Türkiye'de Kamu Yönetimi Başarısızlığına Teorik Bir Yaklaşım

Kamu" yönetimi başarısızlığı son zamanlarda ele alınmaya başlanılan bir konudur. Bu alanla ilgili yazılmış yapıt veya yapılmış alan araştırma sayısı yok denecek kadar azdır. Sayısı az olan mevcut literatür ise daha çok gelişmiş ülkelerin kamu yönetimi başarısızlıklarını piyasa ekonomisi başarısızlığı paralelinde ekonomik bir bakış açısıyla tartışmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım istikrarlı ve düzenli siyasal, sosyal, ekonomik ve idari yapılara sahip gelişmiş ülkeler için geçerli olabilir. Ancak Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerde bu konuyla ilgili bakış açısının daha geniş tutulması gerekmektedir. Çünkü siyasal, sosyal, ekonomik ve idari yapılardaki sorunların kamu yönetiminin çalışmasında ve hizmet sunmasında başarısız olmasında önemli rol oynadığı düşünülmelidir. İşte bu çalışmada yapılan Türkiye'de niçin kamu kuruluşları ve kamu politikalarının genelde niçin başarısız olduklarını anlamak için bu geniş bakış açısıyla konunun tartışılması ve ele alınmasıdır.

A Theoretical Approach to Government Failure in Turkey

Government failure is a recent subject in public administration, being discussed by only a few writers for mostly developed countries. However, it is possible to say that there is no such literature for the case in Turkey. Even the present literature discussing government failure uses the notion of market failure to explain public sector failure. This may be probably accepted for the developed countries, which relatively, have stable political, social, economic and administrative managements. However, for developing countries like Turkey there is a need for a wider perspective, which takes into account political, social, economic and administrative systems to explore and explain government failure because in many developing countries the political systems are unstable, and there are severe economic problems. Thus, there seems to be a need for developing a wider approach to the issue. In this study, this is done to find out why the public administration usually (or always) fails to provide proper public policy implementation and public services.

PDF

___

AHMAD, F. (1993), The Making of Modern Turkey (London: Routledge).
AKURAL, S.M. (1984), "Kemalist Views on Social Change," LANDAU, J.M. (Ed.), Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Pres).
BIANCHI, R. (1984), Interest Croups and Political Development in Turkey (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
BOZKURT, 0. (1980), Memurlar: Türkiye'de Kamu Bürokrasisinin Sosyolojik Görünümü (Ankara: TODAİE).
ÇEVİK, H.H. (2000), A Public Policy Failure Analysis: The Case of Mass Housing Policy in Turkey 1984-1994 (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi) (England: Nottingham University).
ÇEVİK, H.H. (2002), "Kamu Yönetimi Başarısızlık Teorisi ve Eleştirisi," Amme idaresi Dergisi, 35/3.
DPT (1996), Temel Ekonomik Gösterseler (Ankara).
DPT (1997), Ekonomik ve Sosyal .Gösterseler (1950 - 1997) (Ankara).
DUNLEAVY, P (1995), "Policy Disasters:Explaining the UK's Record," Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 10, No.2 (Summer): 53-70
DYSON, K.H.F. (1980), The state tradition in western Europe: Study of an idea and institution (Oxford: Martin Robertson).
ERGÜDEN, S. (1982), "An Overview of the Housing Sector in Turkey," the 18th Congress of International Society of City and Regional Planners (İstanbul: 1-7 September).
ERYILMAZ, B. (1992), Tanzimat ve Yönetimde Modernleşme (istanbul: İşaret).
ERYILMAZ, B. (1995) Kamu Yönetimi (İzmir: Akademi Yayınevi).
FINDLEY, C.V. (1980), The bureaucratic reform in the Ottoman empire: The sublime porte, 1789-1922 (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Pres).
GRAY, P. (1996), "Disastrous Explanations- or Explanations of Disaster? A Reply to Patrick Dunleavy," Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 11, No.1 (Spring): 74-82.
HALE, W. (1976), Modern Turkish Politics: Historical Introduction," HALE, W. (Ed.), Aspects of Modern Turkey (London: Bowker).
HEPER, M. (1976), "Political Modernisation as reflected in bureaucratic change: the Turkish bureaucracy and a historical empire tradition," International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 7: 507-521.
HEPER, M. (1977), "Negative buraucratic politics in a modernising context: the Turkish case, "Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 1: 65-84.
HEPER, M. (1978), Gecekondu Policy in Turkey (Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications).
HEPER, M. (1984), "Bureaucrats, Politicians and Officers in Turkey: Dilemmas of a New Political Paradigm," EVİN, Ahmet (Ed.), Modern Turkey: Continuity and Change (Ogladen: Leske Verlag a Budrich GmbH.).
HEPER, M. (1985), The State Tradition in Turkey (Walkington, England: Eothen Press).
HEPER, M. (1987), "State, Democracy, and Bureaucracy in Turkey," HEPER, Metin (Ed.), the State and Public Bureaucracies: A Comparative Perspective (New York: Greenwood Press).
HEPER, M. (1990), "The State and debureaucratisation: the case of Turkey," International Social Science Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4: 605-615.
HEPER, M. (1992), "The Strong State as a Problem for the Consolidation of Democracy: Turkey and Germany Compared," Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, July 1992: 169-194.
HILL, M. (1997), The Policy Process in the Modern State (London: Prentice Hall).
HILL, M. (Ed.) (1997a), The Policy Process - A Reader (Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall / Harvester Wheatsheaf).
HOGWOOD, B. W. / GUNN, L.A. (1984), Policy Analysis for the Real World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
İNALCIK, H. (1964), "The Nature of traditional society," WARD, R.E. / RUSTOW, D.A. (Eds.), Political Modernisation in Japan and Turkey (Princeton: Princeton Univercity Press).
ISO (2002), Türkiye Ekonomisi, Yayın No: 2002-3.
KELEŞ, R. (1984), Kentleşme ve Konut Politikası (Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Basımevi).
KEY, V.O. (1964), Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups (New York: Crowell).
MANGO, A. (1977), "The State of Turkey," Middle Eastern Studies, 13: 261-273.
MARDİN, Ş. (1992), Türkiyede Siyaset ve Toplum (İstanbul). Maliye Bakanlığı (2003), Yıllık Ekonomik Rapor (Ankara).
MCLEAN, I. (1987), Public Choice: An Introduction (Oxford: Basic Blackwell).
MCLENNAN, G. (1989), Marxism, Pluralism and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity Press).
MINOGUE, M. (1983), "Theory and Practice in Public Policy and Administration," Policy and Politics, 11: 63-85.
MUELLER, D. C. (1989), Public Choice II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
ÖZEN, Ş. (1996), Bürokratik Kültür (Ankara: TODAİE).
ROOS, N.P. / ROOS, L.L. (1968), "Changing Patterns of Turkish Public Administration," Middle Eastern Studies , 4(3): 270-295.
ROSE, G. (1982), Deciphering Sociological Research (London: The Macmilan Press Ltd.).
TURAN, I. (1984), "Continuity and Change in Turkish Bureacracy:the Kemalist Period and After," LANDAU, J.M. (Ed.), Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press).
WEIMER, D.L. / VINNING, A.R. (1992), Po//cy Analysis (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall).
WOLF, C. JR. (1979), "A Theory of Non-Market Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis," 'Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No:1 (April): 107-139.
WOLF, JR. C. (1988), Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives (Cambridge: -MIT Press).
WOOD, B. (1990), "Policy Failure: The Non-Reform of American Health Care" Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 5, No.3 (Winter): 19-36.
www.maliye.gov.tr