An enabling technique for describing experiences in architectural environments

Experience is everything that appears to consciousness during the encounter of a human being with an environment. A survey that helps people introspect about their place experience and capture that experience through words will be pre sented. The Environmental Description Survey is an enabling technique in which participants first comment about their experiences by completing a series of sentences, e.g., related to their liking for some architectural element (qualitative part of the survey), and then they are asked to rate their experiences in a 1–10 scale; e.g., How much do you like that architectural element? (quantitative part). The survey is answered after the participants have made an exploratory itinerary in the environment but still being in that environment. The most frequent experiences presented to 35 participants who visited an architecturally relevant area of the Santa Lucía Riverwalk in Monterrey, Mexico, were discovered through the survey. In addition to the frequency of the commented experiences, the quantitative data obtained correspond to the intensity of the experiences, the personal importance they had for the participants, and the chronological order in which they were presented during the visit to the place. The results obtained through the survey reveal the possibilities of experience that an architectural environment can generate in people. The hybrid technique presented also allows to discover the more relevant aspects of a place related to environmental preferences. Considering the data obtained through this technique during an architectural or landscape design may result in places capable of generating positive human experiences.

PDF

___

Ayataç, H., İnce, E.C., Türer Başkaya, F.A., Kürkçüoğlu, E., Çelik. Ö., & Becerik Altındiş, S. (2020). Evaluating visitors’ perceptions of squares: Evidence from Istanbul. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 17(1), 1-11.
Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). A Defense of Introspection from Within. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 269-279.
Boden, Z., Larkin, M., & Iyer, M. (2019). Picturing ourselves in the world: Drawings, interpretative phenomenological analysis and the rela tional mapping interview. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 218-236.
Borg, I., & Groenen, P.J.F. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
Borji, A., Sihite, D.N., & Itti, L. (2013). Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Sa liency Modeling: A Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22(1), 55-69.
Calway, B.A., & Sykes, J.A. (1996). Grammatical Conversion of De scriptive Narrative - an application of discourse analysis in conceptual modelling. Australasian Journal of In formation Systems, 3(2), 10-19.
Cele, S. (2006). Communicating Place: Methods for Understanding Children’s Experience of Place. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Chandler, J., & Owen, M. (2002). Developing Brands with Qualitative Market Research. London: SAGE.
Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y.N., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Navarrete, G., González-Mora, J.L., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors. CORTEX, 126, 217-241.
Dall’Alba, G. (2000). Reflections on some faces of phenomenography. In J.A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 83-101). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Daly, S.R., Adams, R.S., & Bodner, G.M. (2012). What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals’ Experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187-219.
De Matteis, F., Bille, M., Griffero T., & Jelić A. (2019). Phenomenographies: describing the plurality of atmospheric worlds. Ambiances, 5, 1-22.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2012). Arquitectura: el diseño de una experiencia [Architecture: The Design of an Experience] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech, Spain.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2013). Architecture: the design of an experience / Architektūra: patirties projektavimas. Limes: Borderland Studies, 6(1), 1-20.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2016). The immaterial and atmospheric in architectural representation. The Internation al Journal of Visual Design, 10(2), 1-15.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2019). Visualization of architectural experiences using heat maps. The International Jour nal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 13(1), 17-34.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2020). Subjective experience and visual atten tion to a historic building: a real-world eye-tracking study. Frontiers of Architec tural Research, 9, 774-804.
de la Fuente Suárez, L.A., & Millán Gómez, A. (2012). Experience and il lusion: architecture as a perceptual catalyser. In N. Patricios, & S. Alifragkis (Eds.), Construction: Essays on Architec tural History, Theory & Technology (pp. 137-155). Athens: Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER).
Ding, C.S. (2018). Fundamentals of Applied Multidimensional Scaling for Educational and Psychological Research. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Englander, M. (2012). The Interview: Data Collection in Descriptive Phenomenological Human Scientific Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13-35.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol Analysis, Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gibson, J.J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
