___

• Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied behaviour analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Alptekin, S., Vural, M., & Aksoy, Y. (2016). Matematik performansı düşük öğrencide toplama iÅŸlemi yapma akıcılığını artırmaya yönelik örnek uygulama: KeÅŸfet-kopyala-karşılaÅŸtır (cover-copy-compare) [A sample activity for improving the addition fluency of students with poor mathematics Performance: Cover-Copy-Compare]. Ondokuz Mayıs Ãœniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education], 35(1), 103-116.
• Aspiranti, K. B., Skinner, C. H., McCleary, D. F., & Cihak, D. F. (2011). Using taped problems and rewards to increase addition-fact fluency in a first-grade general education classroom. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(2), 25-33.
• Baykul, Y. (2006). Ä°lköğretimde matematik öğretimi [Teaching mathematics in primary education] (9. Baskı) [9th ed.]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Billington, E. J., & DiTommaso, N. M. (2003). Demonstrations and applications of the matching law in education. Joumal of Behavioral Education, 12(2), 91-104. doi: 1053-0819/03/0600-009
• Bliss, S. L., Skinner, C. H., McCallum, E., Saecker, L. B., Rowland-Bryant, E., & Brown, K. S. (2010). A comparison of taped problems with and without a brief posttreatment assessment on multiplication fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(2), 156-168. doi: 10.1007/s10864-010-9106-5
• Bryant, B. R., Ok, M., Kang, E. Y., Kim, M. K., Lang, R., Bryant, D. P., & Pfannestiel, K. (2015). Performance of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities on multiplication facts comparing teacher-mediated and technology-mediated interventions: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(2), 255-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9218-z
• Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Kit-hung, L., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to- moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39(1), 20-31.
• Carnine, D., Jitendra, A., & Silbert, J. (1997). A descriptive analysis of mathematics curricular materials from a pedagogical perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2), 66-81.
• Cates, G. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: An instructional hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(1), 23-34. doi:1053-0819/03/0300-0023/0
• Cozad, L. E., & Riccomini, P. J. (2016). Effects of digital-based math fluency interventions on learners with math difficulties: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 5(2), Retrieved from http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/josea/vol5/iss2/2
• Cressey, J., & Ezbicki, K. (2008). Improving automaticity with basic addition facts: do taped problems work faster than cover, copy, compare?. Paper presented at NERA Annunal Conference. Connecticut, USA. Retrived from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.tr/&httpsredir=1 &article=1003&context=nera_2008
• Duhon, G. J., House, S. H., & Stinnett, T. A. (2012). Evaluating the generalization of math fact fluency gains across paper and computer performance modalities. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 335-345. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.003
• ErbaÅŸ, D. (2012). Güvenirlik [Reliability]. E. Tekin-Ä°ftar (Ed.), EÄŸitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araÅŸtırmalar [Single-subject research in education and behavioral sciences] içinde (ss. 109-128). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar DerneÄŸi Yayınları [Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Psychological Association Publications].
• Freeman, T. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1984). Effects of a taped-words treatment procedure on learning disabled students' sight-word oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(1), 49-54.
• Gagne, R. M. (1982). Some issues in psychology of mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 7-18.
• Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539-1552. doi:10.1037/a0025510
• Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293-304. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380040301
• Gurganus, S. P. (2017). Math instruction for learning problems (2nd. ed). Newyork: Routledge.
• Hayter, S., Scott, E., McLaughlin, T.F. & Weber, K. P. (2007). The use of a modified direct instruction flashcard system with two high school students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19(4), 409-415.
• Hinton, V., Strozier, S. D., & Flores, M. M. (2014). Building mathematical fluency for students with disabilities or students at-risk for mathematics failure. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 257-265.
• Hudson, P., & Miller, S. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 281-288.
• Kleinert, W. L., Codding, R. S. Minami T., & Gould, K. (2018). A meta-analysis of the taped problems intervetion. Journal of Behavior Education, 27(1), 53-80. doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9284-5
• Kroesbergen, E., & Van Luit, J. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97-114. doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240020501
• Lewis, R. B., & Doorlag, D. H. (1999). Teaching special students in general education classroom. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
• Maag, J. W., & Webber, J. (1995). Promoting children’s social development in general education classrooms. Researcah in Developmental Disabilities. 39(23), 13-20.
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2004). The inclusive classroom strategies for effective ınstruction (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Colombus Ohio.
• McCallum, E., & Schmitt, A. J. (2011). The taped problems intervention: Increasing the math fact fluency of a student with an intellectual disability. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 276-284.
• McCallum, E., Schmitt, A. J., Schneider, D. L, Rezzetano, K., & Skinner, C. H. (2010). Extending research on the taped-problems intervention: Do group rewards enhance math fact fluency development? School Psychology Forum, 4(1), 44-61. doi: 10.1080/15377900903175861
• McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., & Hutchins, H. (2004). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing division fact fluency using a low-tech self-managed time-delay intervention. Joumal of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 129-147. doi: 10.1300/J370v20n02_08
• McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., Turner, H., & Saecker, L. (2006). The taped-problem intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using low-tech classwide, time delay intervention. School Psychology Review, 35(3), 419-434.
• Miller, S. P., Hall, S. W., & Heward, W. L. (1995). Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials with and without inter-trial feedback and self-correction on general and special education students fluency with math facts. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5(3), 319-345.
• Miller, K. C., Skinner, C. H., Gibby, L., Galyon, C. E., & Meadows-Allen, S. (2011). Evaluating generalization of addition-fact fluency using the taped-problems procedure in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(3), 203-220. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9126-9
• Milli EÄŸitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2018). Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı [Mathematics instruction program]. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9E RET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf.
• Mong, M. D., & Mong, K. W. (2012). The utility of brief experimental analysis and extended intervention analysis in selecting effective mathematics interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(2), 99-118. doi: 10.1007/s10864-011-9143-8
• Morin, V. A., & Miller, S. P. (1998). Teaching multiplication to middle school students with mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 21(1), 22-26.
• Özyürek, M. (2009). BiliÅŸsel ve devimsel davranışları öğretmeyi kazandırma [To teach cognitive and knesthetic behaviors]. Ä°stanbul: Daktylos Yayıncılık.
• Poncy, B. C., Fontenelle, S. F., & Skinner, C. H. (2013). Using detect, practice, and repair (dpr) to differentiate and individualize math fact instruction in a class-wide setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22(3), 211-228. doi: 10.1007/s10864-013-9171-7
• Poncy B. C., Jaspers, K. E., Hansmann, P. R., Bui, L., & Matthew, W. B. (2015). A comparison of taped-problem interventions to increase math fact fluency: Does the length of time delay affect student learning rates? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(1), 63-82. doi: 10.1080/15377903.2014.963273
• Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. E. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9025-7
• Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & McCallum, E. (2012). A comparison of class-wide taped problems and cover, copy, and compare for enhancing mathematics fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 49(8), 744-755. doi:10.1002/pits.21631
• Rhymer, K. N., Henington, C., Skinner, C. H., & Looby, E. J. (1999). The effects of explicit timing on mathematics performance in second-grade Caucasian and African-American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(4), 397-407. doi:10.1037/h0089016
• Salend, J. S. (2001). Creating inclusive classroms. Effective and reflective practices (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
• Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems, direct assessment and intervention (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D., & Davis, K. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 389-403. doi: 10.1002/pits.20065.
• Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-managed interventions for increasing academic performance. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 202-210.
• Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (2006). Desining effective mathematics instruction a direct instruction approach (3th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Stocker, J. D., & Kubina, R. M. (2017). Impact of cover, copy, and compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 56-68. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2016.1196643.
• SucuoÄŸlu, B., & Kargın, T. (2006). Ä°lköğretimde kaynaÅŸtırma uygulamaları: Yaklaşımlar yöntemler teknikler [Mainstreaming practices in primary education: Approaches, methods, techniques]. Ankara: Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
• Tekin-Ä°ftar, E. (2012). Çoklu yoklama modelleri. [Multiple probe models]. E. Tekin-Ä°ftar (Ed.), EÄŸitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araÅŸtırmalar [Single-subject research in education and behavioral sciences] içinde (ss. 217-243). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar DerneÄŸi Yayınları [Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Psychological Association Publications].
• Tekin-Ä°ftar, E., & Kırcaali-Ä°ftar, G. (2016). Özel eÄŸitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri [Responce promting methods in special education] (3. baskı) [3rd ed.]. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
• Uysal, H. (2017). Zihin yetersizliÄŸi olan öğrencilere temel toplama iÅŸlemlerinde akıcılık kazandırmada iki farklı uygulamanın karşılaÅŸtırılması [The comparison of two treatments for enhancing basic addition facts fluency of students with intellectuel disabilities] (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu Ãœniversitesi, EÄŸitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, EskiÅŸehir [Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences, EskiÅŸehir, Turkey].
• Vuran, S., & Sönmez, M. (2008). Sosyal geçerlik kavramı ve Türkiye’de özel eÄŸitim alanında yürütülen lisansüstü tezlerde sosyal geçerliÄŸin deÄŸerlendirilmesi [Concept of social validity and assessment of graduate theses interms of social validity conducted in special education field in Turkey]. Ankara Ãœniversitesi EÄŸitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel EÄŸitim Dergisi [Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education], 9(1), 55-65.
• Windingstad, S., Skinner, C. H., Rowland, E., Cardin, E., & Fearrington, J. Y. (2009). Extending research on a math fluency building intervention: Applying taped problems in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(4), 364-381. doi: 10.1080/15377900903175861.
• Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
• Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4), 269-289. doi: org/10.2307/30035554.
• Yıkmış, A., & Kot, M. (2017). Bölme iÅŸlemleri [Division facts]. O. Gürsel (Ed.), özel gereksinimli öğrencilere matematik beceri ve kavramlarının öğretimin planlama ve uygulama içinde[Planning and application of mathematical skills and concepts to students with special needs] (ss. 343-366). Ankara, Turkey: Vize Yayıncılık.