Uygulamacılar İçin Özel Eğitimde Farklı Bir Bakış Açısı: Gömülü Öğretim

Derleme çalışması olarak hazırlanan bu çalışmanın amacı, doğal öğretim yaklaşımına ve doğal öğretim yaklaşımının ortaya çıkış felsefesine ilişkin genel bir bilgi vererek, doğal öğretim yaklaşımından biri olan gömülü öğretim sürecine ilişkin ayrıntılı bilgi sunmaktır. Çalışmada gömülü öğretim sürecinin temel uygulama ilkeleri ve basamakları ayrıntılı olarak açıklanmıştır. Makalede farklı uygulamacılar tarafından, farklı özellikteki çocuklara farklı davranışların öğretimine yönelik planlanan gömülü öğretim araştırmalarına ilişkin bilgi verilmiştir. Gömülü öğretim sürecinin gelişimsel yetersizliği olan okulöncesi dönemdeki çocuklara, çocukların ailelerine ve öğretmenlerine sağladığı katkılar paylaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, çalışmada gömülü öğretimin etkililiğinin ve verimliliğinin incelendiği alanyazın üzerinde durularak uygulamacılara yönelik önerilere yer verilmiştir.

A Different Instructional Perspective in Special Education for Practitioners: Embedded Instruction

The purpose of this study is to clarify the naturalistic instructional approach, to give an outline of the philosophy behind it and to share the approach’s benefits with regard to preschool children with developmental disabilities and their families and teachers by explaining the basic principles and steps of the embedded instruction process. In this study, it is given information about the researches related to embedded instruction that was planned for teaching different behaviors to the children with developmental disabilities by different practitioners. The contributions that the process of embedded instruction makes to preschooler with developmental disabilities, their families and teachers, are shared. In addition, the article examines the concept of embedded instruction in order to make suggestions for practitioners in the light of various research studies that emphasize the effectiveness and efficacy of the naturalistic instructional approach.

