Spatial Development and ITT Policies as Cohesion Means in the EU and Turkey

Zamanla politik, coğrafik, ekonomik ve sosyal boyutlarıyla giderek daha kompleks bir birlik haline gelen AB, yeni üyelerin kabulüyle birlikte artan yeni bir mekansal sosyoekonomik kısıtlamalar dilemmasıyla yüz yüze kaldı. Gelirin mekansal dağılımındaki farklılıkların, yoksul bölgelerden göreceli daha zengin bölgelere istenmeyen yeni göçlere yol açabilme ve ekonomik aktivitelerin yer seçimlerini etkileyebilme potansiyeli nedeniyle, bölgesel gelir farklılıkları bütünleşme ve uyumlaşma süreçlerinin başarıya ulaşmasını kısıtlayan bir engel olarak algılandı. Çünkü sonuçta bu faktörler, AB üyesi ülke ve bölgeleri arasında tansiyon ve çelişkiler yaratarak birliğin politik varlığını da tehdit edebilirlerdi. AB, mekansal gelişme ve BİT politikalarının sosyoekonomik bütünleşmesini sağlamak ve küresel ekonomide rekabet edebilme kapasitesini etkili bir şekilde artırmak için kentsel ve bölgesel gelişme çabalarının hayati bir parçası olarak görmektedir. Bu makalede, AB ve Türkiye'nin kentsel ve bölgesel kalkınmadaki mekansal gelişme ve BİT politikaları karşılaştırılmaktadır.

AB ve Türkiye'de Bütünleşmenin Bir Aracı Olarak Mekansal Gelişme ve BİT Politikaları

As the EU has gradually evolved into a politically, geographically, economically and socially more complex unity, it has increasingly faced with the dilemma of spatial socioeconomic constraints produced by the added new member states. Regional differences in socioeconomic development was perceived as a barrier to further cohesion and integration processes, for spatial variation in income could result in undesirable population movements from the poor to rich regions and relocation of economic activities that in turn might thread to political viability of the EU through political tensions between regions. Hence, the union has viewed the development of spatial and ITT policies as a vital component of its urban and regional development efforts in order to effectively achieve the socioeconomic cohesion and capability to compete in an increasingly global market. Contrary to the EU, Turkey has long neglected to develop a region-based national policy with specific goals and objectives in the area of spatial development and ITT. This paper compares EU and Turkey's spatial development and ITT policies in urban and regional development.

