speech and self-instructions. Educational Psychologist, 25, 35-49.
  • Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A.G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399–415.
  • Hsiao, T., & Oxford, R. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368–383.
  • Huang, S. C., Lloyd, P., & Mikulecky, L. (1999). ESL literacy self-efficacy: Developing a new scale. Retrieved from ERIC (Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427541).
  • Kim, D. H, Wang, C., Ahn, H. S., & Bong, M. (2015). English language learners' self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136-142.
  • Köksal, D., & Dündar, S. (2018). Developing a scale for self-regulated L2 learning strategy use. H. U. Journal of Education, 33(2), 337-352.
  • Lastochkina, T., & Smirnova, N. (2017). Fostering economics students’ listening skills through self-regulated learning. Journal of Language and Education, 3(3), 60-67.
  • Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Eds.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3-33). Plenum: New York.
  • Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System 35(3), 338-352.
  • Mahadi, R., & Subramaniam, G. (2013). The role of meta-cognitive self-regulated learning strategies in enhancing language performance: A theoretical and empirical review. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(6), 570- 577.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A revaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 276–295.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French Students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417–442.
  • Morshedian, M., Sotoudehnama, E., Hemmati, F., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The impact of training EFL learners in self-regulation of reading on their EFL literal and critical reading comprehension: Implementing a model. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 35(2), 99-122.
  • Ömür, M., & Çubukçu, F. (2017). Investigating the relationship between foreign language learners’ use of selfregulation strategies and their level of motivation. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES), 3(2), 18-33.
  • Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 111–139). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pajares, F. (2009). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111–139). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 239- 266). London: Ablex Publishing.
  • Pape, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behaviour: Classification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem-solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419–449.
  • Park, G. P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 211–221.
  • Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners’ self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 14-28.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children’s self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 347–369.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviours. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173–208.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
  • Şeker, M., & Dinçer, A. (2016). Teacher transformation as a basis for the promotion of self-regulated language strategies. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 7(1), 2206-2210.
  • Su, M. H., & Duo, P. C. (2012). EFL learners’ language learning strategy use and perceived self- efficacy. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(3), 335-345.
  • Tilfarlioğlu, F. T., & Ciftci, F. S. (2011). Supporting self-efficacy and learner autonomy in relation to academic success in EFL classrooms (A Case Study). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1284-1294.
  • Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of selfregulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102.
  • Tsuda, A., & Nakata, Y. (2013). Exploring self-regulation in language learning: a study of Japanese high school EFL students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 72-88.
  • Wang, C., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Chang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2012). Chinese college students' self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Research in Education, 22(2), 103–135.
  • Wong, M. S. L. (2005). Language learning strategies and language self-efficacy: Investigating the relationship in Malaysia. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 245-269.
  • Yılmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioural, 2, 682–687.
  • Yeşilbursa, A., & Bilican, R. (2013). Validation of self-regulatory capacity in vocabulary learning scale in Turkish. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 882-886.
  • Yüce, E. (2019). Self-regulated learning perceptions of foreign language learners: A cross-sectional study. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(1), 36-46.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73-86.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi