Nejdet ÖZBERK

10137

Özel Mülkiyet-Doğa Koruma İkilemine Sahadan Bir Bakış: Alakır Nehri Kardeşliği Örneği

Doğayı korumak için ona ya da onun bir parçasının haklarına malik olmak mı gerekir? Özel mülkiyet ile doğa koruma arasındaki çelişkili ilişkiyi konu alan bu çalışma Türkiye’den bir çevre mücadelesinde koruma vaadiyle satın alarak, mülkiyet edinimi yoluyla çevre koruma taktiğinin devreye sokulduğu bir örnek olay incelenmesidir. Türkiye’de çevre politikasında doğa koruma amaçlı mülkiyet satın alımı görülmemiş bir şeydir. Ancak 2019 yılı Mayıs ayında Antalya Kumluca’da bir grup yerel çevre aktivisti, Alakır Nehri Kardeşliği (ANK), online bir bağış kampanyası yürüterek ‘yaşam alanlarının’ hemen bitişiğindeki iki parsel imarsız kamu arazisini devletten ihale yoluyla satın aldılar. Bu çalışma Türkiye’de çevresel satın almaların ilk örneğini, çevre ve adalet politikası aracı olarak türünün emsalini incelemesi açısından özgün ve önemlidir. Bu vaka çalışması birincil ve ikincil verilere dayanmaktadır. Bu veriler doğanın ve doğa korumanın neoliberalleştirilmesine ilişkin teorik politik ekoloji çerçevesi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.

A Look at the Private Property-Nature Conservation Dilemma from the Field: The Case of the Friends of Alakır River

To truly protect the nature is it needed to own it or a portion of the rights to it? This research on the paradoxical relationships intrinsic to the private property and nature conservation, is a case study that looks at a new tactic for nature conservation in Turkey. Unusual is it the case that a property buyout with the promise of conservation in Turkish environmental policy. However, in May 2019, in Antalya Kumluca, the Friends of Alakır River (FAR), a group of grassroots environmental activists, organizing an online donation campaign for an environmental buyout, bought two parcels of unzoned public land from the state by tender, that are located in close proximity to their village house or ‘lifeworld’. And this case study is original and important for both being the first study on an unprecedented environmental policy and justice tool in Turkey. The study combines both primary and secondary data. and these data were analysed using theoretical political ecology framework on neoliberalisation of nature and nature conservation

