As food can gather and segregate people, this research aims to explore whether halal and non-halal food create distinct territories in Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape. The case study is an exclusive territorial concentration called Glodok, where the ethnic minority and non-Muslim Chinese-Indonesian community reside, eat, and shop. Jakarta’s Chinatown is also well known as one of the culinary destinations for Chinese food, which is associated with non-halal food. Since foodscape reflects the relationship between food and other urban elements in a multidimensional layer, this study applied a comprehensive multilayered mapping to record food territories through observation. The study reveals three main findings. First, the superimposed food layers reveal no indication of strict boundaries between halal and non-halal food territories. Second, either halal or non-halal food territories have their historical background, origin, and food activities that influence the territories’ characteristics. Third, the building elements, food displayed, cooking activities, and eating activities denote halal and non-halal food territories. This research provided a new perspective on how halal and non-halal food territories’ presence creates a specific urban foodscape without strict spatial segregation. In this case, non-halal Chinese food and halal food from various cultural backgrounds contribute to the inclusive urban space and spatial integration in the ethnic Chinese quarter, which supports and maintains the relationships between people from varied backgrounds. "> [PDF] The characteristics of halal and non-halal food territories in multilayered mapping of Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape | [PDF] The characteristics of halal and non-halal food territories in multilayered mapping of Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape As food can gather and segregate people, this research aims to explore whether halal and non-halal food create distinct territories in Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape. The case study is an exclusive territorial concentration called Glodok, where the ethnic minority and non-Muslim Chinese-Indonesian community reside, eat, and shop. Jakarta’s Chinatown is also well known as one of the culinary destinations for Chinese food, which is associated with non-halal food. Since foodscape reflects the relationship between food and other urban elements in a multidimensional layer, this study applied a comprehensive multilayered mapping to record food territories through observation. The study reveals three main findings. First, the superimposed food layers reveal no indication of strict boundaries between halal and non-halal food territories. Second, either halal or non-halal food territories have their historical background, origin, and food activities that influence the territories’ characteristics. Third, the building elements, food displayed, cooking activities, and eating activities denote halal and non-halal food territories. This research provided a new perspective on how halal and non-halal food territories’ presence creates a specific urban foodscape without strict spatial segregation. In this case, non-halal Chinese food and halal food from various cultural backgrounds contribute to the inclusive urban space and spatial integration in the ethnic Chinese quarter, which supports and maintains the relationships between people from varied backgrounds. ">

The characteristics of halal and non-halal food territories in multilayered mapping of Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape

The characteristics of halal and non-halal food territories in multilayered mapping of Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape

As food can gather and segregate people, this research aims to explore whether halal and non-halal food create distinct territories in Jakarta’s Chinatown urban foodscape. The case study is an exclusive territorial concentration called Glodok, where the ethnic minority and non-Muslim Chinese-Indonesian community reside, eat, and shop. Jakarta’s Chinatown is also well known as one of the culinary destinations for Chinese food, which is associated with non-halal food. Since foodscape reflects the relationship between food and other urban elements in a multidimensional layer, this study applied a comprehensive multilayered mapping to record food territories through observation. The study reveals three main findings. First, the superimposed food layers reveal no indication of strict boundaries between halal and non-halal food territories. Second, either halal or non-halal food territories have their historical background, origin, and food activities that influence the territories’ characteristics. Third, the building elements, food displayed, cooking activities, and eating activities denote halal and non-halal food territories. This research provided a new perspective on how halal and non-halal food territories’ presence creates a specific urban foodscape without strict spatial segregation. In this case, non-halal Chinese food and halal food from various cultural backgrounds contribute to the inclusive urban space and spatial integration in the ethnic Chinese quarter, which supports and maintains the relationships between people from varied backgrounds.

