Self-reported problems of pre-service EFL teachers throughout teaching practicum

Hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar öğretmen yetiştirme programlarında öğretmenlik uygulaması ve öğrenci-öğretmenlik deneyiminin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma öğrenciöğretmenlerin öğretmenlik uygulaması sürecinde yaşadıkları olumsuz noktaların kendi ifadeleriyle belirlenmesini ve bu noktaların uygulama sürecinde herhangi bir değişiklik gösterip göstermediğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışmaya Anadolu Üniversitesi İngilizce Öğretmenliği Programında öğretmenlik uygulaması yapan 99 İngilizce öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Veri toplama amacıyla katılımcılardan her bir öğretmenlik deneyimlerini yansıtan yansıtma raporu yazmaları istenmiştir.Elde edilen veriler iletişimbirimlerine bölünmüş, her bir iletişimbirimi problemnoktalara göre isimlendirilmiş ve etiketlendirilmiştir. Bu yöntemle oluşturulan kategoriler aynı zamanda iletişim birimlerinin belirlenme zamanlarına göre zaman aralıklarına bölünmüştür.Verilerin analizi öğrenci-öğretmenlerin problemlerinin kaynağı olarak beş temel kategori ortaya koymuştur: öğrenci-öğretmen kaynaklı problemler, öğrenci kaynaklı problemler,rehber öğretmen kaynaklı problemler,eğitim ortamı/sistem kaynaklı problemler ve rehber öğretim elemanı kaynaklı problemler.Yapılan karşılaştırmalar hizmet öncesi öğretmenler in problemlerinin genel anlamda öğretmenlik uygulaması sürecinin sonunda azaldığını, buna karşılık bazı noktaların genel eğilimin aksine süreç içinde bir artış veya azalma göstermediği gibi bazılarının da genel eğilimin aksi yönde değişim gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Çalışma sonuçlarının hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimine nasıl yansıyabileceği, bu programlarda nasıl iyileştirmelere yer verilebileceği ya da değişikliklere gidilirken nelerin göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiği konuları irdelenmiş ve bulgular doğrultusunda önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının öğretmelik uygulaması boyunca yaşadığı sorunlar

Recent literature on pre-service teacher education emphasizes the importance of student teaching in teacher education programs. For this reason, this study was designed to determine the self-reported problems of pre-service teachers' teaching and to find out whether there is any kind of change in the problems of student teachers throughout the practicum. Ninety-nine Turkish EFL teachers were chosen as the participants of the study who were told to write reflections on their each teaching experience. Data were analyzed by dividing the reflection reports into communication units. Each communication unit was named and labeled according to problems in student teachers' teaching experiences.Categorieswere also divided into three time periods considering the time of the communication units as stated by student teachers. The analysis of the data revealed five main categories as the sources of student teachers' problems. The analysis suggested that most of the problems of student teachers decrease in frequency whereas some of them increase towards the end of the practicum, or do not show any changes throughout the practicum. Consequently, the study stresses the need for modification in the teacher training curriculum and offers behavioral guidelines to student teachers, cooperating teachers, and university supervisors.

___

  • Aydın, B. and Bahçe, A. (2001). Cases from student teachers. Paper presented at the “International ELT Conference- 2001 on ‘Searching for Quality in ELT" May 2-4, 2001. Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa.
  • Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R. and Packer, J. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and teaching:theory and practice, 8 (2), 171-196.
  • Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., Draper, M., King, J. Oropallo, K. and Radencich, M. C. (2001). Four approaches to preservice teachers’ involvement in the writing of case stories: a qualitative research project. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 417-431.
  • Beck, C. and Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a good practicum placement: student teacher perceptions. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 81-98.
  • Block, S. (2001). Thinking about teaching. American School Board Journal November, 188 (1).
  • Bourke, J. M. (2001). The role of TP TESL supervisor. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27 (1), 63-73.
  • Brinton, D. and Holten, C. (1989). What novice teachers focus on: The practicum in TESL. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (2), 343-350.
  • Burant, T. J. and Kirby, D. (2002). Beyond classroom-based early field experiences: understanding an “educative practicum” in an urban school and community. Teaching and Teacher Education,18, 561-575.
  • Chan, K. W. and Leung, M. T. (1998). Hong Kong preservice teachers’ focus of concerns and confidence to teach –a perspective of teacher development. Paper presented at the “Australian Association of Research in Education 1998 Conference”, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Chapman, B. S. (1999). Praxis: An adult education practicum. Adult Learning, 11 (1), 14-17.
  • Chepyator-Thomson, J. R. and Liu, W. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ reflections on student teaching experiences: lessons learned and suggestions for reform in PETE programs. Physical Educator,60 (2), 2-12.
  • Clark, C. M. (2002). Newquestions about student teaching. TeacherEducationQuarterly,Spring,77-80.
  • Darling, L. F. (2001). Portfolio as practice: the narratives of emerging teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 107-121.
  • Dinkelman, T. (2000). An inquiry into the development of critical reflection in secondary student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 195-222.
  • Dubbins, R. (1996). The challenge of developing a ‘reflective practicum’. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24 (3), 269-280.
  • Eroz, N. S. (1997). Observing change in teaching behavior through reflection. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
  • Freeman, D. and Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417.
  • Freeman, D. A. and Richards, J. C. (eds.) (1996). Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gebhard, J. G. (1990). Interaction in a teaching practicum. In Richards, J. C. and Nunan, D. (Eds).Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 118-131).
  • George, J., Worrell, P. and Rampersad, J. (2002). Messages about good teaching: primary teacher trainees’ experiences of the practicum in Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 291-304.
  • Halbach, A. (2000). Trainee change through teacher training: a case study in training English language teachers in Spain. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26 (2), 139-146.
  • Hastings, W. and Squires, D. (2002). Restructuring and reculturing: practicum supervision as professional development for teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (1), 79-91.
  • Hertzog, H. S. (2002). “When, how, and who do I ask for help?”: Novices’ perceptions of problems and assistance. Teacher Education Quarterly, Summer, 25-41.
  • Hole, S. and McEntee, G. H. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership, 56(8), 34-37.
  • Johnson, K. E. (1992). Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (3), 507-535.
  • Koerner, M., Rust, F. and Baumgartner, F. (2002). Exploring roles in student teaching placements.Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 35-58.
  • Korukcu, S. (1996). An analysis of the problems of beginning teachers to develop an induction program for the Basic English Departments of Turkish universities. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
  • Kwo, O. (1996). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong classrooms: Patterns of reflections. In Freeman, D. and Richards, J. C. (Eds.) Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. (pp. 295-319).
  • LaMaster, K. J. (2001). Exchanging preservice teachers field experiences through the addition of a service-learning component. Journal of Experiential Education, 24 (1), 27-33.
  • Lee, S. K. F. and Loughran, J. (2000). Facilitating pre-service teachers’ reflection through a schoolbased teaching programme. Reflective Practice, 1 (1), 69-89.
  • Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29, 197-208.
  • Lockhart, C. and Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45 (4), 605-655.
  • MacDonald, C. J. (1992). The multiplicity of factors creating stress during the teaching practicum: the student teachers’ perspective. Education, 113 (1), 48-58.
  • Maloney, C. and Campbell-Evans, G. (2002). Using interactive journal writing as a strategy for professional growth. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (1), 39-50.
  • Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think?ELT Journal, 46 (3), 274-284.
  • Mau, R. (1997). Concerns of student teachers: Implications for improving the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25 (1), 53-65.
  • Murray-Harvey, R., Slee P. T., Lawson M. J., Silins H., Banfield, G. and Russell, A. (2000). Under Stress: the concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23 (1), 19-35.
  • Pennington, M. C. (1995). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (4), 705-731.
  • Reeves-Kazelskis, C. and King, D. A. (1994). Teaching concerns of preservice teachers. Paper presented at the twenty-third annual conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Nashville, Tennessee, November 9-11, 1994
  • Richards, J. C. and Crookes, G. (1988). The practicum in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (1), 9- 27.
  • Schick, J. E. and Nelson, P. B. (2001). Language teacher education: the challenge for the twenty-first century. Clearing House, 74 (6), 301-303.
  • Scrivener, J. (1994). Learning Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
  • Spezzini, S. and Oxford, R. (1998). Perspectives of preservice foreign language teachers. System, 26,65-76.
  • Stoynoff, S. (1999). The TESOL practicum: An integrated model in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (1),145-151.
  • Stuart, C. and Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (2), 113-121.
  • Tang, S. Y. F. (2002). From behind the pupil’s desk to the teacher’s desk: a qualitative study of student teachers’ professional learning in Hong Kong. Asia- Pacific Journal of teacher Education, 30 (1),51-65.
  • Tawney, J. W., and Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH:Charles E. Merrill Co.
  • Valdez, A., Young, B. and Hicks, S. J. (2000). Preservice teachers’ stories: content and context.Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter, 39-57.
  • Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
  • White, B. C. (2000). Pre-service teachers’ epistemology viewed through perspectives on problematic classroom situations. Journal of Teacher Education, 26 (3), 279-305.
  • Wu, C. and Lee, G. C. (1999). Use of BBS to facilitate a teaching practicum course. Computers and Education, 32, 239-247.
  • Zeichner, K. (1990). Changing directions in the practicum: Looking ahead to the 1990s. Journal of Education for Teaching, 16 (2), 105-132.
  • Zeyrek, D. (2001). Perspectives on professional growth: a study on the diaries of undergraduate ELT students. Forum, 39 (2), 8-15.
  • INTERNET RESOURCES
  • Dooley, K. E. and Murphrey, T. P. (2000). How the perspectives of administrators, faculty, and support units impact the rate of distance education adoption. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3 (4). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter34/dooley34.html (Retrieved on February 13, 2009)
  • Dye, J. F., Schatz, I. M., Rosenberg, R. A. and Coleman, S. T. (2000). Constant comparison method: A Kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report, 4 (1/2). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4- 1/dye.html (Retrieved on February 11, 2009)
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). Teachers talking about teaching: creating conditions for reflection. TESL-EJ, 4 (2), 1-14. http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej14/a1.html (Retrieved on February 1,2009)
  • Stevens, D. D., Sarıgül, S. and Değer, H. (2002). Turkish student teachers' early experiences in schools: critical incidents, reflection, and a new teacher education program. http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/~ctd/networks/journal/Vol%205(2).2002sept/ (Retrieved on February 3, 2009)
  • Zepeda, S. J. and Mayers, R. S. (2002). A case study of leadership in the middle grades: the work of the instructional lead teacher. Research in middle level education, 25 (1). http://www.nmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/publications/RMLE/rmle_vol25_no1_article1.pdf (Retrieved on February 15, 2009)