İyi ve Zayıf Okuyucular için Okuduğunu Anlama: Kuramsal ve Ampirik Açıdan Bir Bakış

Öz Okuma becerisi bireylerin akademik ve yaşamsal başarısı açısından eşsiz bir yere sahiptir. “Matthew Ekisi” adlı bir teori, iyi ve zayıf okuyucuların uzun bir zaman diliminde birbirlerinden nasıl farklılaştığını ve iyi okuyucuların zayıf okuyuculara göre başta kademik başarı olmak üzere diğer pek çok alanda nasıl belirgin üstünlükler kazandığını gözler önüne sermektedir. Okuma becerisinin özünü ise grafiksel sembolleri çözümleyip seslendirme yapmanın ötesinde bir anlam arayışı ve ona ulaşma süreci olan okuduğunu anlama becerisi oluşturmaktadır. Okuduğunu anlama, odak noktası okunan şeylerin anlamını yapılandırma ve yorumlama olan karmaşık, çok boyutlu ve dinamik bir süreçtir. Güncel literatüre dayalı bir derleme çalışması olan bu araştırmada, iyi ve zayıf okuyucular için okuduğunu anlam süreci hem teorik ve hem de güncel araştırmalar ışığında çok yönlü ve bütünsel bir bakış açısıyla incelenmiştir. Okumanın Temel Teorisi, temel ve üst düzey dil becerileri ve göreve özgü süreçler olarak bilinen yürütücü işlevlerin okuduğunu anlama üzerindeki etkileri ele alınarak önemli bilgi ve açıklamalara yer verilmiştir.

