Kentsel Tarihî Semtlerin Ekonomik Değerlerinin Hedonik Fiyatlandırma Modeli ile Tespiti: Ankara Kalesi Semti

Bir toplumun tarihsel ve sosyokültürel değerlerinin temel kaynağı olan tarihî semtler, kentliler için anlamsal bir değere sahiptir. Ancak günümüzde bu alanların kültürel kimliği ve insanlara sundukları anlamsal değerler kentsel tasarım ve planlama çalışmalarında göz ardı edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, insanların tarihî semtlere daha yakın yaşama isteklerini ortaya çıkarmayı ve yerel yönetimlerin bu alanların kentsel dokuda yerel bir kimlik olarak korunması konusundaki farkındalıklarını artırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Tarihî semtler piyasa dışı ürünler olduğundan, anlamsal değerlerinin belirlenmesi karmaşık bir süreçtir. Hedonik Fiyatlandırma Modeli, piyasa dışı ürünlerin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Çalışmada, tarihî bir semt olarak Ankara Kale semtine yakınlığın konut fiyatlarına etkisi bu model yardımıyla incelenmektedir. Bu kapsamda, Ankara Kale semtinin 1500 metre yarıçapında yer alan toplam 422 konut incelenmiş ve Ankara Kalesi’ne olan mesafenin konut fiyatı üzerindeki etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Ankara Kale semtine yakın yaşama ve bunun için ödeme yapma isteği dolaylı olarak konut fiyatlarının artışına neden olmuştur. Ankara Kalesi’nin 500 metrelik yarıçapında yer alan konutlar, uzaktaki benzer konutlara göre % 34,3 daha fazla fiyatla satılmaktadır. Ayrıca, Ankara Kale semtine yakın konutların fiyatları her 100 metrede bir uzaklaştıkça % 5 azalmaktadır.

Determining the Economic Value of Historic Urban Districts through the use of the Hedonic Pricing Model: Ankara Castle District

Historic districts, which are an essential source of a society’s historical and sociocultural values, have a semantic value for urban residents. However, the cultural identity of these areas and the semantic values they offer to people are often ignored nowadays in urban design and planning studies. This study aims to reveal the desire of many people to live closer to historic districts, and to encourage local governments to be more aware of the need to conserve these urban areas due to their value as part of a local identity. As historic districts are not normally on the market, determining their semantic value is a complex process, but one that can be achieved with the Hedonic Pricing model. In this study, the effect on house prices of being close to the historic district of Ankara Castle was examined with the help of this Model. In the study, a total of 422 houses was examined, all of which were located within a radius of 1500 meters from the district of Ankara Castle, and the effect of the distance to Ankara Castle on the price of the houses was evaluated. According to the results, the desire to live close to the district was reflected in higher house prices. Houses located within a 500 meter radius of Ankara Castle are sold at an average of 34.3% more than similar houses farther away. It was also found that the price of houses decreased by 5% with each additional 100m of distance away from the district of Ankara Castle.

