Public policy system of the construction industry of a country will reflect the country’s economic, political, social, and cultural status. In any country, especially in developing countries like Sri Lanka, the success of government policies depends on their effective implementation. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how construction related government policies could be effectively implemented to facilitate the development of the construction industry of Sri Lanka. The study used the qualitative approach consisting of 15 expert interviews and manual content analysis was used to analyze the empirical data collected through the interviews. The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka. NPC, which contains 18 policies applicable to both public and private sectors, is found to be sufficient for the effective operation of the construction industry for the time being. However, the proper implementation of the policy could be a challenge given the nature of the country’sconstruction industry. The implementation of the policies gets interrupted when there are financial issues, insufficient human and technical resources, political influence, poor delegation of authority, and ineffective leadership. If therecommendations made in the study to overcome the barriers for policy implementation could be implemented, the country’s construction industry would develop rapidly. "> [PDF] Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka | [PDF] Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka Public policy system of the construction industry of a country will reflect the country’s economic, political, social, and cultural status. In any country, especially in developing countries like Sri Lanka, the success of government policies depends on their effective implementation. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how construction related government policies could be effectively implemented to facilitate the development of the construction industry of Sri Lanka. The study used the qualitative approach consisting of 15 expert interviews and manual content analysis was used to analyze the empirical data collected through the interviews. The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka. NPC, which contains 18 policies applicable to both public and private sectors, is found to be sufficient for the effective operation of the construction industry for the time being. However, the proper implementation of the policy could be a challenge given the nature of the country’sconstruction industry. The implementation of the policies gets interrupted when there are financial issues, insufficient human and technical resources, political influence, poor delegation of authority, and ineffective leadership. If therecommendations made in the study to overcome the barriers for policy implementation could be implemented, the country’s construction industry would develop rapidly. ">

Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka

Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka

Public policy system of the construction industry of a country will reflect the country’s economic, political, social, and cultural status. In any country, especially in developing countries like Sri Lanka, the success of government policies depends on their effective implementation. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how construction related government policies could be effectively implemented to facilitate the development of the construction industry of Sri Lanka. The study used the qualitative approach consisting of 15 expert interviews and manual content analysis was used to analyze the empirical data collected through the interviews. The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka. NPC, which contains 18 policies applicable to both public and private sectors, is found to be sufficient for the effective operation of the construction industry for the time being. However, the proper implementation of the policy could be a challenge given the nature of the country’sconstruction industry. The implementation of the policies gets interrupted when there are financial issues, insufficient human and technical resources, political influence, poor delegation of authority, and ineffective leadership. If therecommendations made in the study to overcome the barriers for policy implementation could be implemented, the country’s construction industry would develop rapidly.