___

  • Aksu, C. ve R. Korkut (2017). Ekoloji Almanağı 2005-2016. İstanbul: Yeni İnsan.
  • Aksu, C., S. Erensü ve E. Evren (2016). Sudan Sebepler: Türkiye’de Neoliberal SuEnerji Politikaları ve Direnişler. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • “Alakır’da Taş Ocağı Şirketine Karşı Girilen Arazi İhalesi Kazanıldı” (2019). https:// www.evrensel.net/haber/380059/alakirda-tas-ocagi-sirketine-karsi-girilen-araziihalesi-kazanildi (19. 06. 2019).
  • Anderson, T. L.ve D. R. Leal (1997). Enviro-Capitalists: Doing Good While Doing Well. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Baloğlu, B. (2014). “Kuş Seslerinden Kepçe Seslerine: Alakır’da Hidroelektrik Santraller”. https://www.bilim.org/kus-seslerinden-kepce-seslerine-alakirdahidroelektrik-santraller/ (19.06.2019).
  • Barbosa, L. C. (2015). Guardians of the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest: Environmental Organizations and Development. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Beder, S. (2006a). Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Approach. University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.
  • Beder, S. (2006b). “The Changing Face of Conservation: Commodification, Privatisation and the Free Market”. Gaining Ground: In Pursuit of Ecological Sustainability, International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ed. D. M. Lavingne). Limerick: University of Limerick.
  • Birchard, B. (2005). Nature’s Keepers : The Remarkable Story of How The Nature Conservancy Became the Largest Environmental Organization in the World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Blomley, N. (2004). “Unreal Estate: Proprietary Space and Public Gardening”. Antipode, 36(4), 614-641.
  • Bosworth, K. (2018). “They’re Treating Us Like Indians!”: Political Ecologies of Property and Race in North American Pipeline Populism”. Antipode, doi: 10.1111/anti.12426, 1-21.
  • Brewer, R. (2003). Conservancy: The Land Trust Movement in America. Lebanon: University Press of New England.
  • Brockington, D., R. Duffy ve J. Igoe (2008). Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas. London: Earthscan.
  • Brockington, D. ve R. Duffy (2011). Capitalism and Conservation. West Sussex: Blackwell.
  • Bullard, R. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Bullard, R. (1994) Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
  • Büscher, B., W. Dressler ve R. Fletcher (2014). Nature™ Inc. Environmental Conservation in the Neoliberal Age. Arizona: University of Arizona Press.
  • Cannavo, P. F. (2007). The Working Landscape Founding, Preservation, and the Politics of Place. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Castree, N. (2011). “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 3: Putting Theory into Practice,”. Geography Compass, 5(1), 35-49.
  • Castree, N. (2010a) “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 1: What ‘Neoliberalism’ is, and What Difference Nature Makes to it”. Geography Compass, 4(12), 1725-1733.
  • Castree, N. (2010b) “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 2: Theorising the Neoliberalisation of Nature”. Geography Compass, 4(12), 1734-1746.
  • Castree, N. (2008a). “Neoliberalising Nature: The Logic of Deregulation and Reregulation”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 131- 152.
  • Castree, N. (2008b). “Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects and Evaluations”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 153-173.
  • Clark, S. (2007). A Field Guide to Conservation Finance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • “Çevrecilere 20 milyonluk ihtarname”(2014). http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/cevrecilere20-milyonluk-ihtarname-26540952 (19. 06. 2019).
  • DeFilippis, J., O. R. Williams, J. Pierce, D. G. Martin, R. Kruger ve A. H. Esfahani (2019) .“On the Transformative Potential of Community Land Trusts in the United States”. Antipode, 51(3), 795-817.
  • Dempsey, J. ve D. C. Suarez (2016). “Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 653-671.
  • Earl, J. ve K. Kimport (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fairfax, S., K, L. Gwin, M. Ann King, L. Raymond ve L A. Watt (2005). Buying Nature: The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780-2004.
  • Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fairfax, S. K., ve D. Guenzler (2001). Conservation Trusts. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Fields, S. (2004). “Environmental Buyouts: Protection at a Price”. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(6), 360-363.
  • Gedicks, A. (2000). Resource Rebels: Native Challenges to Mining and Oil Corporations. South End Press.
  • Gerber, J-D. ve A. R Rissman (2012). “Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(8), 1836-1855.
