___

• Yüksel, A. (2010). Okuma güçlüğü çeken bir öğrencinin okuma becerisinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma [A study about improving one’s reading skills who has reading disability]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 3(1), 124-134.
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203-214.
• Winograd, P., & Johnson, P. (1982). Comprehension monitoring and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(1), 61-76.
• Williams, J. P., Brown, L. G., Silverstein, A. K., & de Cani, J. S. (1994). An instructional program in comprehension of narrative themes for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(3), 205-221.
• Williams, J. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 6-18.
• Williams, J. P. (2004). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 293-305). New York: Guilford Press.
• Williams, J. P. (1988). Identifying main ideas: A basic aspect of reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 8(3), 1-13.
• Williams, J. P. (1986). Teaching children to identify the main idea of expository texts. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 163-168.
• Watson, S. M. R., Gable, R. A., Gear, S. B., & Hughes, K. C. (2012). Evidence-based strategies for improving the reading comprehension of secondary students: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(2), 79-89.
• Warren, L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1997). Helping parents to read expository literature to their children: Promoting mainidea and detail understanding. Reading Research and Instruction, 3(4), 341-360.
• van den Broek, P., Lynch, J. S., Naslund, J., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Verduin, K. (2003). The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: Evidence from the selection of titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 707-718.
• Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2007). Content-area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Türk Dil Kurumu. (2005). Türkçe sözlük [Turkish dictionary] (10. baskı). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
• Torgeson, J. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner. Topics in Learning and Language Disabilities, 2(1), 45-52.
• Tompkins, G. E. (2006). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Tomitch, L. M. (2000). Teaching main ideas. Are we really teaching? Linguagem & Ensino, 3(1), 45-53.
• Temur, T. (2003). Okunabilirlik (readability) kavramı [Concept of readability]. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları Türkçenin Öğretimi Özel Sayısı, 13(13), 169-180.
• Tekin-İftar, E., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2015). Özel eğitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri [Errorless teaching methods in special education]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students’ academıc performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 283-308.
• Stevens, R. J., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 8-16.
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
• Spring, C., & Prager, J. (1992). Teaching community-college students to follow the train of thought in expository texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(1), 33-54.
• Snyder, B., & Pressley, M. (1995). Introduction to cognitive strategy instruction. In M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
• Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed what’s it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133-169.
• Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 107-117.
• Roehler, R. L. & Cantlon, D. C. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books, Cambridge.
• Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence‐based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 63-69.
• Reid, R., Lienemann, T. O., & Hagaman, J. L. (2013). Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Rand Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
• Rafoth, M. A., Leal, L., & Defabo, L. (1993). Strategies for learning and remembering: Study skills across the curriculum. Washington DC: National Education Association.
• Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policy makers. New York: Harper-Colli.
• Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
• Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., DeLaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., & Dunston, P. J. (2007). Assessing adolescents' motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 378-396.
• Pilten. G. (2007). Ana fikir bulma stratejisi öğretiminin ana fikir bulma ve okuduğunu anlamaya etkisi [The effect of main idea strategy instruction on finding main idea and reading comprehension] (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Peverly, S. T., & Sumowski. J. F. (2012). What variables predict quality of text notes and are text notes related to performance on different types of tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 104-117.
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 135-150.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• National Reading Panel [NRP]. National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Erişim 22.10.217 https://www1.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2016). İlkokul 4. sınıf Türkçe ders kitabı [Primary School 4th-grade Turkish Textbook]. Ankara: MEB Yayınları Ders Kitapları Dizisi.
• Massey, D., & Heafner, T. (2004). Promoting reading comprehension in social studies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 26-40.
• Mariotti, A. S., & Homan, S. P. (2001). Linking reading assessment to instruction: An application work text for elementary classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and selfmonitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
• Lauterbach, S. L., & Bender, W. M. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for reading comprehension: A success for high school freshmen. High School Journal, 79(1), 58-64.
• Kuşdemir, Y., & Güneş, F. (2014). Doğrudan öğretim modelinin okuduğunu anlama becerilerine etkisi [The effect of direct instruction model on reading comprehension skills]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(32), 86-113.
• Kuhn, M., & Stalh, A. (1998). Teaching children to learn word meanings from context: A synthesis and some questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(1), 119-138.
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3-22.
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
• Kinder, D., Bursuck, B., & Epstein, M. (1992). An evaluation of history textbooks. Journal of Special Education, 25(4), 472-491.
• Kiewra, K. A., & DuBois, N. F. (1998). Learning to learn: Making the transition from student to life-long learner. Prentice Hall. Allyn and Bacon.
• Kiewra, K. A. (1987). Note taking and review: The research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16(3), 233-249.
• Katims, D. S., & Harris, S. (1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle-school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41(2), 116-123.
• Kathleen M. L. (2015). Determining the main idea: Instructional strategies that work. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(3), 138-142.
• Karatay, H., & Okur, S. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının öyküleyici ve bilgilendirici metinleri özetleme becerileri [Prospective teachers’ summarizing skills in narrative and expository texts]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7), 399-420.