___

  • Adeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., & Kamaruddeen, A. M. (2017). Organizational internal factors and construction risk management among Nigerian construction companies. Global Business Review, 19(4), 921–938. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0972150916677460
  • Adnan, H., Hashim, N., Yusuwan, N. M., & Ahmad, N. (2012). Ethical issues in the construction industry : Contractor’s perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.142
  • Alaghbari, W., Al-Sakkaf, A. A., & Sultan, B. (2019). Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Yemen. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(1), 79–91. https://doi. org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1382091
  • Anderson, J. E. (2010). Public policy making - An introduction (7th ed.). Wadsworth.
  • Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi. org/10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035
  • Bardach, E. (1977). The implementa tion game. University of Chicago Press.
  • Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bertaux, D. (1981). From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 29–45). SAGE Publications.
  • Bosch, G., & Philips, P. (2003). Building chaos : An international comparison of deregulation in the construc tion industry (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Bourdeau, L. (1999). Sustainable development and the future of construction: A comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research & Information, 27(6), 354–366. https:// doi.org/10.1080/096132199369183
  • Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2004). Australian policy handbook. NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. L. (2002). Managing policy reform. Ku marian Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Drewer, S. (1980). Construction and development: A new perspective. Habitat International, 5(3), 395– 428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197- 3975(80)90028-4
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https:// doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  • Fox, W., Bayat, S., & Ferriera, N. (2006). Introduction. In W. Fox, S. Bayat, & N. Ferriera (Eds.), A guide to managing public policy (pp. ix-xi). Juta & Co.
  • Fox, W., & Meyer, I. H. (1995). Public administration dictionary. Juta and Company Limited.
  • Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T. H., & McAlpine, C. (2019). Power, politics, and policy in the appropriation of urban wetlands : The critical case of Sri Lanka. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(4), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.108 0/03066150.2017.1393801
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi. org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org /10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378
  • Hui, W. S., Othman, R., Omar, N. H., Rahman, R. A., & Haron, N. H. (2011). Procurement issues in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(6), 567–593. https://doi. org/10.1108/09513551111163666
  • Hutahaean, M. (2016). The importance of stakeholders’ approach in public policy making. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ethics in Governance (ICONEG 2016), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.2991/ iconeg-16.2017.104
  • Information Resources Management Association. (2018). BIM based design management of a building project. In Architecture and design: Break throughs in research and practice (pp. 903–927). IGI Global.
  • Jayalath, A., & Gunawardhana, T. (2017). Towards sustainable constructions: Trends in Sri Lankan construction industry. International Conference on Real Estate Management and Valuation 2017, 137–143. https://doi. org/10.1354/vp.08-VP-0277-M-FL
  • Jayalath, C., & Perera, B. A. K. S. (2019). Policy gaps that deter fostering sustainable construction in Sri Lanka. In Y. G. Sandanayake, S. Gunatilake, & A. Waidyasekara (Eds.), World Construction Symposium (pp. 484–492). https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2019.48
  • Khan, A. R. (2016). Policy implementation: Some aspects and is sues. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 25(3), 3–12. https://doi. org/10.2307/975319
  • Ling, Y. Y., & Hoang, V. T. P. (2010). Political, economic, and legal risks faced in international projects: Case study of Vietnam. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(3), 156–164. https://doi. org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943
  • Ling, Y. Y., & Hoi, L. (2006). Risk faced by Singaporean firms when undertaking construction projects in India. International Journal of Project Management, 24(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.003
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Mackay, M., & Shaxton, L. (2005). Understanding and applying basic public policy concepts (Issue 3). https:// s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44897869/understandingandapplyingbasicpublicpolicyconcepts. pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DUnderstand ing_and_Applying_Basic_Public.pdf&X-Amz-Algo
  • Makinde, T. (2005). Problems of policy implementation in developing nations: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 63–69. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2005.11892 495
  • Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). https://doi. org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428
  • Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. University Press of America.
  • Meacham, B. J. (2016). Sustainability and resiliency objectives in performance building regulations. Building Research & Information, 44(5–6), 474– 489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218. 2016.1142330
  • Meier, K. J., Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (2016). Policy implementation: Some aspects and issues. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 16(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/975319
  • Merriam, S. B. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (S. G. Robin (ed.)). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Adminis tration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https:// doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
  • Ministry of Housing Construction & Culture Affairs. (2017). National construction policy.
  • Mohd Nawi, M. N., Baluch, N., & Bahauddin, A. Y. (2014). Impact of fragmentation issue in construction industry: An overview. MATEC Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/ matecconf/20141501009
  • Moran, M., Rein, M., & Goodin, R. E. (2008). The origins of policy. In The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0010
  • Morestin, F. (2012). A framework for analyzing public policies: Practical guide. National Collaborating Center for Healthy Policy, 13, 15–36. http:// www.ncchpp.ca/docs/guide_framework_analyzing_policies_en.pdf
  • Nascimento, L. de C. N., Souza, T. V. de, Oliveira, I. C. dos S., Moraes, J. R. M. M. de, Aguiar, R. C. B. de, & Silva, L. F. da. (2018). Theoretical saturation in qualitative research: an experience report in interview with schoolchildren. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71(1), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034- 7167-2016-0616
  • National Advisory Council on Construction. (2016). National policy on construction.
  • Nawi, M. N. M., Angela, L., Kamar, K. A. M., & Hamid, Z. A. (2012). Critical success factors for improving team integration in industrialised building system (IBS) construction projects: The Malaysian case. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 10(1), 44–62. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/272623992_Critical_success_factors_for_improving_team_integration_in_Industrialised_Building_ System_IBS_construction_projects_ The_Malaysian_case
  • Nifa, F. A. A., & Ahmed, V. (2010). Effective partnering in construction – A critical literature review. 4th International Conference On Built Environment In Developing Countries (ICBEDC). http://repo.uum.edu.my/11612/
  • OECD. (2016). Better policies for sustainable development 2016: A new framework for policy coherence. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264256996-en
  • Ofori, G. (2012). Developing the construction Industry in Ghana : The case for a central agency (Issue March).
  • Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2019). Development of a benchmarking model for BIM implementation in developing countries. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi. org/10.1108/bij-05-2018-0138
  • Park, M., Ingawale-Verma, Y., Kim, W., & Ham, Y. (2011). Construction policymaking: With an example of Singaporean government’s policy to diffuse prefabrication to private sector. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(5), 771–779. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/ s12205-011-1243-4
  • Patanakul, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2014). Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management, 25(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2014.07.003
  • Phulkerd, S., Sacks, G., Vandevijvere, S., Worsley, A., & Lawrence, M. (2017). Barriers and potential facilitators to the implementation of government policies on front-of-pack food labeling and restriction of unhealthy food advertising in Thailand. Food Policy, 71, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodpol.2017.07.014
  • Presley, A., & Meade, L. (2010). Benchmarking for sustainability: An application to the sustainable construction industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 435–451. https://doi. org/10.1108/14635771011049380
  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavasky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
  • Ratnasingham, A. (2015, August 19). Sri Lanka’s construction industry lacks proper policy. Lanka Business Online. http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/sri-lankas-construction-in dustry-lacks-proper-policy-official/
  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2014). Analysis in practice. In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (pp. 295–343). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Re search Review, 35(3/4), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061007
  • Seaden, G., & Manseau, A. (2001). Public policy and construction innovation. Building Research and Information, 29(3), 182–196. https://doi. org/10.1080/09613210010027701
  • Sharpe, M. E., Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Shen, L. Y., Wu, W. C., & Ng, S. K. (2001). Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1), 76–81. https://it.szu.edu.cn/__lo cal/9/7E/5B/7D43D38356BB81A0C 55C66E94AD_4A9E7ED0_1A12B.pdf
  • Silva, N. De, Rajakaruna, R. W. D. W. C. A. B., & Bandara, K. A. T. N. (2008). Challenges faced by the construction industry in Sri Lanka: Perspective of clients and contractors. Proceedings of International Conference on Building Education and Research, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6728
  • Simon, C. A. (2010). Public policy: Preferences and outcomes (2nd ed.). Pearson Educations.
  • Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2009). The public policy primer. Westview Press.
  • Stewart, J. J., Hedge, D. M., & Lester, J. P. (2008). Public policy: An evolutionary approach (3rd ed.). Thomson Wordsworth.
  • Taofeeq, D. ., Adeleke, A. Q., & Hassan, A. . (2019). The moderating role of government policy on contractors’ risk attitudes in Malaysia construction companies. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 3(6), 1261–1280. http:// sshj.in/index.php/sshj/article/view/398
  • Taofeeq, D. M., Adeleke A. Q., & Hassan A. K. (2019). The moderating role of government policy on contractors’ risk attitudes in Malaysia construction companies. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 3(6), 1261– 1280. http://sshj.in/index.php/sshj/article/view/398
  • Taofeeq, D. M., Adeleke, A. Q., & Lee, C. (2020). The synergy between human factors and risk attitudes of Malaysian contractors: Moderating effect of government policy. Safety Science, 121, 331–347. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.016
  • Vijayaragunathan, S., & Rasanthi, T. (2019). An insight to women in construction for fostering female careers in Sri Lankan construction industry. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 20(3), 168–173. https:// vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=2133&context=jiws
  • Waddell, H. (2008). Sustainable construction and UK legislation and policy. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, August, 127–132. https:// doi.org/10.1680/mpal.2008.161.3.127
  • Wali, M. A. (2010). The dynamics of policy implementation in Nigeria. iUniverse.
  • Weller, P. (1980). The study of public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 39(3–4), 499–507. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1980. tb00474.x
  • Wettasinghe, C. (2015). National policy on construction vital: CCI. Daillymirror. http://www.dailymirror. lk/75569/national-policy-on-construction-vital-cci
  • Wong, N. (2019). Environmental policy change in two transitional societies : A comparative study on an ti-incinerator construction in Guangzhou and Taipei Environmental policy change in two transitional societies : a comparative study on anti-incinerator construction in Gu. Asian Geographer, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1022570 6.2018.1547201
  • Xiaopeng, D., & Pheng, L. S. (2013). Understanding the critical variables affecting the level of political risks in international construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(5), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013- 0354-5
  • Young, S. P. (2013). Evidence based policy making in Canada. Oxford University Pre
A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2564-7474
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: İTÜ Rektörlüğü