  • Gilio-Whitaker, D. (2019). As Long as Grass Grows: the Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice, from Colonization to Standing Rock. Boston: Beacon Press
  • Castree, N. (2010b) “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 2: Theorising the Neoliberalisation of Nature”. Geography Compass, 4(12), 1734-1746.
  • Castree, N. (2008a). “Neoliberalising Nature: The Logic of Deregulation and Reregulation”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 131- 152.
  • Castree, N. (2008b). “Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects and Evaluations”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 153-173.
  • Clark, S. (2007). A Field Guide to Conservation Finance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • “Çevrecilere 20 milyonluk ihtarname”(2014). http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/cevrecilere20-milyonluk-ihtarname-26540952 (19. 06. 2019). DeFilippis, J., O. R. Williams, J. Pierce, D. G. Martin, R. Kruger ve A. H. Esfahani (2019) .“On the Transformative Potential of Community Land Trusts in the United States”. Antipode, 51(3), 795-817.
  • Dempsey, J. ve D. C. Suarez (2016). “Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 653-671.
  • Earl, J. ve K. Kimport (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fairfax, S., K, L. Gwin, M. Ann King, L. Raymond ve L A. Watt (2005). Buying Nature: The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780-2004. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fairfax, S. K., ve D. Guenzler (2001). Conservation Trusts. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Fields, S. (2004). “Environmental Buyouts: Protection at a Price”. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(6), 360-363.
  • Gedicks, A. (2000). Resource Rebels: Native Challenges to Mining and Oil Corporations. South End Press.
  • Gerber, J-D. ve A. R Rissman (2012). “Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(8), 1836-1855.
  • Gilio-Whitaker, D. (2019). As Long as Grass Grows: the Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice, from Colonization to Standing Rock. Boston: Beacon Press
  • Ginn, W. J. (2005). Investing in Nature: Case Studies of Land Conservation in Collaboration with Business. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Grossman, Z. (2017). Unlikely Alliances: Native Nations and White Communities Join to Defend Rural Lands. University of Washington Press: Seattle.
  • Grossman, Z. ve D. McNutt, (2001). “From Enemies to Allies”. Colorlines, 22-25. Hamsici, M. (2012). Dereler ve İsyanlar. Ankara: Notabene.
  • Hanson, L. L. (2014) “Re-engineering the Contours of Conservation: Alberta Land Trusts and the Neoliberalization of Nature”. Found in Alberta: Environmental Themes for the Anthropocene. (Ed. R. Boschman ve M. T. Waterloo). ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. Hardin, G. (1968) “The Tragedy of the Commons”. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. “HES şirketine karşı dayanışmayla kazanılan ihale süreci” (2019) https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=hr1pryjgsk0 (14.05. 2019). Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham ve P. Robbins (2007). Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences. London: Routledge. Heynen, N. ve P. Robbins (2005). “The Neoliberalization of Nature: Governance, Privatization Enclosure and Valuation”. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 5-8. Holloway, J. (2005). Change the World Without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press. Hine, C. (2008). “Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances”. The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. (Ed. Nigel G. Fielding, Raymond M. Lee ve Grant Blank ). London: Sage. [İhale İlanı](2019a). https://www.milliemlak.gov.tr/Sayfalar/ilanlar/satis-etay.aspx? ENO=07130104546&ENO=07130104546 (07.05. 2019). [İhale İlanı](2019b). https://www.milliemlak.gov.tr/Sayfalar/ilanlar/satis-etay. aspx?ENO=0713010 4912&ENO=07130104912 (07.05. 2019). Kantarcı, M. D. (2011). Alakır Çayı Havzasında Nehir Tipi Hidroelektrik Santralleri (HES) Kurulması Girişimlerinin Ekolojik Bakımdan İrdelenmesi. http://www. cem.gov.tr/erozyon/Files/resimliHaber/2012_corum_egitimi/Alakir_Cayi_ Havzasi_2011_Kitap.pdf (07.06. 2019). Kay, K. (2018). “A Hostile Takeover of Nature? Placing Value in Conservation Finance”. Antipode, 50(1), 164-183. Kay, K. (2015) “Breaking the Bundle of Rights: Conservation Easements and the Legal Geographies of Individuating Nature”. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48 3), 504-522.
  • Larsen, P. B. ve D. Brockington (2018). The Anthropology of Conservation NGOs : Rethinking the Boundaries. Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave.