___

  • AKTT (1999), Gündem 2000: Genişleme-1999 Yılı Aday Ülkeler İlerleme Raporları, Avrupa Komisyonu Türkiye Temsilciliği (Avrupa Komisyonu).
  • AKTT, (2000), 2000 Yılı Genişleme Stratejisi, Avrupa Komsiyonu Türkiye Temsilciliği (Avrupa Komisyonu).
  • ANGELL, lan (1995), "Winners and Losers in the Information Age," LSE Magazine: 10-12.
  • BECKMANN, Martin J. (1999), Lectures on Location Theory (Berlin: Springer).
  • BOARNET, Marlon G/MEDDA, Francesca (2003), "An Analysis of the Transportation and Land Use Links," the Paper Presented at Second Meeting of STELLA (Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisions with America) Focus Group 3, (Washington, USA).
  • BORJA, Jordi/CASTELLS, Manuel (1997), Local and Global: Management of of Cities in the Information Age (London: Earthscan Publication Ltd).
  • BOYCE, Ronal Reed (1974), The Bases of Economic Geography (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.).
  • BOZKURT, Veysel (2000), Enformasyon Toplumu ve Türkiye (Ankara: Sistem Yayıncılık, 3. Baskı).
  • CAMAGNI, Roberto (2003), "Regional Clusters, Regional Competencies and Regional Competition," Paper Presented at the International Conference on Cluster Management in Structural Policy-International Experiences and Consequences for Northrhine-Westfalia (Duisburg).
  • CAMAGNI, Roberto (1991), "Local 'Milieu1, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Toward a New Dynamic Theory of Economic Space," CAMAGNI, Roberto (ed.), Innovation Networks (London: Belhaven Press).
  • CAPORASO, J. A. (1996), "The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern," Journal of Common Market Studies, 34/1: 29-52.
  • CAPPELIN, Ricardo (1991), "International Networks of Cities," Roberto Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives (London: Belhaven Press).
  • CASTELLS, Manuel / HALL, Peter (1997), "Technopoles: Mines and Foundries of the Informational Economy," LEGATES, Richard T.I STOUT, Fredric (eds.), The City Reader, (London: Routledge):
  • CASTELLS, Manuel (1977), Urban Question (London: Arnold).
  • CEC (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • CEC (1991), Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community's Territory, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • CEC (1994), Europe 2000+: Co-operation for European Territorial Development, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • CEMAT (2000), The Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent, European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning (Hanover: Council of Europe).
  • CHRISTALLER, Walter (1966), Central Places in Southern Germany (Prentice Hall) (Translation: Charlisle W. Baskin).
  • CRAFTS, Nicolas/ VENABLES Anthony J. (2001), "Globalization in History: a Geographic Perspective, [Access 02/06/2004], http://www.proses.sciences-po.fr/documents/ Crafts_Venables_Globalisation_History.pdf.
  • CSD (1999), European Spatial Development Perspective -Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Commission on Spatial Development (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • DUPUY, Alex (1998),' "Thoughts on Globalization, Marxism and the Left," Latin American Perspectives, November 25 : 55-60.
  • DPT (2000), Uzun Vadeli Strateji ve Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı 2001-2005 (Ankara) [Access: 19/08/2004],http://www.dpt.gov.tr.
  • EC (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies 28), European Commission (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • EC (1999), ESDP European Spatial Development Perspective, European Commission, (Luxembourg) [Access: 02/06/2004], http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional poliicy/sources/ docoff ic/off icial/ reports/som_en. htm
  • ERKUT, Gülden/ BAYPINAR, Mete Başar (2003), "EU Integration and the Change of Spatial Organization in Turkey," the Paper Presented at The 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (Jyvaskyla, Finland).
  • ERKUT, Gülen et al. (2001), "Avrupa Birliği'ne Geçiş Sürecinde Bölge Planlama Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası ve OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü): 111-125.
  • ESPON (2004), What is Spatial Planning?, European Spatial Planning Observatory Network [Access: 02/12/2004], http://www.espon.org.uk/spatialplanning.htm.
  • ESPON (2002), Enlargement of the European Union and the Wider European Perspective as Regards its Polycenthc Spatial Structure, Tender to the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON): Action 1.1.3., European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (Seweden).
  • ESPON (2002b), Action 1.1.3: Enlargement of the European Union and the Wider European Perspective as Regards its Polycentric Spatial Structure, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (Sweden).
  • FALUDI, Andreas (2001), "Introduction: The European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP)," Paper Presented at American Planning Association 2001 National Planning Conference (New Orleans).
  • FISHMAN, Robert (1998), "Urban Utopias: Ebenezer Howard and Le Corbusier," CAMPELL, Scott/ FAINSTEIN, Susan (Eds.) Readings in Planning Theory (Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers): 19-67.
  • FLANAGAN, William G. (1993), Contemporary Urban Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • GALLIANO, Danielle/ROUX, Pascale (2001), Spatial Externalities, Organization of Firm and its Adoption: the Specificities of French Agro-Food Firms, Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique [Access: 03/07/2004], http://www.toulouse.inra.fr/centre/ esr/ wpRePEc/gal200115.pdf.
  • GEDİKLİ, Bahar (2002) "Spatial Policies within the Framework of European Union and Turkish Planing System Vis-a-Vis these Policies," Paper Presented at the EURA Conference on Urban and Spatial European Policies: Levels of Territorial Government (Turrin, Italy).
  • GERAY, Cevat (1999), "Kırsal Kalkınma Yöneltilen', İlçe Yerel Yönetimi ve 'İlçe Köy Birlikleri' Önerisi," Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 8/2: 11-42.
  • GEZICI, Ferhan/HEWINGS, Geoffrey J. D. (2003), "Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey", Paper Presented at the 4th Congress of European Regional Science (Jvvaskyla, Finland) [Access: 06/07/2004], http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa03/ cdrom/papers/99.pdf.
  • GORDON, Richard (1994), Internationalization, Multinationalization, Globalization: Contradictory World Economics and New Spatial Division of Labor, Working Paper 94 (Santa Cruz, Ca.: University of California Center for the Study of Global Transformations).
  • GUTH, Micheal (2000), "From Technology Policy for Regions to Regional Technology Policy: toward a New Technology Policy in the EU," Paper Presented at The 4th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation (Curitiba).
  • HARVEY, David (1999) Limits to Capital (London: Verso, New Edition).
  • HARVEY, David (1989) Conditions of Postmodemity (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • HARVEY, David (1973) SocialJustice and the City (London: Arnord).
  • ISARD, Walter (1956), Location and Space-Economy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  • JENSEN, Ole B. et al. (1996), "INTERREG IIC - A Loophole for Transnational Planning," Nordrevy, 5/6: 13-19.
  • KATZNELSON, Ira (1993), Marxism and the City (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • KESKİNOK, Çağatay (2001),"Türkiye de Kent Planlamanın Sorunları ve Avrupa Birliği Süreci: Bir Karşıt Görüş," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası and OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü): 129-139.
  • KEYDER, C. / ÖNCÜ, A. (1994), "Globalization of a Third-World Metropolis: Istanbul in the 1980s," Review, 17/3: 383-421.
  • KOMORNICKI, Tomasz (2002) "Impacts of Border Regime Institutions on Transport Network Development in Case of Central and Eastern Europe," Paper Presented at the STELLA Transatlantic Thematic Network Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisons with America, Focus Group 5 Kick-off Meeting (Brussels).
  • LAPPLE, Dieter (2001), "City and Region in the Age of Globalization and Digitization", German Journal of Urban Studies, All [Access: 10/04/2003], http://www.difu.de/index. shtml?/ publikationen/dfk/en/archiv/welcome.shtml.
  • LEFEBVRE, H. (1970), La Revolution Urbaine (Paris: Gallimard).
  • MARIN, Mehmet C. (2004), "Elektronik Küresel Mekanlar, Tele-koloniler ve Türkiye'deki Kentler, " Uludağ Üniversitesi I. Ulusal Genç Bilim Adamları Sempozyumu: Değişen Dünyada Türkiye'nin Önemi (Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Kültür ve Sanat Kurulu Yayınlan, No: 7, Cilt I): 251-275.
  • MARIN, Mehmet C. (2003), "Dijital Kentte Endüstrinin Mekansal Seçimi ve İş İlişkilerine Yerleşim Kuramı Açısından Bir Bakış: Nike Inc. Örneği," //. Ulusal Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (İstnabul: Kocaeli Üniversitesi İİBF ve BETA Basım Yayım Dağıtım AŞ): 735-748.
  • MARIN, Mehmet C./ALTINTAS, Hakan (2003), "The Contribution of the Regional Development Agency (SAPRDA) to Rural Governance in Southeastern Anatolia," Paper Presented at Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, The Third Meeting of the Study Group on Local Governance within the European Group of Public Adminstration (Portugal) [Access: 09/02/2004], http://www.uwe.ac.uk/ bbs/sglg/mehm.doc.
  • METCALFE, Jon (2001) "The European Urban Charter and its Implications for Urban Planning," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası): 139-143.
  • MOSS, Mitchell (1999), Telecommunications Systems and Large World Cities: A Case Study of New York [Access: 18/03/2003] http://www.mitchellmoss.com/ books/worldcity.html.
  • ORAL, Yıldırım/ECEMIŞ, Sibel (2001), "Türkiye de Metropoliten Planlamanın Kurumlaşmasında Avrupa Birliği Sürecinin Olası Etkileri," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası /OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama, (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası and OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü): 157-168.
  • POGGI, G. (1978), The Development of the Modern State: A Sociology Introduction (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
  • RICHARDSON, Tim/JENSEN, Ole B. (2000), "Discourses of Mobility and Polycentric Development: A Contested View of European Spatial Planning," European Planning Studies (Volume 8, No 4): 503-520.
  • SAWERS, Larry (1984), "New Perspectives on Urban Political Economy," TABB, William R. /SAWERS, Larry (eds.), Marixsm and the Metropolis: New Prespectives on Urban Political Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3-17.
  • ŞENGÜL, Tank (2001), Kentsel Çelişki ve Siyaset: Kapitalist Kentleşme Süreçleri Üzerine Yazılar (İstanbul: Demokrasi Kitaplığı).
  • ŞENER, Nedim (2003), "Yok Böyle Yağma," Milliyet, 8 Haziran 2003 [Access: 28/12/2004], http://www.milliyet.com/2003/06/08/ekonomi/aeko.html
  • TEKELİ, İlhan (2001), Modernite Aşılırken Kent Planlaması (Ankara: İmge).
  • TEKELİ, İlhan (1984), "Ekonomik Bunalımın ve Bunalımdan Çıkmak için İzlenen Politikaların Toplumsal Sonuçlan," TEKELİ, İlhan (ed.), Türkiye'de ve Dünya'da Yaşanan Ekonomik Bunalım (Ankara: Yurt Yayınları).
  • TREANOR, Paul (2004), "Spatial Development Principles for the European Continent," [Access: 12/06/2004], http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/europlan.extra.html.
  • UNSAL, Fatma (2001), "Kentsel Planlamada Avrupa Birliği ile Uyumu Kolaylaştıracak Yenilikçi Araçlar," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası and OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası): 145-154.
  • ZIELONKA, Jan (2001), "How New Enlarged Borders Will Reshape the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, 39/3: 507-536.