___

  • Baydık, B. (2002). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin sözcük okuma becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of the word reading skills of children with and without reading disability] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi. (Thesis Number 122517)
  • Baydık, B. (2011). Examining use of metacognitive reading strategies of students with reading difficulties and their teachers’ reading comprehension instruction practices. Education and Science, 36(162), 301-319.
  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1998). Comrehension: The sine qua none of reading. In S. Patton & M. Holmes (Eds.), The keys to literacy (pp.40-52). Washington, DC: Council for Bassic Education.
  • Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144-179.
  • Cain, K. (2016). Reading comprehension development and difficulties: An overview. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(2), 9-16.
  • Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489-503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205
  • Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J. V. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683-696. doi:10.1348/000709905X67610
  • Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers' processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 429-441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022824
  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X69807
  • Carney, J. J., Anderson, D., Blackburn, C., & Blessing, D. (1984). Pre-teaching vocabulary and the comprehension of social studies materials by elementary school children. Social Education, 48 (3), 195-196.
  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278-293. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
  • Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323
  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 331-361. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2
  • Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading‐related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 151-164. doi:10.1177/002221940303600208
  • Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2006). Exploring written narrative in children with poor reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 26 (1), 55-72. doi:10.1080/01443410500340991
  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
  • Baydık, B. (2002). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin sözcük okuma becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of the word reading skills of children with and without reading disability] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi. (Thesis Number 122517)
  • Baydık, B. (2011). Examining use of metacognitive reading strategies of students with reading difficulties and their teachers’ reading comprehension instruction practices. Education and Science, 36(162), 301-319.
  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1998). Comrehension: The sine qua none of reading. In S. Patton & M. Holmes (Eds.), The keys to literacy (pp.40-52). Washington, DC: Council for Bassic Education. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144-179.
  • Cain, K. (2016). Reading comprehension development and difficulties: An overview. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(2), 9-16.
  • Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489-503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205
  • Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J. V. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683-696. doi:10.1348/000709905X67610
  • Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers' processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 429-441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022824
  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X69807
  • Carney, J. J., Anderson, D., Blackburn, C., & Blessing, D. (1984). Pre-teaching vocabulary and the comprehension of social studies materials by elementary school children. Social Education, 48 (3), 195-196.
  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278-293. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
  • Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323
  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 331-361. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2
  • Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading‐related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 151-164. doi:10.1177/002221940303600208
  • Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2006). Exploring written narrative in children with poor reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 26 (1), 55-72. doi:10.1080/01443410500340991
  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
  • Güldenoğlu, B., Kargın, T., & Miller, P. (2015). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin cümle anlama becerilerinin incelenmesi [Examining the sentence comprehension skills of students with and without reading diffculties] . Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Psychology], 30(76), 82-100.
  • Güzel, R. (1998). Alt özel sınıflardaki öğrencilerin sesli okudukları öyküyü anlatma becerilerini kazanmalarında doğrudan öğretim yöntemiyle sunulan bireyselleştirilmiş okuduğunu anlama materyalinin etkililiği [The effectiveness of teaching with individualized teaching material for reading comprehension presenting through direct instruction method in the students of lower special classes to gain the ability to retell the story they read aloud] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi. (Thesis Number 73975)
  • Hall, K. M., Sabey, B. L., & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26(3), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590962550
  • Heilman, A. W., Blair, T.R., & Rupley, W. H. (1998). Principles and practices of teaching reading (9th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall
  • Henderson, L., Snowling, M. J., & Clarke, P. (2013). Accessing, integrating, and inhibiting word meaning in poor comprehenders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 177-198. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.652721
  • Hogan, T. P., Cain, K., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Young children’s oral language abilities and later reading comprehension. In T. Shanahan & C. J. Lonigan (Eds.), Early childhood literacy: The National Early Literacy Panel and beyond (pp. 217-232). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
  • Hudson, N., Scheff, J., Tarsha, M., & Cutting, L. E. (2016). Reading comprehension and executive function neurobiological findings. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(2), 23-29.
  • Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948702000401
  • Jimenez, R. T., Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 90-112.
  • Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015956
  • Kim, Y. S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293
  • Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2007). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc5&NEWS=N&AN=2007-11367-000
  • Landi, N. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher‐level and lower‐level reading sub‐skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701-717. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z
  • Landi, N., & Ryherd, K. (2017). Understanding specific reading comprehension deficit: A review. Linguistics and Language Compass, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12234
  • Lepola, J., Lynch, J., Laakkonen, E., Silvén, M., & Niemi, P. (2012). The role of inference making and other language skills in the development of narrative listening comprehension in 4-6-year-old children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.020
  • Locascio, G., Mahone, E. M., Eason, S., & Cutting, L. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43 (5), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355476
  • Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8 Manguel, A. (2014). A history of reading. New York: Penguin Books.
  • McGee, A., & Johnson, H. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303220
  • McLaughlin, M. J., Speirs, K. E., & Shenassa, E. D. (2014). Reading disability and adult attained education and income: Evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study of a population-based sample. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(4), 374-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412458323
  • Meyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1162357
  • Miller, B. A. (1993). Rural distress and survival: The school and the importance of “community”. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 84-103.
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665
  • Nation, K. (2005). Children's reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowing & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248-266). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998a). Individual differences in contextual facilitation: evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Development, 69(4), 996-1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06157.x
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998b). Semantic processing and the development of word‐recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 85-101. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2564
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002046
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/NICHD. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
  • Oakhill, J.& Cain, K. (2016). Supporting reading comprehension development from research to practice. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(2), 32-39.
  • Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36-76. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.38.1.3
  • Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2007). Teaching narrative comprehension strategies to first graders. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000709336701
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. V. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-253). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2014). Poor comprehenders in the classroom: Teacher ratings of behavior in children with poor reading comprehension and its relationship with individual differences in working memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412454172
  • Pintrich, P. R., Anderman, E. M., & Klobucar, C. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(6), 360-370.
  • Pitts, M. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: Definition and practice. Journal of Reading, 26(6), 516-523. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40031758
  • Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score modeling study. Child Development, 86(1), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12292
  • Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97-110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Scott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0042)
  • Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029
  • Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children’s picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 960-974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.960
  • Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2002). Young children’s detection of violations in familiar stories and emerging comprehension monitoring. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3302_04
  • Snowling, M. J., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C., & Tobin, V. (2000). Levels of literacy among juvenile offenders: The incidence of specific reading difficulties. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 10(4), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.362
  • Snyder, L., Caccamise, D., & Wise, B. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension considerations and cautions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00005
  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72-110. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072
  • Stanford, G., & Oakland, T. (2000). Perspectives from the United States: Cognitive deficits underlying learning disabilities. School Psychology International, 21(3), 306-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034300213007
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
  • Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1995). A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(3), 399-408.
  • Tomesen, M., & Aarnoutse, C. (1998). Effects of an instructional programme for deriving word meanings. Educational Studies, 24(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569980240108
  • Tompkins, G. E. (2010). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3-32 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1101_2
  • Weaver, C. A., III, & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230-244). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Welsh, J. A., Nix, R. L., Blair, C., Bierman, K. L., & Nelson, K. E. (2010). The development of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low-income families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016738
  • Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129-144.
  • Woollams, A. M., Ralph, M. A. L., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2007). SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. Psychological Review, 114(2), 316-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.316
  • Yuill, N., & Joscelyne, T. (1988). Effect of organizational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders' story understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 152-158. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.152
  • Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. V. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-7639
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1991
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi