Örgüt İtibarı Kavramı ve Yönetimi ile İlgili Bazı Sorunlar

İtibar; gerek yönetim-örgüt kuramı gerekse diğer çalışma disiplinlerine ait yazınlarda gün geçtikçe daha fazla değinilen ve önemi vurgulanan bir kavram haline gelmektedir. Bu derece popüler hale gelen kavram ile ilgili yönetim-örgüt kuramı çalışma sahası içerisindeki baskın yazın, okuyucuların zihinlerinde itibarın örgütler tarafından her zaman istenildiği miktarda yönetilebileceğine dair bir izlenim yaratıyor, örgüt kuramı diliyle örgüt açısından “mutlak özgür iradeci” bir bakış açısı sergiliyor gibi görünmektedir. Bu çalışmada ise itibarın “mutlak” seviyede değil, belli ölçülerde yönetilebileceği kabul edilmekte ve örgütlerin itibarlarını kontrol altında tutmaya çalışırlarken bazı sorunlarla karşılaşabilecekleri, dolayısıyla örgütsel itibarın şekillendirilmesinin zannedildiğinin aksine oldukça karmaşık bir süreç olduğu ve itibarın yönetilebilme miktarının bir örgütten diğerine; örgütün politik ve ekonomik gücü, uluslararasılaşma düzeyi, icra kurulu başkanının yetenekleri vb. çeşitli faktörlere bağlı olarak değişebileceği fikri savunulmaktadır. Bu tür bir bilincin önce akademik çevrelerde, sonrasında uygulamacılar arasında oluşturulması önemlidir çünkü bu sayede örgütler itibar yönetimi kavramına daha ciddi yaklaşacaklardır. Ayrıca bu ana amaca ek olarak çalışmanın bir diğer amacı da örgüt itibarı kavramına netlik kazandırmaktır. Örgütsel itibarın oluşum sürecinin genel olarak iki ana safhayı içerdiği söylenebilir. Birinci safhada ya paydaş grupların bizzat kendileri örgüte dair bir deneyim yaşarlar ya da örgüt hakkındaki enformasyon ilgili paydaş gruplara deneyimi yaşamış diğer paydaş gruplarca veya medya kuruluşlarınca ulaştırılır. İkinci adımda ise bu enformasyon paydaş gruplarca yorumlanır ve zihinlerde örgüte dair itibari değer netleşir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle yazında henüz muğlak durumda bulunan örgütsel itibar kavramına netlik kazandırılmaya çalışılacak, ardından kavramın yönetimiyle ilgili güçlükler bu iki safha ekseninde tartışılacaktır.

The Concept of Corporate Reputtation and the Problems Related to It's Management

Reputation have become a concept importance of it is emphasized more and more by literatures of the management-organization theory field and other disciplines. The dominant corporate reputation literature seems to create a perception in readers’ mind that organizations can manage their reputations at absolute level or so close to it. But in this study, the idea, suggets the limited manageability of organizational reputation, is discussed. According to the study, while organizations try to control their reputations, they encounter some difficulties. Because of that reason, on the contrary of general belief in the literature, management of reputation is so complex process and degree of manageability of it depends on some organizational factors such as politic and financial power of an organization, degree of internationalization and skills of CEO and so on. The development of this type of consciousness is important because in this manner organizations can take concept of reputation more seriously. Also in addition to this main purpose, the another purpose of this study is the clarification of the corporate reputation concept.It generally can be said that formation of the corporate reputation comprises of two phases. In the first phase, stakeholders collect information about an organization via their personal experiences or they benefit from the others’ experiences. They also can provide this information from media. In the second phase, stakeholders intrepret this information and reputation of an organization appears in their minds. In this study, the first, organizational reputation concept will be explained and then difficulties pertaining to manageability of it will be discussed by focusing on these two phases of the process was expressed above briefly.

___

  • Abramovitz, A.I. (1975). Name familiarity, reputation and the incumbency effect in a congressional election. The Western Political Quarterly, 28(4), 668-684.
  • Alsop, RJ. (2004). Corporate reputation: Anything but superficial-the deep but fragile nature of corporate reputation. The Journal of Business Strategy, 25(6), 21-29.
  • Alvesson, M. (1998). The business concept as a symbol. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 28(3), 86-108.
  • Aperia, T., Bronn, P.S. ve Schultz, M. (2004). A reputation analysis of the most visible companies in the Scandinavian countries. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(3), 218-230.
  • Argenti, PA. ve Druckenmiller, B. (2004). Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 368-374.
  • Baden-Fuller, C. ve Ang, S.H. (2001). Building reputations: The role of alliances in the European business school scene. Long Range Planning, 34, 741-755.
  • Badenhausen, K. (1998). Quantifying brand values. Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (1/2), 48-51.
  • Balmer, J.M.T. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketine. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(8), 963-996.
  • Bar-Isaac, H. (2002). Reputation and survival: Learning in a dynamic signalling model. The Review of Economic Studies, April, 231 -251.
  • Barnett, M.A., Jermier, J.M. ve Lafferty, B.A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26-38.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  • Barney, J. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643-650.
  • Bennett, R. ve Gabriel, H. (2003). Image and reputational characteristics of UK charitable organizations: An empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 276-289.
  • Bennett, R. ve Kottasz, R. (2000). Practitioner perceptions of corporate reputation: An empirical investigation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 5(4), 224-234.
  • Bickerton, D. (2000). Corporate reputation versus corporate branding: The realist debate. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 5(1), 42-48.
  • Bramrner, S. ve Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate reputation and an insurance motivation for corporate social investment. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20, 39-51.
  • Bromley, D.B. (2001). Relationship between personal and corporate reputations. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 316-334.
  • Cable, D.M. ve Graham, M.E. (2000). Determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 929-947.
  • Caldeira, G.A. (1983). On the reputation of state supreme courts. Political Behavior, 5(1), 83-108.
  • Carmeli, A. ve Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1257-1278.
  • Carmeli, A. ve Tishler, A. (2005). Perceived organizational reputation and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of industrial enterprises. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 13-30.
  • Caruana, A. (1997). Corporate reputation: Concept and measurement. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(2), 109-118.
  • Chemmanur, TJ. ve Fulghieri, P. (1994). Investment bank reputation, information production, and financial intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 57-79.
  • Cfristensen, L.T. ve Askegaard, S. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited-A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 292-298.
  • Chu, S.Y. ve Fang, W.C. (2006). Exploring the relationship of trust and commitment in supply chain management. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(1), 224-228.
  • Coombs, W.T. ve Holladay, S J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial test of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165-186.
  • Crasswell, A.T., Francis, J.R. ve Taylor, S.I.. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20 (3), 297-322.
  • Cravens, K.S. ve Oliver, E.G. (2006). Employees: The key link corporate reputation management. Business Horizons, 49, 283-292.
  • Çiftçioğlu, B.A. (2008). Kurumsal itibarın çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığı üzerine etkileri ve bir uygulama. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.
  • De Castro, G.M., Saez, P.L. ve Lopez, J.K.N. (2004). The role of corporate reputation in developing relational capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 575-585.
  • Deephouse, D.L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091-1112.
  • Deephouse, D.L. (2002). The term 'reputation management': Users, uses and the trademark tradeoff. Corporate Reputation Review, 5( I), 9-18.
  • Dentchev, N.A. ve Heene, A. (2004). Managing the reputation of restructuring corporations: Send the right signal to the right stakeholder. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(1), 56-72.
  • Dhir, K.S. ve Vinen, D. (2005). Managing corporate respectability: Concept, issues, and policy formulation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(1), 5-23.
  • Dierickx, I. ve Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainabilitv of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511.
  • Dollinger, M J., Golden, P.A. ve Saxton, T. (1997). The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture. Strategic Management Journal, 18(2), 127-140.
  • Dolphin, R.R. (2003). The corporate communication function: How well is it funded?. Corporate Communications, 8(1), 5-10.
  • Dolphin, R.R. (2004). Corporate reputation-A value creating strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 77-92.
  • Dortok, A. (2006). A managerial look at the interaction between internal communication and corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(4), 322-337.
  • Dowling, G.R. (2004). Corporate reputations: Should you compete on yours?. California Management Review, 46(3), 19-36.
  • Efil, I. ve Eryilmaz, M. (2006). Otel işletmeleri hakkında müşterilerin kurumsal itibar algılarını belirleyen faktörler ve bu faktörlerin kendi aralarında hiyerarşik durumlarını ortaya koymaya yönelik bir araştırma. 14. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Erzurum.
  • Ettore, B. (1996). The care and feeling of a corporate reputation. Management Review, June, 39-42.
  • Fan, Y. (2005). Ethical branding and corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 341-350.
  • Fillis, I. (2003). Image, reputation and identity issues in the arts and crafts organization. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 239-251.
  • Firestein, PJ. (2006). Building and protecting corporate reputation. Strategy and Leadership, 34(4), 25-31.
  • Fombrun, CJ., Gardberg, N. ve Sever, J. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate communication. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4).
  • Fombrun, C J. ve Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), 233-258.
  • Freemann, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
  • Fryxell, G.E. ve Wang, J. (1994). The fortune corporate 'reputation' index: Reputation for what?". Journal of Management, 20(1), 1-14.
  • Gardberg, N.A. (2006). Reputatie, reputation, reputation, reputazione, ruf: A cross-cultural qualitative analysis of construct and instrument equivalence. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 39-61.
  • Gardberg, N.A. ve Fombrun, C J. (2002). The global reputation quotient project: First steps towards a cross-nationally valid measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(4), 303-307.
  • Goldberg, A.I., Cohen, G. ve Feigenbaum, A. (2003). Reputational building: Small business strategies for successful venture development. Journal of Small Business Management, 41 (2), 168-187.
  • Goldberg, M.E. ve Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 172-179.
  • Gotsi, M. ve Wilson, A.M. (2001). Corporate definition: Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications, 6(1), 24-30.
  • Gray, E.R. ve Balmer, J.M.T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695-702.
  • Greyser, S.A. (1999). Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications, 4(4), 177-184.
  • Greenland, E.A.G. (2002). Qualitative research to validate the RQ dimensions. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(4), 308-315.
  • Grunig, S.D. (1997). Research, reputation and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisation. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(19, 17-52.
  • Grupp, R.W. ve Gaines-Ross, L. (2002). Reputation management in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 9(1), 17-26.
  • Guisinger, A. ve Smith, A. (2002). Honest threats: The interaction of reputation and political institutions in international crises. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(2), 175-200.
  • Hamori, M. (2003). The impact of reputation capital on the career paths of departing employees. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3), 304-315.
  • Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.
  • Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607-618.
  • Herbig, P. ve Milewicz, J. (1993). The relationship reputation and credibility to brand success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(1), 5-10.
  • Herbig, P. ve Milewicz, J. (1995). To be or not to be...credible that is: A model of credibility among competing firms. Marketing intelligence and Planning, 13 (6), 24-33.
  • Herbig, P., Milewicz, J. ve Golden, J. (1994). A model of reputation creation and destruction. Journal of Business Research.
  • Heumg, V.C.S. ve Lam, T. (2003). Customer complaint behaviour towards hotel restaurant services. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 15/5, 283-289.
  • Horner, J. (2002). Reputation and competition. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 644-663.
  • Kadıbeşegil, S. (2006). İtibar yönetimi: İtibarınızı yönetmekten daha önemli bir işiniz var mı?. 2.Baskı, İstanbul: Media Cat.
  • Kaplan, R.S. ve Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71-79.
  • Kaplan, R.S. ve Norton, D.P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 134-147.
  • Kaplan, R.S. ve Norton,D.P.(1996).Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. jsiness Review, January-February. 75-85.
  • Karaköse, T. (2006). Örgütlerde itibar yönetimi, http://www.akademikbakis.org/sayill/ makale/itibar.doc. Erişim Tarihi: 23.01.2008.
  • Kitchen, PJ. ve Laurence, A. (2003). Corporate reputation: An eight-country analysis. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 103-117.
  • Kreps, D.M. ve Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253-279.
  • Levellyn, P.G. (2002). Corporate reputation: Focusing the Zeitgeist. Business and Society, 41(4), 446-455.
  • Mahon, J.F. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business and Society, 41(4), 415-445.
  • Mahon, J.F. ve Wartick, S.L. (2003). Dealing with stakeholders: How reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 19-35.