___

  • Yoder, P., & Stone, W. L. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(4), 698-711.
  • Woods, J., Kashinath, S., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Effects of embedding caregiver-implemented teaching strategies in daily routines on children’s communication outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 26(3), 175-193.
  • Woods, J., & Goldstein, H. (2006). Enhancing generalized teaching strategy use in routines by parents of children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(3),466-485.
  • Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., & Ault, M. J. (1993). Comparison of progressive time delay and transition-based teaching with preschoolers who have developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17(2), 160-176.
  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 14-25.
  • Wolery, M., Anthony, L., & Heckathorn, J. (1998). Transition-based teaching: Effects on transitions, teachers’ behaviour, and children’s learning. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 117-131.
  • Windsor, K. S. (2016). Effects of a caregiver-implemented intervention on the motor and communication outcomes of infants and toddlers with significant disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University). Retrieved from: http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03282016234208/unrestricted/WindsorDissertation.pdf
  • Venn, M. L., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Morris, A., DeCesare, L. D., & Cuffs, M. S. (1993). Embedding instruction in art activities to teach preschoolers with disabilities to imitate their peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8(3), 277-294.
  • Toelken, S., & Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Increasing independence among children diagnosed with autism using a brief embedded teaching strategy. Behavioral Interventions, 27(2), 93-104.
  • Tate, T. L., Thompson, R. H., & McKerchar, P. M. (2005). Training teachers in an infant classroom to use. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 206-221.
  • Şahin, Ş. (2015). Otizmli çocuklara toplumsal uyarı işaretlerinin öğretiminde geleneksel ve gömülü öğretimle sunulan sabit bekleme süreli öğretimin etkililik ve verimliliklerinin karşılaştırılması [A comparison of the traditionally presented constant time delay intruction and constant time delay instruction with embedded teaching on teaching community alert signs to children with autism spectrum disorders] (Unpublished master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey).
  • Snyder, P. A., Rakap, S., Hemmeter, M. L., McLaughlin, T. W., Sandall, S., & McLean, M. E. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 69-97.
  • Snyder, P. A., Hemmeter, M. L., & Fox, L. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practiced coaching. Topics of Early Special Education, 35(3),331-143.
  • Simpson K., & Keen D. (2010). Teaching young children with autism graphic symbols embedded within an interactive song. Journal of Development Physical Disabilities, 22(2), 165-177.
  • Sewell, T., J., Collins, B. C., Hemmeter, M. L., & Schuster, J. W. (1998). Using simultaneous prompting within an activity based format to teach dressing skills to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 132-145.
  • Schreibman, L. (2014, March). Can’t we all just get along?: Combining behavioral and developmental interventions for young children with autism. Paper presented at ABAI Autism Conference, San Diego.
  • Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Ownbey, J., & Parsons, M. B. (2001). Training support staff to embed teaching within natural routines of young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(3), 313-327.
  • Riesen, T., McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Polychronis, S., & Jameson, J. W. (2003). A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction in general education classes with students with moderate to severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(4), 241-259.
  • Rakap, S., & Balikci, S. (2016). Using embedded instruction to teach functional skills to a preschool child with autism. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63(1), 17-26.
  • Rakap, S., & Parlak-Rakap, A. (2011). Effectiveness of embedded instruction in early childhood special education: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 79-96.
  • Rakap, S. (2017b). Okulöncesi kaynaştırma eğitimi uygulamalarının desteklenmesinde doğal öğretim yaklaşımları [Naturalistic instructional approaches to support inclusion of preschool children with disabilities]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18, 1-22.
  • Rakap, S. (2017a). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 125-139.
  • Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention. London: Paul Brooks Pub.
  • Pierce, K., & Schreibman, L. (1995). Increasing complex social behaviors in children with autism: Effects of peerimplemented pivotal response training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(3), 285-295.
  • Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., & Lattimore, L. P. (2009). Increasing independence of adults with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practise, 2(2), 40-48.
  • Özen, A., Ergenekon, Y., Genç, D., & Ülke-Kürkçüoğlu, B. (2013). Kaynaştırma öğrencisi olan okulöncesi öğretmenlerinin sınıflarında yaptıkları öğretim uygulamalarının belirlenmesi [Teaching practices used by preschool teachers who have mainstreamed students in their classrooms]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 153-166.
  • Özen, A., & Ergenekon, Y. (2011). Özel eğitimde etkinlik temelli öğretim uygulamaları [Activity-based intervention practices in special education]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 351-362.
  • Özen, A. (2012). Sosyal yeterliğin geliştirilmesinde etkinlik temelli öğretim uygulamaları [Activity based teaching for developing social qualifications]. S. Vuran (Ed.) Sosyal yeterliklerin geliştirilmesi: Sosyal beceri yetersizliği gösteren çocuklar için (öğretmen adayları ve öğretmenler için) [Developing social qualifications, for students with social deficiency, for prospective teachers and teachers] içinde (pp. 135161). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Odluyurt, S., & Batu, S. (2010). Gelişimsel yetersizlik gösteren çocuklara kaynaştırmaya hazırlık becerilerinin öğretimi [Teaching inclusion preparation skillsto children with developmental disabilities]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(3),1533-1572.
  • Odluyurt, S. (2011). Etkinlikler içine gömülen sabit bekleme süreli öğretimin gelişimsel yetersizliği olan küçük çocuklara giysi isimlendirme becerisinin öğretimi üzerindeki etkililiği [The effects of constant time delay embedded into teaching activities for teaching the names of clothes for preschool children with developmental disabilities]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(3), 1445-1460.
  • Novick, R. (1993). Activity-based intervention and developmentally appropriate practice: Points of convergence. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(4), 403-417.
  • Noonan, M. J., & McCormick, L. (2006). Young children with disabilities in natural environments: Methods & procedures. London: Paul Brooks Pub.
  • Noh, J., Allen, D., & Squires, J. (2009). Use of embedded learning opportunities within daily routines by early intervention/early childhood special education teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 24(2), 1-10.
  • National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) (2014). Naturalistic Intervention. Evidence-Based Practices. Retrieved from: http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/naturalistic-intervention
  • National Autism Center (NAC). (2015). National Autism Center’s National Standards Report. Randolph, Massachusetts.
  • McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Polychronis, S., Risen, T., Jameson, M., & Kercher, K. (2006). Comparison of oneto-one embedded instruction in general education classes with small group instruction in special education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(2), 125-138.
  • McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Polychronis, S., & Risen, T. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(4), 363-377.
  • McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., & McQuivey, C. (2008). Embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms. A Publication of the Division on Developmental Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.
  • McBride, B. J., & Schwartz, I. S. (2003). Effects of teaching early interventionists to use discrete trials during ongoing classroom activities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(1), 5-17.
  • Malmskog, S., & McDonnell, A. P. (1999). Teacher-mediated facilitation of engagement by children with developmental delays in inclusive preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(4), 203216.
  • Macy, M. G., & Bricker, D. D. (2007). Embedding individualized social goals into routine activities in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Early Child Development and Care, 177(2), 107-120.
  • Losardo, A., & Bricker, D. (1994). Activity-based intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98(6), 744-65.
  • Kurt, O., & Tekin-İftar, E. (2008). A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction on teaching leisure skills to children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28(1), 53-64.
  • Kurt, O. (2011). Doğal öğretim yöntemleri [Naturalistic teaching methods]. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Davranış ve öğrenme sorunu olan çocukların eğitimi [Education of children with behavioral and learning difficulties] içinde (pp. 161-179). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Yayınları.
  • Kohler, F. W., Strain, P. S., Hoyson, M., & Jamieson, B. (1997). Merging naturalistic teaching and peer-based strategies to address the IEP objectives of preschoolers with autism: An examination of structural and child behaviour. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(4), 196-207.
  • Koegel, R. L., Vernon, T. W., & Koegel, L. K. (2009). Improving social initiations in young children with autism using reinforcers with embedded social interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(9), 1240-1251.
  • Kasari, C., Freeman, S., & Paparella, T. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 611620.
  • Johnson, J. W., McDonnell, J., Holzwarth, V. N., & Hunter, K. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 214-227.
  • Johnson, J. W., & McDonnell, J. (2004). An exploratory study of the implementation of embedded instruction by general educators with students with developmental disabilities. Education & Treatmant of Children, 27(1), 46-64.
  • Jameson, J. M., McDonnell, J., Polychronis, S., & Riesen T. (2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(5), 346-363.
  • Jameson, J. M., McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Riesen, T., & Polychronis, S. (2007). A comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in the general education classroom and one-to-one massed practice instruction in the special education classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(1), 23-44.
  • Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007). Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1446-1456.
  • Horn, E., Lieber, J., Li, S., Sandall, S., & Schwartz, I. (2000). Supporting young children's IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(4), 208-223.
  • Hancock, T. B., & Kaiser, A. P. (2002). The effects of trainer-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 39-54.
  • Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J. W., Hemmeter, M. L., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Using an embedding strategy to teach preschoolers with significant disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2), 139-162.
  • Grisham-Brown, J., Ridgley, R., Pretti-Frontczak, K., Litt, C., & Nielson, A. (2006). Promoting positive learning outcomes for young children in inclusive classrooms: A preliminary study of children’s progress toward pre-writing standards. Journal of Early and Intensive Behaviour Intervention, 3(1), 171-190.
  • Grisham-Brown, J., Hemmeter, M. L., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (2005). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings. London: Paul Brooks Pub.
  • Grisham-Brown, J., Pretti-Frontczak, K., Hawkins, S. R., & Winchell, B. N. (2009). Addressing early learning standards for all children within blended pre-school classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(3), 131-42.
  • Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., Hanney, N. M., Polick, A. S., & Heincke, M. R. (2012). Teaching receptive discriminations to children with autism: A comparison of traditional and embedded discrete trial teaching. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 49-59.
  • Fox, L., & Hanline, M. F. (1993). A preliminary evaluation of learning within developmentally appropriate early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(3), 308-327.
  • Eren, B., Deniz, J., & Düzkantar, A. (2013). Orff yaklaşımına göre hazırlanan müzik etkinlikleri içinde ipucunun giderek azaltılması yöntemi ile yapılan gömülü öğretimin otistik çocuklara kavram öğretmedeki etkililiği [The effectiveness of embedded teaching throughthe most-to-least prompting procedure in conceptteaching to children with autism within orff-basedmusic activities]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1863-1887.
  • Erbaş, D. (2005). Davranış değiştirme planı hazırlanması ve uygulanması [Preparing and implementing behavior modification plan]. G. Kırcaali-İftar (Ed.). Davranış ve öğrenme sorunu olan çocukların eğitimi [Education of children with behavioral and learning difficulties] içinde (pp. 161-179). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Yayınları.
  • Daugherty, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschoolers with developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(4), 213-221.
  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Chiara, L., Schuster, J. W., Bell, J. K., & Wolery, M. (1995). Small-group massed-trial and individuallydistributed-trial instruction with preschoolers. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(3), 203-217.
  • Engellilerin Haklarına İlişkin Milletlerarası Sözleşme [United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. (2009). Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf
  • Çocuk Haklarına İlişkin Milletlerarası Sözleşme [Convention on the Rights of the Child]. (1995). Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/turkey/crc/_cr23c.html
  • Berkeban, C. H. (2013). Gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocuklara toplumsal uyarı işaretlerinin öğretiminde gömülü öğretimle sunulan eşzamanlı ipucuyla öğretimin etkililiği [Effectiveness of simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction on teaching community sight words to children with developmental disabilities] (Unpublished master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey).
  • Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2010). Training teachers to promote pretend play in children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77(1), 85-106.
  • Barnett, D. W., Carey, K. T., & Hall, J. D. (1993). Naturalistic intervention design for young children: Foundations, rationales, and strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(4), 430-444.
  • Allen, K. D., & Cowan, R. J. (2008). Naturalistic teaching prodecedures. In J. K. Luiselli, D. C. Russo, W. P. Christian, & S. M. Wilczynski (Eds.), Effective practices for children with autism: Educational and behavioral support interventions that work (pp. 213-240). Oxford University Press.
  • Aldemir, Ö. (2017). Okulöncesi öğretmenlerince sunulan gömülü öğretimin kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin hedef davranışlarını edinmelerindeki etkileri [Effects of embedded instruction provided by preschool teachers on acquisition of target behaviors by children in inclusive classrooms] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey).