___

Betts, G. T. & Kercher, J. J. (2009). The autonomous learner model for the gifted and talented. In Renzulli, J. S. , Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S. ,Erkert, R. D. & Little, C.A. (Eds). System and models for developing the gifted and talented (49-105). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Bildiren, A & Kargın, T. (2019). The effects of project based approach in early ıntervention program on the problem solving ability of gifted children. Education and Science, 44 (198), 343-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7360

Brody, L. E., Muratori, M. C., Stanley, J. C. (2004). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students: Volume II (pp. 97–107). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social science] (3. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Clark, B. (1997). Social ideologies and gifted education in today’s school. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 (3-4), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681867

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G. & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vols. I and II). Iowa City, IA.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Marron, M. A. (2013). Evidence trumps beliefs: Academic acceleration is an effective intervention for high-ability students. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (p. 164–175). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Coşar, G., Çetinkaya, Ç. & Çetinkaya, Ç. (2015). Investigating the preschool training for gifted and talented students on gifted school teachers’ view. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 3(1) 13-21. DOI: 10.17478/JEGYS.2015110747

Çelen, B. (2010). Sanal araştırma ortamlarında doğrulayıcı geribildirim kullanımının motivasyona, akademik başarıya ve kalıcı öğrenmeye etkisi [The effects of the use of confirmative feedback in? cyber based drills atmosphere? (cbda) on motivation, academic success and permanent learning] (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 279846)

Çetinkaya, Ç. (2015). Gifted students and their parents views about the nature education program for gifted children. Oxidation Communications, 38 (1A), 434-444.

Çetinkaya, Ç. (2014). The effect of gifted students’ creative problem solving program on creative thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3722-3726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.830

Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). Sıradışı konular çalışma etkinliklerinin yaratıcılığa etkisi. [The effect of unusual topics study activities on creativity] (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 345832).

Çetinkaya, Ç. (2007). Raven’in ilerleyen matrisler plus testi’nin 6,5-8 yaş çocukları üzerinde geçerlik, güvenirlik, ön norm çalışmaları ve motivasyon stilleri tespiti ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi. [Raven’s progressive matrives plus test’s reliability, validity and pre norm studies on 6,5-8 year old children and the investigation of the relationship between there and the motivation types] (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 330108).

Çetinkaya, Ç., Maya Çalışkan, İ. & Güngör, H. (2012). Classroom management problems derives from gifted and talented students’ leadership qualities. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (24), 7-29.

Demirhan, C. (2002). Program geliştirmede proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı [Project based learning approach in curriculum development] (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 113538)

Demirli, C. (2002). Web tabanlı öğretimin öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme dersinde öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effect of Web based teaching on students achievement in instructional technologies and material development course (The sample technical education faculty of F.U.)] (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 122042)

Erdem, M. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi kapsamında beşinci sınıf öğrencileriyle yürütülen ekiple proje tabanlı öğrenme üzerine bir çalışma. Elementary Education Online,1 (1), 2-11.

Ersoy, A. (2006). İlköğretim beşinci sınıfta teknoloji destekli proje tabanlı öğrenme uygulamaları [Technologically supported project-based learning applications at the fifth grade of primary school] (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 191907)

Feldhusen, J. F., Hansen, J. B. & Kennedy, D. M. (1989). Curriculum development for CGT teachers. Gifted Child Today, 12 (6) 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621758901200603

Ford, D. (2003). Desegregating gifted education: Seeking equity for culturally diverse student. In J. H. Borland (Ed.) Rethinking gifted education. (p.143- 158). New York: Pergamon Press.

Gallagher, S.A. (2009). Adapting problem-based learning for gifted students. In Karnes, F.A. & Bean, S. M. (Eds). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd Ed) (p.301-330). TX: Prufrock Press Inc.

Getzels, J. W. & Chikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of the problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.

Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5, 1-17.

Huber, J., Treffinger, D. & Tracy, D. (1979). Self instructional use of programmed creativity training materials with gifted and regular students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 71 (3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.303

Jenkins- Fiedman, R. (1982). Myth: Cosmetic use of multiple selection criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly. 26, 24-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600108

Juntune, J. (1982). Myth: The gifted constitutes a single, homogeneous group. Gifted Child Quarterly. 26, 20-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600102

Kaptan, F. & Korkmaz, H. (2002), Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin akademik başarı, akademik benlik kavramı ve çalışma sürelerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 91-97.

Kaptan, S. (1993). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri [Rerearch and Statistic Technigues] (10. baskı). Ankara: Rehber Yayınevi

Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.C. (1997). Effect of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Exclellence. 22-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/1066568870230105

Land, S. M. & Greene, B. A. (1999). Project-based learning with the world wide web: a qualitative study of resource ıntegration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313485

Lee, C. & Tsai, F.Y. (2004). Internet project based learning environment: the effects of thinking styles on learning transfer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 31-39, Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00063.x

Lessinger, L. M. & Seagoe, M. V. (1963). The nature of enrichment for gifted students. The journal of Educational Reearch, 57 (3), 142-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1963.10883045

Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro Ed.

Maker, J. C. & Nielson, A. B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (2nd Ed) Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Manzanares, M. G. (2004). Attitudes of Counseling Students‟ Use of Web-Based Instruction for Online and Supplemental Instruction in a Master‟s Degree Program of Study. Doctoral Thesis, Colorado State University, Colorado.

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2014). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı okul öncesi eğitim ve ilköğretim kurumlar yönetmeliği. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/07/20140726-4.htm adresinden edinilmiştir.

Morgan, W. H. (1958). Providing for the gifted. The High School Journal, 42 (2), 34-45

Navan, J. L. (2002). Enhancing the achievement of all learners menas high ability students too. Middle School Journal, 32 (4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2002.11495353

Norton, M. S. (1959). Current provision for the gifted. The clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 33 (7), 425-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1959.11476600

Nosich, G. M. (2012). Eleştire düşünme ve disiplinlerarası düşünme rehberi. Çev. Birsel Ayberk. Ankara: Anı Yayıncıclık.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press

Renzulli, J. & Reis, S. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensve plan for the development of creative productivity. In N Colangelo and G. A. Davis Eds. Handbook of Gifted Education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Roberts, J. L. (2005). Enrichment opportunities for gifted learners. Waco, Tx: Prufrock Press.

Robinson, N.M. (2004). Effects of academic acceleration on the social-emotional status of gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline , & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp.59-67). Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Robinson, A., Shore, B. M. & Enersen, D. L. (2007). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.

Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306324

Rogers, K. B. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 47–57). Iowa City: University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development

Runko, M. A. (2006). Reasoning and personal creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. &Bear, J. (Eds). Creativity and reason in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scott, M. T. (2014). Multicultural differentiated instruction for gifted students. In A. F. Rotatori, J. P. Bakken & F. E. Obiakor (Eds). Gifted Education: Current perspective and issues, (147-166). Emerald Group Publishing.

Siegle, D., Wilson, H. E., & Little, C. A. (2013). A sample of gifted and talented educators’ attitudes about academic acceleration. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472491

Simpson, J. (2014). A case study enrichment seminar and gifted adolescents. Gifted and Talented International, 29, (1-2), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2014.11678430

Southern ,W. T. & Jones, E. D. (2004). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline M.U.M. Gross (Eds). A Nation deceived: How school hold back America’s brigshest students, 2, 5-12. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Şahin, F. (2018). Eğitsel stratejiler ve örneklerle zenginleştirilmiş müfredat farklılaştırma modelleri [Enriched Curriculum differentiation model with educational strategies and samples]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.

Şahin, F. (2015). Educational programs, services and support for gifted students in Turkey. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11 (4), 1207-1223.

Şahin, F & Çetinkaya, Ç. (2015). An investigation of the effectiveness and efficiency of classroom teachers in the identification of gifted students. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5 (2), 133-146.

Şahin, F & Kargın, T. (2013). The effect of a training programme on teachers’ knowledge on identification of talented students by primary school teachers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 14(2), 1-15.

Şahin, F., Özer, E & Deniz, M. E. (2016). The predictive level of emotional ıntelligence for the domain-specific creativity: A study on gifted students. Education and Science, 41 (183), 181-197.

Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). A history of giftedness in the school and society. International Handbook of Gifted and Talent, 2, 23-53.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

Tomlinson, C.A. (2013). Differentiated instruction. In C. M. Callahan & H.L. Herberg-Davis (Eds), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspective, 287-300. New York, NY: Routledge.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high ability learners. In Renzulli, J. S. , Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S. ,Erkert, R. D. & Little, C.A. (Eds). System and models for developing the gifted and talented (571-599). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively?. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), 114-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00923.x

Treffinger, D. J. (1982). Gifted students, regular classroom: Sixty ingredients for a better blend. The Elementary School Journal, 82 (3), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1086/461264

Trefinger, D. J & Selby, E. C. (2009). Levels of service: A contemporary approach to programming for talent development. In Renzulli, J. S. , Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S. ,Erkert, R. D. & Little, C.A. (Eds). System and models for developing the gifted and talented (629-655). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Tsai, D. M. (2007). Differentiating curriculum for gifted students by providing accelerated options. Gifted Education Journal, 23 (1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300111

VanTasel Baska, J. (2003). Content based curriculum for high ability learners: An introduction. Waco, TX: Profrook Press.

VanTasel Baska, J. & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Pratice. 44, 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5

Ward, C. (2010). Using online learning environments to support advanced learners. In J. Sanchez ve K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 377-381

Xenos Whiston, M. & Leroux, J. A. (1992). Gifted Education: Isn’t this good for all children?. Middle School Journal, 23 (4), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1992.11496061

Yılmaz, Ö. (2012). Proje tabanlı sanal öğrenme yeterlilikleri (PTSÖY) ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Development of the scale of Project Based Virtual Learning Qualifications (PBVLQ) and examination of its psychometric properties] (Yükseklisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez Numarası: 306490)