  • Milewicz, J. ve Herbig, P. (1994). Evaluating the brand extension decision using a model of reputation building. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 3(1), 39-47.
  • Nakra, P. (2000). Corporate reputation management: 'CRM' with a strategic twist. Public Relations Quarterly, Summer, 35-42.
  • Nguyen, N. ve LeBlanc, G. (2001a). Corporate image and corporate reputation customers retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Customer Services, 8, 227-236.
  • Nguyen, N. ve LeBlanc, G. (2001b). Image and reputation of higher education institutions in students' retention decisions. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15,6/7, 303-311.
  • Padanyi, P. ve Gainer, B. (2003). Peer reputation in the non-profit sector: Its role in non-profit sector management. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 252-265.
  • Perrow, C. (1961). Organizational prestige: Some functions and dsyfunctions. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(4), 335-341.
  • Pharoah, A. (2003). Corporate reputation: The boardroom challenge. Corporate Governance, 3(4), 46-51.
  • Porritt, D. (2005). The reputational failure of financial success: The 'bottom line back lash" effect. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 198-213.
  • Pruzan, P. (2001). Corporate reputation: Image and identity. Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (1), 50-61.
  • Qu, W. (2007). Moderating effects of age, gender, income, and education on consumer's response to corporate reputation. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(2), 190-194.
  • Raub, W. ve Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626-654.
  • Ree, M. ve Haunschild, P.R. (2006). The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101-117.
  • Resnick, J.T. (2004). Corporate reputation-managing corporate reputation-applying rigoruous measures to a key asset. The Journal of Business Strategy, 25(6), 30-37.
  • Roberts, P.W. ve Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077-1093.
  • Rose, C. and Thomsen, S. (2004). The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence. European Management Journal, 22(2), 201-210.
  • Sabate, J.M.F. ve Puente, E.Q. (2003). Empirical analysis of relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: A survey of the literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 161-177.
  • Schreiber, E.S. (2002). Why do many otherwise smart CEOs mismanage the reputation asset of their company. Journal of Communication Management, 6(3), 209-219.
  • Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (4), 661-679.
  • Shenkar, O. ve Yutchman-Yaar, E. (1997). Reputation, image, prestige and goodwill: An interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing. Human Relations, 50(11), 1361-1381.
  • Shortt, G. ve Ruys, H. (1994). Hotel security: The needs of the mature age market. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 6(5), 14-19.
  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. ve Van Riel, C.B.M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.
  • Sönmez, M. (1992). Türkiyede holdingler: Kırk haramiler. Arkadaş Yayınlan, Ankara.
  • Speckbacher, G., Bischof, J. ve Pfeiffer, T. (2003). A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Management Accounting Research, 14, 361-387.
  • Srivastava, R.K., McLish, T.H., Wood, R.A. ve Capraro, AJ. (1997). The value of corporate reputation: Evidence from the equity markets. Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 62-68.
  • Staw, B. M. ve Epstein, L.D. (2000). What bandwagons bring?: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation and ceo pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523-556.
  • Şatır, Ç. (2006). The nature of corporate reputation and measurement of reputation components. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 11(1), 56-63.
  • Tadekis, S.(1999).What's in a name? Reputation as a tradeable asset.The American Economic Review, 89(3),548-463.
  • Tuncker, L. ve Melewar, T.C. (2005). Corporate reputation and crisis management: The threat and manageability of anti-corporatism. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 377-387.
  • Turban, D.B. ve Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
  • Van Der Jagt, R. (2005). Senior business executives see business communication and reputation as a crucial part of their leadership role. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 179-186.
  • Wang, J. (2005). Consumer nationalism and corporate reputation management in the global era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(3), 223-239.
  • Wartick, S.L. (1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business and Society, 31(1), 33-49.
  • Wei, Y.K. (2002). Corporate images as collect ethos: A post structuralist approach. Corporate Communications, 7(4), 269-278.
  • Weigelt, K. ve Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443-454.
  • Whetten, DA. ve Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business and Society, 41(4), 393-414.
  • Yoon, E., Guffey, H J. ve Kijevski, V. (1993). The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service. Journal of Business Research, 27 (3), 215-228.
  • Zyglidopoulos, S.C. (2003). The issue life-cycle: Implications for reputation for social performance and organizational legitimacy. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 70-81.