___

• Atıf yapılmış eserler
• Austin, J.L., 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Austin, John, 1832, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, H.L.A. Hart ed. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954.
• Bentham, Jeremy, 1776, A Fragment on Government, J.H.Burns and H.L.A. Hart ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
• Bentham, Jeremy, 1782, Of Laws in General, H.L.A. Hart ed., London: Athlone Press, 1970.
• Bentham, Jeremy, 1843, Anarchical Fallacies.
• Coleman, Jules (ed.), 2001, Hart's Postscript, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Coleman, Jules and Simchen, Ori, 2003, “Law” Legal Theory, 9: 1–41.
• Dascal, Marcelo and Wroblewski, Jerzy, 1988, “Transparency and Doubt: Understanding and Interpretation in Pragmatics and in Law” Law and Philosophy, 7: 203–224.
• De Paramo, 1988, “Entrevista a HLA Hart”, Doxa, 5: 340.
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1986a, “Is There Really No Right Answer in Hard Cases?” in A Matter of Principle, Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1986b, Law's Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press)
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1991, “On Gaps in the Law” in Neil MacCormick and Paul Amselek (eds.), Controversies about Law's Ontology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Endicott, Timothy, 2001, “Law is Necessarily Vague” Legal Theory, 7: 377–383.
• Finnis, John, 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Greenawalt, Kent, 2001, “Vagueness and Judicial Responses to Legal Indeterminacy” Legal Theory, 7: 433–445.
• H.L.A. Hart, 1994, The Concept of Law, 2nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• H.L.A. Hart, 1982, Essays on Bentham, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Marmor, Andrei, 2008, “The Pragmatics of Legal Language” Ratio Juris, 21: 423–452.
• Posner, Richard, 1996, Law and Legal Theory in England and America, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Raz, Joseph, 1990, Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Schiffer, Stephen, 2001, “A Little Help from your Friends?” Legal Theory, 7: 421–431.
• Stavropoulos, Nicos, 1996, Objectivity in Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press. İlave Okuma Alchourrón, Carlos, and Bulygin, Eugenio, 1971, Normative Systems, Vienna: Springer.
• Bix, Brian, 1996, Law, Language and Legal Determinacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Blackburn, Simon, 1984, Spreading the Word, Oxford: Oxford University Press; especially pages 205–209.
• Brink, David O., 1988, “Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 17: 105–48.
• Bulygin, Eugenio, 1982, “Norms, normative propositions and legal statements”, in G. Floistad (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy A New Survey, The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 157–163.
• Greenawalt, Kent, 1992, Law and Objectivity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Greenberg, Mark and Harry Litman, 1998, “The Meaning of Original Meaning” Georgetown Law Journal, 86: 569.
• Endicott, Timothy, 2000 Vagueness in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Greenawalt, Kent, 2002, “How to Speak the Truth” American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46: 229–248.
• Greenawalt, Kent, 2005, “The Value of Vagueness” in Vijay K. Bhatia, Jan Engberg, Maurizio Gotti and Dorothee Heller (eds), Vagueness in Normative Texts, Bern: Peter Lang, Chapter 1, 27–48.
• Fish, Stanley, 1989, Doing What Comes Naturally, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Green, Michael, 2003, “Dworkin's Fallacy, or What the Philosophy of Language Can't Teach Us about the Law”, Virginia Law Review, 89: 1897–1952.
• Moore, Michael, 1985, “A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation” Southern California Law Review, 58: 277
• Patterson, Dennis, 1996, Law and Truth, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Perelman, Chaim, 1963, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Williams, Glanville, 1945–1946, “Language and the Law”, Law Quarterly Review, 61: 71, 179, 293, 384; 62: 387.