___

  • Adema, P. (2009). Garlic capital of the world. Gilroy, garlic and the making of a festive foodscape. Jackson: The University Press of Mississippi.
  • Ahmadi, D. (2018). Diversity and social cohesion. The case of Jane-Finch: A highly diverse lower income Toronto neighborhood. Urban Research, and Practice, 11(2), 139-158.
  • Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Amoroso, N. (2010). The exposed city. Mapping the urban invisibles. New York: Routledge.
  • Ancuţa, C. (2010). Territorial disparities in the Romanian Banat: Assessment, dynamics and impact on the territorial system. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, VIII(1), 83-100.
  • Armanios, F., & Ergene, B. (2018). Halal food: A history. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Borrelli, N., & Mela, A. (2018). Food, city and territory: Some reflections from a socio-spatial point of view. City, Territory and Architecture, 5(7), 1-8.
  • Bromokusumo, A. (2013). Peranakan Tionghoa dalam kuliner Nu santara. Jakarta: Kompas.
  • Delaney, D. (2005). Territory. A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  • De Landa, M. (2010). Deleuze: History and science. New York: Atropos. FAO. (1997). General guidelines for use of the term “halal”. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/input/download/ standards/352/CXG_024e.pdf
  • Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Gottmann, J. (1973). The significance of territory. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.
  • Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art. Deleuze and the framing of earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Horwitz, J., & Singley, P. (2004). Eating architecture. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Jakarta City Government and Culture Office. (2014). Jakarta, heritage, and culture. Jakarta: Jakarta City Government Tourism and Culture Office.
  • Komala, O. N., Ellisa, E., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2017). Reading Urban Ingredients: What characterizes eating out space in urban spatial context. Environment – Behaviour Proceedings Journal, Vol. 2, No. 6. November 2017 (pp. 319-333). Sheffield: e-International Publishing House, Limited.
  • Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura. (2015). Eating establishment scheme, Singapore. Retrieved from https://www. muis.gov.sg/
  • Manur, A. (2007). Culinary nostalgia: Authenticity, nationalism, and diaspora. Oxford Journals, Melus, 32(4), 11-31.
  • Merrillees, S. (2015). Jakarta: Portraits of a capital, 1950 – 1980. Jakarta: Equinox Publishing.
  • Mintz, S. W., & Du Bois, C. M. (2002). The anthropology of food and eating. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 99-119.
  • Muhammad, R., Zahari, M.S.M., Kamaruddin, M.S.Y., & Ahmat, N.C. (2013). The alteration of Malaysian festival foods and its foodways. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 230 – 238.
  • Muhammad, R., Zahari, M.S.M., Shariff, M.S.M., & Abdullah, K.,M. (2016). Malaysian foodways: Acculturation/assimilation towards authenticity sustainability among diasporic community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 367-373.
  • PP Nomor 31 Tahun 2019. (2019). Peraturan Pelaksanaan UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal. Retrieved from http://www.halalmui.org/
  • Prada-Trigo, J. (2018). Tourism, territory and cuisine: Food consideration and perceptions regarding origin and social changes: the case of Guinea pig. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 16(4), 400-415.
  • Omholt, T. (2015). Developing a theoretical framework to analyze an urban culinary culture and explain restaurant cluster developments. Journal of Place Management and Development, 8(3), 233-253.
  • Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Khu sus Ibukota Jakarta. (2014). Peraturan gubernur propinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, tentang Rencana Induk Kawasan Kota Tua, Jakarta. Retrieved from https://dcktrp.jakarta. go.id/beranda/v.1/assets/file/peraturan/ LAMPIRAN_PERGUB_NO_36_TA HUN_2014.pdf
  • Persatuan Wartawan Indonesia Ja karta Barat. (2007). Pancoran riwayatmu. Jakarta.
  • Riaz, M. N., & Chaudry, M. M. (2004). Halal food production. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Sack, R.D. (1983). Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(1), 55-74.
  • Salama, A.M., Remali, A. M., & MacLean, L. (2017). Deciphering urban life: A multi-layered investigation of St. Enoch Square, Glasgow City Centre. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(2), 137-156.
  • Sobal, J., & Wansink, B. (2007). Kitchenscapes, tablescapes, platescapes, and foodscapes: Influences of microscale built environments of food intake. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 124-142.
  • Song, D. (2018). Spatial process and cultural territory of Islamic food restaurants in Itaewon, Seoul. In F.L. Collins, A.E. Lai,, & B. S. Yeoh (Eds.), Migration and diversity in Asian context (pp. 233- 253). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Strandsbjerg, J. (2010). Territory, globalization and international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tan, M. (2002). Chinese dietary culture in Indonesian urban society. In D. Y H. Wu, & S. C. H. Cheung (Eds.), The globalization of Chinese food (pp. 152-169). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press
  • Tricarico, L., & Geissler, J.B. (2017). The food territory: Cultural identity as local facilitator in the gastronomy sector, the Case of Lyon, City. Territory and Architecture, 4(16), 1-9.
  • Tunas, D. (2009). The spatial economy in the urban informal settlement. Delft: IFoU-Papiroz.
  • Turner, S., & Allen, P. (2007). Chinese Indonesians in a rapidly changing nation: Pressures of ethnicity and identity. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(1), 112-127.
  • Twiss, K. (2012). The archaeology of food and social diversity. Journal of Archaeological Research, 20(4), 357-395.
  • Van Esterik, P. (2008). Food culture in Southeast Asia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2008). Intercultural cities, planning for diversity advantage. London: Earthscan.
  • Wu, D. Y. H., & Cheung, S. C. H. (2002). The globalization of Chinese food. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.