• Karatay, H. (2014). Okuma eğitimi: Kuram ve uygulama [Reading education: Theory and practice]. Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayınevi.
• Karataş, T. (2004). Edebiyat terimleri sözlüğü [Dictionary of literary terms]. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
• Just, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences ın working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.
• Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 127-139.
• Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L, Hoppes, M. H., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self‐monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14(4), 379-396.
• Jitendra, A. K., & Gajria, M. (2011). Main idea and summarization instruction to improve reading comprehension. In R. E. O’Connor & P. F. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 198-219). The Guilford Press New York London.
• Jacobowitz, T. (1990). AIM: A metacognitive strategy for constructing the main idea of text. Journal of Reading, 33(8), 620-624.
• Ilter, I. (2017b). Teaching word meanings to students at different reading ability: A controlled assessment of the contextual-based vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension. Education and Science, 42(190), 437463.
• Ilter, I. (2017a). Improving the reading comprehension of primary-school students at frustration-level reading through the paraphrasing strategy training: A multiple-probe design study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 147-161.
• Hennings, D. G. (1991). Essential reading: Targeting, tracking, and thinking about main ideas. Journal of Reading, 34(5), 348-351.
• Halladay, J. L. (2012). Revisiting key assumptions of the reading level framework. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 53-62.
• Hagaman, J. L., Casey, K. J., & Reid, R. (2016). Paraphrasing strategy instruction for struggling readers, preventing school failure. Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(1), 43-52.
• Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(49), 222-234.
• Güneş, F. (2000). Okuma-yazma öğretimi ve beyin teknolojisi [Literacy teaching and brain technology] (2 baskı). Ocak Yayınları.
• Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Reading motivation and engagement in middle and high school. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Engaging adolescents in reading (pp. 1-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Graves, A. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and meta-comprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(2), 90-100.
• Gathercole, S. E., Durling, E., Evans, M., Jeffcock, S., & Stone, S. (2007). Working memory deficits in laboratory analogues of activities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1019-1037.
• Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 517-529.
• Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(6), 508-516.
• Fordham, N. W., Wellman, D., & Sandmann, A. (2002). Taming the text: Engaging and supporting students in social studies readings. Social Studies, 93(4), 149-159.
• Ellis, E. S., Deshler, D. D., Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., & Clark, F. L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1-24.
• Ellis, E. S., & Graves, A. W. (1990). Teaching rural students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10(2), 2-10.
• Duffelmeyer, F. A. & Duffelmeyer, B. B. (1991). Topic and main idea: Clearing up the confusion. The Reading Teacher, 45(3), 252-253.
• Deshler, D. D., & Lenz, B.K. (1989). The strategies instructional approach. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 36(3), 203-224.
• Dayıoğlu, G. (2015). Fadiş [Fadis] (31. Baskı). İstanbul: Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.
• Dayıoǧlu, G. (2016). Suna'nın serçeleri [Suna's sparrows] (42. baskı): Çocuk Romanı.
• Çetinkaya, Ç., Ateş, S., & Yıldırım, K. (2013). Anlam kurmanın zor ve önemli bir becerisi: Ana fikri bulma [Difficult and curial skill in making meaning: Finding main idea]. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 9(3), 188-210.
• Cox, B. D. (1997). The rediscovery of the active learner in adaptive contexts: A developmental-historical analysis of transfer of training. Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 41-55.
• Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448-456.
• Chang, W. C., & Ku, Y. M. (2014). The effects of notetaking skills instruction on elementary students’ reading. Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 278-291.
• Carriedo N., & Tapia J. A. (1996). Main idea comprehension: Training teachers and effects on students. Journal of Research in Reading, 19(2), 128-153.
• Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2010). Direct instruction reading (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Pearson.
• Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
• Burke, L. (2012). Reading practices in social studies classrooms: Teacher support for middle-school students with ASC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University.
• Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations. Anderson, R., Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J.(Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 778-809). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macro rules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14.
• Billingsley, F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2(2), 229-241.
• Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
• Berkeley, S. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 20, International perspectives (pp. 79-99). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
• Beck, J. S., Buehl, M. M., & Barber, A. T. (2015). Students perceptions of reading and learning in social studies: A multi-method approach. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 1-16.
• Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., &Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 300-324.
• Aulls, M. W. (1986). Actively teaching main idea skills. In J. Boumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 96-129). International Reading Association, Newark, Delaware.
• Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
• Ateşman, E. (1997). Türkçede okunabilirliğin ölçülmesi [Measurement of readability in Turkish]. Dil Dergisi, 58, 71-74.
• Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-184.
• Akyol, H., Yıldırım, K., Ateş, A., Çetinkaya, Ç., & Rasinski, T. V. (2014). Okumayı değerlendirme [Reading assessment]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Akyol, H. (2011). Yeni programa uygun Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri [Turkish teaching methods appropriate to the new program]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Akyol, H. (2010). Türkçe ilkokuma yazma öğretimi [Teaching Turkish first literacy]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Aktaş, Ş., & Gündüz, O. (2001). Yazılı ve sözlü anlatım [Written and oral expression]. Ankara: Akçağ Yayıncılık.