Determination of indoor climate requirements of greenhouses in Samsun provinces with-GIS assisted

Bu çalışmada., Samsun il ve ilçelerinde ekonomik olarak seracılık yapılması için iklim parametreleri göz önüne alınarak en uygun yetiştirme periyotları belirlenmiştir. Çalışmadı^ 9 ilçenin iklim verileri kullanılmış, ısıtma, doğal havalandırma, soğutma gerektiren aylar belirlenmiş ve Samsun merkez ilçe ile karşılaştırılmıştur. Samsun il ve ilçelerinin seracılık açısından günlük ortalama sıcaklık değerlerin uzaysal dağılımı Sayısal Yükseklik Modeli (DEM) kullanılarak, ısı gereksinimleri ise Ters Mesafe Ağırlıklı Enterpolasyon Tekniği (IDW) ile belirlenmiştir. Seracılık açısından en avantajlı ilçe merkez ilçe olup bunu, Çarşamba, EJafra, Kolay, Taflan ve Vezirköprü izlerken seracılık açısından diğerlerine göre dezavantajlı Ladik, Havza ve Kavak ilçeleri bulunmuştur

Samsun il ve ilçelerinde seraların iklimsel ihtiyaçlarının coğrafi bilgi sistemleri ile belirlenmesi

In this study, the most suitable growing period was explored in order to continue production economically in greenhouses. Based on the climatic data gathered from 9 different district of Samsun provinces the time periods for cooling, heating and natural ventilation were determined and compared with each other. Spatially distributions of mean daily outside temperature in region of Samsun determined using DEM (Digital Elevaluation Model) and spatial distributions of heating requirements of greenhouses determined using IDW(Inverse Distance Weight), with support of GIS (Geographic Information system). Research results showed that the central district of Samsun had more advantages in aspects of greenhouse production compared to other districts and Çarşamba, Bafra, Kolay, taflan and Vezirköprü followed it. Unlikely Ladik, Havza and Kavak had several disadvantages for production in greenhouses.

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2004. Samsun Meteoroloji Bülteni Raporları, D.M.t Samsun Bölge Müdürlüğü, Samsun.
Aronoff, S., 1989. Geographical Information Systems: A Management Perspective, WDL Publications, Ottowa, 294 p.
ASHRAE.1991. Design for plant facilities: Environmental control for animals and plants. Handbook, HVAC Applications SI Edition.
Ballestra, G., Bertozzi, R., Buscaroli, A., Gherairdi., Vianello, G., 1996. Applicazioni dei sistemi informativi geografici nella valutazione delta modificazioni ambientali e tarritoriali. Franco Angeli, Milano, Italy.
Baudoin, W.O (co-ord); Denis, I.e., Grafidellis, M., Jimenez R., La Malfa, G., Matinez-Garcia, P.F., Monteiro, A.,Nisen, A., Verlodt, H., de Villele, O., von Zabeltitz, Chr.,1990. Protected cultivation in the Mediterranean Climate. FAO Plant productin, paper 90, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Baytorun, N., Abak, K., Üstün, S., İkiz, ö., 1996 GAP alanında sera tarımı potansiyeli sahil bölgeleri ile karşılaştırılması. GAP 1. Sebze Tarımı sempozyumu. 7-10 Mayıs 1996, Şanlıurfa.
Burrough, P.A., 1990. Principles of Geographical Information System for Land Resources Assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Daly, C, 2002. Climate Division Normals Derived from Topographically-Sensitive Climate Grids. Proceedings, 13 th AMS Conf. On Applied Climatology, Amer. Meteorological Soc., Portland, OR, May 13-16,2002,177-180.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A., 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2™1 Ed., John Willey and Sons Ltd., Singapore.
Greene, S.L., Hart, T.C., Afonin, A., 1999. Using Geographic Information to Acquire Wild Crop Germplasm for Ex Situ Collections: I. Map Development and Field Use. Crop Science. 39 (836-842).
Hartkamp, DA, White, J.W., Hoogenboom, G., 1999. Interfacing Geographic Information Systems with Agronomic Modeling: A Review. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 91.
Krug, H., 1991. Gemueseproduktion (Vegetable production) Parey, Berlin, Hamburg, Germany.
Mueksch, M.C., 1996, Monitoring and Assessing Natural Lake and Environments for Lake-GIS. In: Proc. GIS/L1S'96, Annual Conf. and Exposition, Denver, Colorado, pp. 30-36.
Narrain, P. and Koroluk, R., 1999. Land Use Classification for Agri-environmental Statistic/Indicators, Statistical Commission and Economic Comission for Europe, Conference of Europan Statisticians, Working Paper No: 13, Israel.
Peter G„ Jones, P.G., Thornton, P.K., 2000. MarkSim: Software to Generate Daily Weather Data for Latin America and Africa. Agnmomy Journal, Vol. 92.
Phillips, D.L., Dolph, J., Marks, D., I992. A Comparison of Geostatistical Procedures for Spatial Analysis of Precipitation in Mountainous Terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 58 (1-2). 119-141.
SAS Institute Inc., 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. Ver. 8.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Silva, A.C., Blanco, J.L., 2003. Evaluating Biophysical Variables to Identify Suitable Areas for Oat Central Mexico: A Multi-criteria and GIS Aproach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. Volume: 95. pp. 371-377.
Sirjacobs M., 1989. Greenhouses in Egypt, protected cultivation in the Mediterranean climate. FAO, Rome, Italy.
USDA. 1998. PRISM Climate Mapping Project-Precipitation. Mean monthly and annual precipitation digital files for the continental U.S. USDA-NRCS National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Ft. Worth TX. December, CD-ROM.
Verlodt, H., 1990. Greenhouses in Cyprus, protected cultivation in the Mediterranean climate. FAO, Rome, Italy.
von Eisner, B., Briassoulis, D., Waaijenberg, D., Mistriotis, A., von Zabeltitz ,Chr., Gratraud, J., Russo, G., Suay-Cortes, R., 2000. .Review of structural and functional characteristics of greenhouses in European Union countries, part I: design requirements. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 75(1), 1-16.
Yazdanpanah, H., 2001. Agroclimatic Zoning of Azarbaijan Province for Rainfed Almond, MSc. Thesis, Tehran University, Iran.
Yomralıoğlu, T., 2000. Geographical Information Systems. Academi Presses, Trabzon, 480 s.