Giorgi, A. (2012). The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method. Journal of Phenomenological Psy chology, 43, 3-12.
Gould, S.J. (2006). Unpacking the many faces of introspective consciousness: a metacognitive–poststructuralist exercise. In R.W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Mar keting (pp. 186-197). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Groenen, P.J.F., & Borg, I. (2013). The Past, Present, and Future of Multidimensional Scaling. (Report No. EI 2013-07). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotter dam, Erasmus School of Economics, Econometric Institute.
Herzog, T.R. (1992). A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 237-248.
Holl, S. (1994a). Phenomenal Zones. In S. Holl, J. Pallasmaa, & A. Pérez-Gó- mez, Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture (pp. 43-119). Tokyo: A+U Publishing.
Holl, S. (1994b). Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture. In S. Holl, J. Pallasmaa, & A. Pérez-Gómez, Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture (pp. 39-42). Tokyo: A+U Publishing.
Hurlburt, R.T. (2011). Investigating pristine inner experience: Moments of truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hurlburt, R.T., & Heavey, C.L (2006). Exploring Inner Experience: The descriptive experience sampling method. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publish ing Company.
Hurlburt, R.T., & Heavey, C.L. (2015). Investigating pristine inner experience: Implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 148-159.
İmamoğlu, V. (1986). Assessing the Spaciousness of Interiors. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 7(2), 127-142.
Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Janzen, G. (2008). The Reflexive Na ture of Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jumsai na Ayudhya, T. (2015). Architectural experience in the everyday context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Kean, M.E. (2016). The Emergent Method: A Modern Science Approach to the Phenomenology and Ethics of Emergentism. Michael E. Kean. Kujala, S., Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., &
Crisan, M. (2014). Sentence completion for understanding users and evaluating user experience. Interacting with Computers, 26(3), 238-255. Kusumowidagdo, A., Sachari, A., &
Widodo, P. (2016). Visitors’ perceptions on the important factors of atrium design in shopping centers: A study of Gandaria City Mall and Ciputra World in Indonesia. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(1), 52-62.
Landa, P. (2019). Guía de arquitectura de Monterrey (Monterrey architecture guide). Mexico City: Arquine.
Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Malnar, J.M., & Vodvarka, F. (2004). Sensory Design. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A Research Approach to Inves tigating Different Understandings of Reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49.
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
Maurel, M. (2009). The Explicitation Interview: Examples and Applications. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10– 12), 58-89.
Moorapun, C., & Bunyarittikit, S. (2018). The Role of Interior Design Elements on Affective Response in Thai Religious Buildings. Conference Proceedings, International Conference on Education, Psychology and Society, ICEPS 2018, Tokyo, Japan, 298-306.
Moran, D. (2011). Edmund Husserl: The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nasar, J.L. (1987). Environmental correlates of evaluative appraisals of central business district scenes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 117-130.
Negami, H. (2016). Awe-Inducing Interior Space: Architectural Causes and Cognitive Effects (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Waterloo, Canada.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
Pallasmaa, J. (1994). An Architecture of the Seven Senses. In S. Holl, J. Pallasmaa, & A. Pérez-Gómez, Questions of perception: phenomenology of architec ture (pp. 27-37). Tokyo: A+U Publishing.
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley.
Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229-269.
Pollio, H.R., Henley, T.B., & Thomp son, C.J. (1997). The Phenomenology of Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J.A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 34-46). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Rapoport, A. (1990). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Tucson: The University Of Arizona Press.
Rasmussen, S.E. (1959). Experiencing Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
Rice, S. (2008). Sketching to learn, learning to sketch: students’ ways of sketching in architectural designing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney, Australia. Russell, J.A., Ward, L.M., & Pratt,
G. (1981). Affective Quality Attribut ed to Environments: A Factor Analyt ic Study. Environment and Behavior, 13(3), 259-288.
Seamon, D., & Gill, H.K. (2016). Qualitative Approaches to Environment–Behavior Research: Understanding Environmental and Place Experiences, Meanings, and Actions. In R. Gifford (Ed.), Research Methods for Environmental Psychology (pp. 115-135). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2004). Two Phenomenological Studies of Place. In E. O’Neill, P., Palanque, & P., Johnson (Eds.), People and Computers XVII - Designing for Society, Proceedings of HCI 2003 (pp. 21-35). London: Springer.
Tweed, C. (2000, July). A phenomenological framework for describing architectural experience (Paper presentation). Phenomenology and Culture conference, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Alba ny, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press