  • Lauermann, J. ve A. Vogelpohl (2019). Fast Activism: Resisting MobilePolicies”. Antipode, 51(4), 1231-1250 Loftus, A. ve H. March (2015). “Financialising Nature?”. Geoforum, 60, 172-175. McAfee, Kathleen (1999) “Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17(2), 13- 154. McCarthy, J. ve S. Prudham (2004). “Neoliberal Nature and the Nature of Neoliberalism”. Geoforum, 35(3), 275-283. MacDonald, K. I. (2010). “The Devil is in the (Bio)diversity: Private Sector “Engagement” and the Restructuring of Biodiversity Conservation”. Antipode, 42(3), 513-550. Mansfıeld, B. (2008). Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature–Society Relations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Mosca, L. (2014). “Methodological Practices in Social Movement Online Research”. Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. (Ed. Donatella della Porta). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mosca, L. (2010). “From the Streets to the Net? The Political Use of the Internet by Social Movements”. International Journal of E-Politics, 1(1), 1-21. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Postill, J. ve S. Pink (2012). “Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web”. Media International Australia, No. 145, 123-134. Rissman, A. R. (2013). “Rethinking Property Rights: Comparative Analysis of Conservation Easements for Wildlife Conservation”. Environmental Conservation, 40(3), 222–230. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice. Clarendon: Oxford University Press. Şengül, M., G. A. Kocatürk ve F. Bilgili (2017). “Sanal Mekânda Yerel Çevre Hareketleri: Türkiye’de HES Karşıtı Mücadeleler Üzerine Bir İnceleme”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C.22, Kayfor15 Özel Sayısı, 2183- 2207. Şengül, M. (2018). Türkiye›de “Sermaye Kapanı”ndaki Köylülerin HES Karşıtı Mücadelesi: Köylülerin Korumaya Çalıştığı Doğa mı?”. İdealkent, 8(21), 57-90.
  • Smith, N. (2007). “Nature as Accumulation Strategy”. Socialist Register” 43, 16-36. Sullivan, S. (2013). “Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation”. Antipode, 45(1), 198-217.
  • Turhan, E. ve H. (Özmen) Çağatay (2015). “Hidroelektrik Santrallerin (HES) Çevresel ve Sosyal Etkileri: Alakır Vadisi Örneği” 4. Su Yapıları Sempozyumu. Antalya: TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası. “Vakıflar Katliamı”(2016) http://www.alakirinsesi.org/vakiflar-katliami-alakir-vadisi29-subat-2016/ (19.06.2019) Watts, J. (2018). Interview The defenders Hydropower “We have become Guardians’: Turkey’s Accidental Forest Protectors. https://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2018/jul/21/we-have-become-guardians-turkeys-accidental-forestprotectors (24.05.2019) Yılmaz, Ç. (2019). “Yaşam İhalesini Kazandılar”. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yasamihalesini-kazandilar-gundem-2870726/ (19.06.2019). Yüce, M. (2019) “HES Şirketine Karşı Yaşam Kazandı”. Antalya Körfez Gazetesi. https://antalyakorfez.com/haber/28325-hes-sirketine-karsi-yasam-kazandi (19.06.2019).Smith, N. (2007). “Nature as Accumulation Strategy”. Socialist Register” 43, 16-36. Sullivan, S. (2013). “Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation”. Antipode, 45(1), 198-217. Turhan, E. ve H. (Özmen) Çağatay (2015). “Hidroelektrik Santrallerin (HES) Çevresel ve Sosyal Etkileri: Alakır Vadisi Örneği” 4. Su Yapıları Sempozyumu. Antalya: TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası. “Vakıflar Katliamı”(2016) http://www.alakirinsesi.org/vakiflar-katliami-alakir-vadisi29-subat-2016/ (19.06.2019) Watts, J. (2018). Interview The defenders Hydropower “We have become Guardians’: Turkey’s Accidental Forest Protectors. https://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2018/jul/21/we-have-become-guardians-turkeys-accidental-forestprotectors (24.05.2019) Yılmaz, Ç. (2019). “Yaşam İhalesini Kazandılar”. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yasamihalesini-kazandilar-gundem-2870726/ (19.06.2019). Yüce, M. (2019) “HES Şirketine Karşı Yaşam Kazandı”. Antalya Körfez Gazetesi. https://antalyakorfez.com/haber/28325-hes-sirketine-karsi-yasam-kazandi (19.06.2019).
Amme İdaresi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1795
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1968
  • Yayıncı: -
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Avrupa Birliği’ne Üyelik Sürecinde Türkiye’de Arazi Bankacılığı

Ayşegül MENGİ, Gökçe KARALEZLİ

Özel Mülkiyet-Doğa Koruma İkilemine Sahadan Bir Bakış: Alakır Nehri Kardeşliği Örneği

Nejdet ÖZBERK

Murray Bookchin’in Toplumsal Ekoloji Kavrayışı Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme

Murat İNCE

Hümanist mi Bağnaz mı? Thomas More ve Ütopya’sını Yeniden Okumak

Yunus KOÇ, Gökhan TOPLUK

Modern Devletin Yönetim Fonksiyonu Olarak Halkla İlişkiler ve 1980 Sonrası Şekillenişi

Eren EROĞLU, Aslı YAĞMURLU

Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Oryantalizm ve Ulus İmajı: Lilo Linke Örneği (1937)

Hümeyra TÜREDİ