PDF

___

Ahlfeldt, G.M. and Maennig, W. (2010). Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: external effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Economics, 38(2), 285- 323.
Alberini, A. and Longo, A. (2009). Valuing the cultural monuments of Armenia: Bayesian updating of prior beliefs in contingent valuation. Environment and Planning A, 41, 441–460.
Armitage, L. and Irons, J. (2013). The Values of Built Heritage. Property Management, 31(3), 246-259.
Baker, R. and Ruting, B. (2014). Environmental policy analysis: a guide to non-market valuation. Canberra: Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper.
Baranzini, A., Ramirex, J., Schaerer, C. and Thalmann, P. (2008). Hedonic methods in housing markets: pricing environmental amenities and segregation. Berlin: Springer.
Castells, M. (2009). Power of identity: economy, society, and culture (2nd Edition). USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the city. Routledge.
Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. and Brown, T.C. (2003). A Primer on nonmarket valuation kluwer academic. Boston, MA.
Díaz-Andreu, M. (2017). Heritage values and the public. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4(1), 2–6.
Falck, O. Fritsch, M. and Heblich, S. (2011). The Phantom of the Opera: Cultural Amenities, Human Capital, and Regional Economic Growth. Labour Economics, 18,755–766.
Feary, S., Brown, S., Marshall, D., Lilley, I., Mckinnon, R., Verschuuren, B. and Wild, R. (2015). Earth’s Cultural Heritage. In GL, Worboys, M, Lockwood, A, Kothari, S, Feary and I, Pulsford (Eds.), Protected area governance and management (p. 81–116). Australia: ANU Press.
Foss, C. (1977). Late Antique and Byzantine Ankara. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 31, 70-72.
Goodman, A.C. and Thibodeau, Th. G. (2003). Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(3), 181-201.
Hicks, R.L. and Queen, B.M. (2016). Valuing historical and open space amenities with hedonic property valuation models. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 45(1), 44–67.
Junainah, M., Suriatini, I., Abdul Hamid, M.I. and Thuraiya, M. (2017). Assessment of heritage property values using multiple regression analysis and rank transformation regression. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6), 207-219.
Lamprakos, M. (2005). Rethinking Cultural Heritage: Lessons From Sana’a, Yemen, Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 16(2),17-37.
Lazrak, F., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., Rouwendal, J. (2014). The market value of cultural heritage in urban areas: an application of spatial hedonic pricing. Journal of Geographical Systems, 16, 89-114.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of space. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 209–31.
Law of Turkey (1983, 7 12). Law on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property-Law Number: 2863. Retrieved 2 23, 2021, from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ MevzuatMetin/1.5.2863.pdf.
Li, D.L., Cheng, J.F., Huang, M. L. and Chi, Y.Y. (2018). Valuation of cultural heritage - a hedonic pricing analysis of housing via GIS-Based Data. Kyoto Japan, 20(4), 1910-1916.
Mason, R. (2002). Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. In M. De la Torre (Ed.), Assessing the values of cultural heritage (p. 5-30). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.https:// www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_ publications/pdf/assessing.pdf
Merciu, F.C., Ianoș, I., Cercleux, A.L. and Merciu, G.L. (2020). Evaluation of the economic values of urban heritage in the central area of Ploieşti Municipality. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 26(2), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2020-0053
Moro, M., Mayor, K., Lyons, S. and Tol, R. S. J. (2013). Does the housing market reflect cultural heritage? A case study of greater Dublin. Environment and Planning A, 45, 2884- 2903.
Navrud, S. and Ready, R.C. (2002). Valuing cultural heritage, applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Northampton: Edward Elgar Pub.
Noonan, D. S. (2007). Finding an impact of preservation policies: price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in Chicago, 1990–1999. Economic Development, 21(4), 17–33.
Peacock, A. (1998). Does the past have a future? The political economy of heritage. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.
Snowball, J. (2008). Measuring the value of culture. Berlin: Springer.
Sopranzetti, B.J. (2010). Hedonic Regression Analysis in Real Estate Markets: A Primer. In C. F. Lee and C. A. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative finance and risk management (p.1201–1207). Berlin: Springer.
Ruijgrok, E. C. M. (2006). The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in The Netherlands. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7(3), 206–213.
Taher Tolou Del, M.S, Sedghpour, B.S. and Kamali Tabrizi, S. (2020). The Semantic Conservation of Architectural Heritage: The Missing Values, Heritage Science, 8(70), 1-13.
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Throsby, D. (2002). Cultural capital and sustainability concepts in the economics of cultural heritage. In M. De la Torre (Ed.), Assessing the values of cultural heritage (p. 101-118). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Throsby, D. (2003). Cultural capital. In R. Towse (Ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics (166-169). Cheltenham: Eward Elgar Publishing.
Throsby, D. (2006). Paying for the past: economics, cultural heritage, and public policy. In K. Anderson (Ed.). Joseph Fisher lecture in commerce, V. 51 (p. 1-13). Australia: The University of Adelaide.
Throsby, D. (2012). Heritage economics: a conceptual framework. In G. Licciardi and R. Amirtahmasebi (Eds.) The economics of uniqueness, investing in the historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development (p. 45-74). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
TMMOB, (2019). Şehir Plancılar Odası; Çalıştay: Ulus Koruma Amaçli Imar Planı, Ankara. Retrieved from: https://www. spo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=9866&tipi= 2&sube=1
Tunçer, M. (2019). Korunamayan kültürel miras Hacı Bayram Camisi ve Augustus Tapınağı çevresi. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
UNESCO. (2009). UNESCO Framework for Cultural Statistics. Montreal: UNESCO.
Vukonić, B. (2018). Similarities and differences of historical cities as tourism destinations. Acta Turistica, 30, 83-94.
Xiao, Y. (2017). Urban morphology and housing market. Singapour: Singapour Springer.
Zin, N. M., Suriatini, I., Junainah, M., Nurul, H.A.M. and Fatin Afiqah, Md. A. (2019). Critical determinants of heritage property value: a conceptual framework. Planning Malaysia, 17(1), 219 – 231.