Duygusal Olaylar Teorisi Çerçevesinde Pozitif ve Negatif Duygusallığın Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet Üzerindeki Etkilerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Bu çalışmada, Duygusal Olaylar Teorisi çerçevesinde duyguların algılanan örgütsel adalet üzerindeki etkileri ele alınmıştır. Bir modele dayalı olarak geliştirilen hipotezler çerçevesinde, Kayseri Organize Sanayi Bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren 14 işletmeden 589 kişilik bir örneklemden elde edilen verilerin değerlendirilmesi sonucunda, pozitif duygusallığın dağıtım adaleti (R=Ü.3Ü6, R2=ü.()93), işlem adaleti (R=0.385, R2=0.148) ve kişiler arası etkileşim adaleti (R=0.526, R2=0.276) üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Benzer şekilde negatif duygusallığın da dağıtım adaleti (R=-0.574, R2=0.329), işlem adaleti (R=-0.440, R2=0.194) ve kişiler arası etkileşim adaleli (R=-0.417, R2=0.174) üzerinde negatif etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, negatif duygusallığın algılanan örgütsel adalet üzerinde pozitif duygusallıktan daha etkili olduğu görülmüştür.

A Research Aimed tor Determine the Effects of Posittive and Negative Affectivity on Perceived Organizational Justice in the Scope of Affective Events Theory

In this study, the effects of affectivity on perceived organizational justice in the scope of Affective Events Theory has been analized. Data has been collected from 589 workers and 14 firms operating in Kayseri Organized Industrial Zone and evaluated in the framework of the hypotheses developed on a model. It has been found that positive aj'fectivity has positive effects on the perceived distributive justice (R=0.306, R2=().()93), procedural justice (R=0.385, R2=0.148) and interactional justice (R=0.526, R2=0.276). Similarly, negative affectivity has negative effects on the perceived distributive justice (R=0.574, R2=0.329), procedural justice (R=0.440. R2=0.194) and interactional justice (R=0.417, R:=0.174). Besides, the negative affectivity is more effective than positive affectiviiy on perceived organizational justice. These results show that affectivity influences the human's organizational perceptions.

___

  • ASHFORTH, Blake E. / HUMPHREY, Ronald H. (1995), "Emotion in the Workplace: Â Reappraisal," Human Relations, Vol. 48: 97-125.
  • BAGDADLI, Silvia / PAOLETTI, Francesco (2000), "The Importance of Organizational Justice in Promotion Decisions," Best Paper Proceedings (Toronto).
  • BARLING, Julian / MICHELLE, P. (1993), "Interactional, Formal, and Distributive Justice in the Workplace: An Exploratory Study," The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 127, No. 6: 649-656.
  • BRINER, Rob B. (1999), "The Neglect and Importance of Emotion at Work," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 8: 323-46.
  • BYRNE, Zinta / RUPP, Deborah E. / EURICH, Tasha (2003), "Effects of Emotions on Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice," Poster at 18th Annual Conference of the society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April 11-13.
  • CROPANZANO, Russell / FOLGER, Robert (1991), "Procedural Justice and Worker Motivation," STEERS, R. / PORTER, L. (Eds.), Motivation and Work Behavior (New York: McGraw-Hill): 131-143.
  • CROPANZANO, Russell / PREHAR, Cynthia A. / CHEN, Peter Y. (2002), "Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice," Group and Organizational Management, Vol. 27: 324-351.
  • CROPANZANO, Russell / WEiSS, Howard M. / HALE, Jeff M.S. / REB, Jochen (2003), "The Structure of Affect: Reconsidering the Relationship Between Negative and Positive Af f activity," Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 6: 831-857.
  • FISHER, Cynthia D. / ASHKANASY, Neal M. (2000), "The emerging role of Emotions in Work Life: An Introduction," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21: 123-29.
  • FOLGER, Robert / KONOVSKY, Mary A. (1989), "Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32: 115-130.
  • FORGAS, Joseph P. (1992), "Affect in Social Judgments and Decisions: A Multiprocess Model," Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25: 227-275.
  • FRIJDA, Nico H. (1994), "Varieties of Affect: Emotions and Episodes, Moods, and Sentiments," EKMAN, P. / DAVİDSON, R.J.(Eds.), The Nature of Emotion (New York: Oxford University Press): 59-67.
  • GREENBERG, Jerald (1996), The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
  • GREENBERG, Jerald (2002), Managing Behavior in Organizations (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 3rd ed.).
  • LAZARUS, Richard S. (1991), Emotional and Adaptation (New York: Oxford Press).
  • LEVENTHAL, Gerald S. (1980), "What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the . study of fairness in social relationships," GERGEN, K.J. / GREENBERG, M.S. / WILLIS, R.H; (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (New York: Plenum):27-55.
  • LUTHANS, Fred (1981), Organizational Behavior (McGraw Hill, 3.ed.).
  • MASTERSON, Suzanne S. / LEWIS-MCCLEAR, Kyle / GOLDMAN, Barry M. / TAYLOR, Susan M. (2000), "Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43: 738-748.
  • MOORMAN, Robert H. (1991), "Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76: 845-855.
  • ÖZKALP, Enver / CENGİZ, Ayşe A. (2003), "Çalışma Hayatında Duygular ve Yönetimi," 11.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Afyon: 943-956.
  • PRICE, James L. / MUELLER, Charles W. (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement (Marshfield, MA: Pittman).
  • SHAPIRO, Debra L. / BUHNER, Holly Elizabeth / BARRY, Bruce (1994), "Explanations for Rejection Decisions: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy and Moderate Their Enhancement of Justice Perceptions," Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process, Vol. 58: 346-68
  • SWEENEY, Paul D. / MCFARLIN, Dean B. (1993), "Workers' Evaluations of the "Ends" and the "Means": An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural Justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 55: 23-40.
  • THIBAUT, John W. / WALKER, Laurens (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).
  • WATSON, David / TELLEGEN, Auke (1985), "Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood," Psychological Bulletin, Vol 98: 219-235.
  • WATSON, David (2000), Mood and Temperament (NewYork, NY: Guilford Press).
  • WATSON, D. / CLARK, Lee A., / TELLEGEN, Auke (1988), "Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54: 1063-1070.
  • WEISS, Howard M. / CROPANZANO, Russell (1996), "Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work," Research in Organisational Behavior, Vol.18:1-79.